Human Genetics

, Volume 133, Issue 1, pp 59–67 | Cite as

Comprehensive analysis of the transcriptional landscape of the human FMR1 gene reveals two new long noncoding RNAs differentially expressed in Fragile X syndrome and Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome

  • Chiara Pastori
  • Veronica J. Peschansky
  • Deborah Barbouth
  • Arpit Mehta
  • Jose P. Silva
  • Claes Wahlestedt
Open Access
Original Investigation


The majority of the human genome is transcribed but not translated, giving rise to noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long ncRNAs (lncRNAs, >200 nt) that perform a wide range of functions in gene regulation. The Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene is a microsatellite locus that in the general population contains <55 CGG repeats in its 5′-untranslated region. Expansion of this repeat region to a size of 55-200 CGG repeats, known as premutation, is associated with Fragile X tremor and ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Further expansion beyond 200 CGG repeats, or full mutation, leads to FMR1 gene silencing and results in Fragile X syndrome (FXS). Using a novel technology called “Deep-RACE”, which combines rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) with next generation sequencing, we systematically interrogated the FMR1 gene locus for the occurrence of novel lncRNAs. We discovered two transcripts, FMR5 and FMR6. FMR5 is a sense lncRNA transcribed upstream of the FMR1 promoter, whereas FMR6 is an antisense transcript overlapping the 3′ region of FMR1. FMR5 was expressed in several human brain regions from unaffected individuals and from full and premutation patients. FMR6 was silenced in full mutation and, unexpectedly, in premutation carriers suggesting abnormal transcription and/or chromatin remodeling prior to transition to the full mutation. These lncRNAs may thus be useful as biomarkers, allowing for early detection and therapeutic intervention in FXS and FXTAS. Finally we show that FMR5 and FMR6 are expressed in peripheral blood leukocytes and propose future studies that correlate lncRNA expression with clinical outcomes.


Trinucleotide repeat expansions give rise to more than 30 neurological and neuromuscular diseases, including Huntington’s disease (HD), Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) and Spinocerebellar Ataxia (Lopez Castel et al. 2010; Mirkin 2007). FXS, an X-linked genetic disorder, is the leading cause of inherited intellectual disability, and is otherwise characterized by behavioral problems and specific physical dysmorphisms. It is caused by an expansion of CGG repeats in the 5′ untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the Fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1). The 5′-UTR of FMR1 contains 6–54 repeats in the general population; however, this region occasionally expands in subsequent generations. A size of 55–200 repeats is called a “premutation” (PM), while an expansion beyond 200 repeats is called a full mutation and results in Fragile X Syndrome in males. In most patients with FXS, both an upstream CpG island and the expanded CGG/CCG repeats are hypermethylated (Hornstra et al. 1993; Sutcliffe et al. 1992). This hypermethylation is associated with hypoacetylation of histones H3 and H4 in the promoter and the 5′ UTR of FMR1 (Coffee et al. 2002; Coffee et al. 1999), leading to chromatin condensation and transcriptional silencing. The protein encoded by FMR1, FMRP, is an RNA-binding protein involved in translational repression, synaptic maturation, dendritic mRNA localization and nucleoplasmic shuttling of mRNA (Antar et al. 2005; Brown et al. 1998; Weiler et al. 1997) lending support to the idea that its aberrant expression contributes to the intellectual disabilities (ID) associated with FXS (Hinton et al. 1991; Irwin et al. 2000; O’Donnell and Warren, 2002). FMRP may also have other important functions in the nucleus, according to a recent study showing that FMRP binds methylated H3K79 chromatin and mediates the DNA-damage response pathway (Shi et al. 2012). FMR1 premutation carriers are at risk for developing FXTAS, a neurodegenerative condition affecting approximately 46 % of males and 17 % of females (Garcia-Arocena and Hagerman 2010). FXTAS is characterized by ataxia, parkinsonism, intentional tremors, psychiatric symptoms and cognitive decline with onset usually after 50 years of age (Hagerman et al. 2001). Additionally, approximately 20 % of female premutation carriers are at an increased risk for FXPOI (Allingham-Hawkins et al. 1999). Although each Fragile X-associated condition does have a characteristic phenotype, great variability exists in severity and penetrance.

Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms by which FXS and FXTAS/FXPOI arise are largely unrelated. In FXS, the symptoms are due to the silencing of FMR1 and ensuing lack of FMRP, while in FXTAS/FXPOI the expansion does not silence the FMR1 gene. In fact, FMRP levels in FXTAS are not or only slightly reduced compared to the normal population whereas FMR1 mRNA expression levels are increased two to eightfold, suggesting an RNA toxicity mechanism underlying this condition. Although the precise mechanism for this overexpression is still unknown, it has been postulated that a longer tract of CGG repeats near the FMR1 promoter results in a more open chromatin state, thereby promoting access by transcription factors (Kenneson et al. 2001; Tassone et al. 2000).

Vast genomic regions are transcribed but not translated and many of the resulting transcripts, known as noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), are enriched in the brain (Banfai et al. 2012; Cheng et al. 2005; Djebali et al. 2012). Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), which are ncRNAs longer than 200 nucleotides, perform a wide range of functions, including modulation of transcription or of the epigenetic landscape of their loci of origin. LncRNAs can be transcribed from the sense and antisense strands of protein-coding genes, and can arise from introns, promoters and 3′ end regions (Djebali et al. 2012; Mattick, 2005; Yan and Ma, 2012). Transcriptomic studies have revealed that antisense transcription is a common feature of mammalian genes that are actively transcribed from microsatellite disease loci (Cho et al. 2005; Ladd et al. 2007; Moseley et al. 2006). Furthermore, others and we have recently reported that lncRNAs emanate from the FMR1 gene locus and are differentially expressed in both FXS and premutation carriers (Khalil et al. 2008; Ladd et al. 2007). These FMR1-derived lncRNAs are primate-specific, and animal models have not addressed their potential influence on the FXS phenotype (The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium 1994; Chen and Toth 2001; Fisch et al. 1999; Godfraind et al. 1996; Miller et al. 1999; Stafstrom et al. 2012). It is possible that ncRNAs produced from the FMR1 locus may modulate certain aspects of FXS/FXTAS as has been demonstrated in other human diseases [reviewed in (Pastori and Wahlestedt 2012)]. We hypothesize that ncRNA may contribute to and be reflective of clinical variability in humans and hence could be used as biomarkers for FXS/FXTAS.

Here, we employed a recently developed method called Deep-RACE (Olivarius et al. 2009) to comprehensively search the entire FMR1 locus for novel lncRNAs. The NCBI database reports several antisense-oriented ESTs (Expressed Sequence Tags) mapping to the FMR1 locus, suggesting the presence of as yet uncharacterized transcripts. By performing rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) on total human brain RNA followed by next generation sequencing, we have identified two new transcripts that we refer to as FMR5 and FMR6. The expression of these newly described RNA species was validated in several regions of unaffected human brain tissue as well as in brain samples from FXS and premutation carriers. Our work provides a systematic analysis of the complex transcriptional landscape of the FMR1 locus, uncovering two novel lncRNAs.

Materials and methods


Here we modified an existing protocol developed in 2009 to identify in a high-throughput manner the transcription start site of genes of interest using 5′RACE (Olivarius et al. 2009). We applied the same strategy using 3′RACE to detect the end of transcripts of interest.

Sense oriented 5′ RACE

5′ RACE for sense-oriented novel transcripts was performed using the Invitrogen 5′ RACE System according to manufacturer instructions (Invitrogen cat#18374-058). Briefly, strand-specific cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total human brain RNA (Clontech, cat#636530) using gene-specific primers (GSP1, Online Resource 3) located 500 bp upstream the TSS of FMR1. After first strand cDNA synthesis, a homopolymeric tail was added to the 3′-end of the cDNA, using TdT enzyme and dCTP. Tailed cDNA was then amplified using gene-specific primer 2 (GSP2, Online Resource 3) and the Abridged Anchor Primer (AAP) provided with the system. PCR products were re-amplified in a nested PCR using gene-specific primer 3 (GSP3, Online Resource 3) and the abridged universal amplification primer (AUAP) provided by the kit. The final PCR products were submitted for next generation sequencing.

Antisense oriented 5′RACE

5′ RACE for novel antisense transcripts was performed using the 5′ RACE System according to manufacturer instructions (Invitrogen cat#18374-058). Briefly, strand-specific cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total human brain RNA (Clontech) using gene-specific primers (GSP1, Online Resource 3) located in exon 1, exon 5 and exon 17, thereby spanning the entire locus of interest. cDNA was tailed with TdT enzyme and amplified using gene-specific primer 2 (GSP2, Online Resource 3) and AAP. PCR products were re-amplified with gene-specific primer 3 (GSP3, Online Resource 3) and AUAP. The final PCR products obtained from RACE experiments in the aforementioned regions of the locus were pooled and submitted for next generation sequencing.

Sense oriented 3′RACE

The 3′RACE protocol is based on the concept that messenger RNAs are polyadenylated transcripts and can be converted, via the reverse transcription step, to cDNA using a 3′RACE adapter primer that binds the polyadenylated tail (polyA) of the RNA. Certain noncoding RNAs are polyadenylated while others are not, and the 3′RACE protocol (Ambion cat#AM1700) can only detect polyA transcripts. RNA that is not polyadenylated cannot be detected by this method.

Following reverse transcription, the cDNA is used in the following amplification steps: a first round of PCR was performed using the 3′RACE Outer primer (provided by the kit) and a gene-specific primer for the sense noncoding RNA located 1 kb upstream of the TSS (Online Resource 4). An additional PCR step was performed using the 3′RACE Inner primer and another gene specific primer. Nested PCR DNA products were submitted for next generation sequencing.

Antisense oriented 3′RACE

Total Human Brain RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol as described above for 3′RACE-sense (Ambion cat#AM1700). The first round of PCR was performed using primers located in exon1, exon5 and exon17 in order to ensure coverage of the entire locus. Nested PCR was performed using inner gene specific primers located in the previously mentioned regions (Online Resource 4). PCR products from all regions of the locus were pooled and submitted for next generation sequencing.

Next generation sequencing

The reads coming from sequencing of 5′- and 3′RACE PCR products from Hiseq2000 sequencer were prepared for Alignment by trimming the adapters from the beginning and the end of the reads using PERL programs. Mapping of the reads coming from the sequencing of 5′- and 3′RACE PCR products was conducted using version 2.0.1 of TopHat, using default settings for Illumina reads. All reads were aligned to the hg19 assembly version (GRCh37) of the human genome and the prebuilt index of the hg19 genome assembly (TopHat) was acquired from the TopHat homepage (

Collection of tissue samples

19 human brain tissue samples were obtained from the NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD (Online Resource 5). RNA was extracted from tissue using the Trizol-Chloroform protocol and DNAse treated.

RNA from patient brain tissue and RNA from patient blood

RNA from the cerebellum of 4 full mutation patients (MIND1031-09LZ, MIND1031-08GP, MIND1033-08WS, MINDJS-03) was provided courtesy of Dr. Tassone, UC Davis, MIND Institute, CA. Detailed information about patient’s samples can be found in Online Resource 5.

Blood from 2 control (616-11-ST, 378-11-JM), 2 premutation (288-12-JC, 453-12-EG) and 2 full mutation (22-12-FD, 294-12-LP) patients was provided courtesy of Dr. Tassone and it was processed to extract RNA (Tempus tubes, Applied Biosystems) according to University of California, Davis, Institutional Review Board-approved human subject protocols.

CDNA synthesis and quantitative PCR

The two novel transcripts, FMR5 and FMR6, were validated in several human brain regions. Strand specific reverse transcription (RT) was performed on 200 ng of commercial RNA (Clontech cat #636530, #636593, #636535, #636563, #636564, #636526, #636570, #636561) to make cDNA specific for FMR5 and FMR6. To rule out DNA contamination in the RNA samples, we included a “No RT” condition, in which the reverse transcriptase enzyme was omitted from the reaction. The primers used in the RT are reported in Online Resource 6.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to compare the expression of FMR5 and FMR6 in commercially available RNA from several brain regions (Clontech), between human brain specimens and lymphocytes from control, premutation and full mutation individuals. FMR5 was measured using a custom TaqMan probe while FMR4 and FMR6 were quantified using SYBR Green, and the primers used were validated by melting curve. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and cyclophilin were used as housekeeping genes for expression normalization. QPCR data were analyzed by Delta Delta Ct method. Primers are listed in Online Resource 6.


The previous work reporting the presence of the antisense lncRNAs called ASFMR1 and FMR4 was performed in neuroblastoma (Khalil et al. 2008) and lymphoblastoid cell lines (Ladd et al. 2007), which display different epigenetic signatures than normal human brain potentially occluding discovery of additional transcripts. Here we attempted to identify novel transcripts derived from the FMR1 locus in human brain from unaffected, FXS and FXTAS patients. We screened the FMR1 locus for antisense transcripts by combining rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) with next generation sequencing to determine the 5′ and 3′ends of novel transcripts. This technique, also called Deep-RACE, was also applied to search for sense-oriented lncRNAs upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) of FMR1. Sense oriented lncRNAs overlapping gene promoters (Han et al. 2007; Kurokawa 2011; Martianov et al. 2007; Song et al. 2012) have been shown to regulate transcription initiation (Martianov et al. 2007; Song et al. 2012) and may therefore contribute to FMR1 gene dysregulation in FXS/FXTAS.

We interrogated the entire FMR1 locus by performing 5′- and 3′RACE spanning four different regions: the FMR1 promoter (up to 1 kb from the TSS), exon 1, exon 5 and exon 17. Our choice to explore these regions was based on reported expressed sequence tags antisense to the FMR1 locus. We confirmed RACE-PCR amplification of novel transcripts by capillary electrophoresis (Online Resource 1). These RACE PCR products were subjected to paired-end sequencing on Illumina’s HiSeq2000 sequencer. This procedure identified two novel noncoding RNAs, FMR5 (GenBank KC894604) and FMR6 (GenBank KC894603). FMR5 is a sense-oriented, unspliced 800 nt long transcript whose 5′-end maps approximately 1 kb upstream of the TSS of FMR1 (Fig. 1a, Online Resource 2). We were unable to obtain 3′RACE products for FMR5. One possible reason is that the high GC content in the promoter and 5′UTR of FMR1 interfered with the RACE reaction. FMR6 is a spliced 600 nt long antisense transcript whose sequence is entirely complementary to the 3′ region of FMR1. It begins in the 3′UTR and ends in exon 15 of FMR1 (Fig. 1b, Online Resource 2). Interestingly, sequencing reads for FMR6 align only to the exons of FMR1, indicating that the transcript is spliced and that FMR6 and FMR1 share the same splice junctions.
Fig. 1

Alignment of Deep-RACE results to the FMR1 locus. The reads obtained by Deep-RACE were visualized using the IGV (Integrative Genomic Viewer) program after their alignment to the human genome, and appear as grey bars above the schematic of the FMR1 gene. a Those located in the promoter of FMR1 are the result of the 5′RACE, and represent a partial sequence of FMR5, the sense transcript. b The reads that map to exon 15, exon 16, exon 17 and the 3′UTR of FMR1 represent the antisense transcript, FMR6, and result from 5′ and 3′ RACE deep sequencing

By definition, a noncoding RNA is a transcript that lacks an open reading frame (ORF) and is therefore not translated. In eukaryotes, protein-coding transcripts commonly contain an ORF >300 nucleotides (100 amino acids). We used the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI’s) “ORF Finder” to determine ORFs in our two novel transcripts. FMR6 was found to contain a few short ORFs (~130 nt) (Online Resource 3). FMR5 contained a short ORF of 114nt and one of 459 nt potentially encoding a protein of 153 amino acids (Online Resource 3).

To explore the possibility that this hypothetical protein is functional, we performed homology searches using the NCBI tool BLASTP. This query detected no putative conserved domains in any of the available databases (nr, refseq_protein, swissprot, pat, pdb and env_nr). Lack of homologous proteins and protein domains suggests that this sequence is unlikely to encode a functional protein. As a complementary strategy, we analyzed its potential domain profile using the Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool (Geer et al. 2002). This search also resulted in no hits, further supporting the idea that the 459aa ORF does not encode a functional protein.

We next assessed FMR5 and FMR6 expression in various human brain regions. FMR5 and FMR6 expression was detected at low levels in comparison to housekeeping genes in adult human cerebellum, frontal and temporal lobes, occipital and cerebral cortices and hippocampus, suggesting their presence in most adult brain regions (Fig. 2). The two transcripts were also expressed in fetal total brain RNA (Fig. 2); however, we do not yet have evidence for a developmental function of these transcripts.
Fig. 2

FMR5 and FMR6 are widely expressed in the human brain. Expression of FMR5 (a) and FMR6 (b) was measured in RNA from human cerebellum, cerebral cortex, occipital pole, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, hippocampus and total fetal brain with qPCR. Data were normalized to expression of the housekeeping gene, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD). Error bars represent the standard deviation of four technical replicates

To explore the possibility that these novel transcripts contribute to FXS pathogenesis, we assessed FMR5 and FMR6 expression in post mortem brain tissue from full and premutation individuals and unaffected controls. RNA expression was quantified in tissue from 11 controls of mixed gender, 7 male full mutation (FM) and 5 male premutation (PM) individuals. On average, FMR5 expression did not differ significantly between full mutation, premutation and control samples (Fig. 3a). However, FMR6 expression was significantly decreased in both the full mutation and premutation groups compared to controls, with the exception of sample #NICHD1421, which expresses FMR1 at levels similar to controls (Fig. 3b). All other full mutation samples have, as expected, reduced expression of FMR1 (Fig. 3c). We also determined expression levels of FMR4, a lncRNA previously reported by us (Khalil et al. 2008), in patient brain tissue. FMR4 was not detectable in full mutation (FM) samples, and its expression was increased in premutation (PM) samples compared to controls (Fig. 3d). A no-RT negative control was included in the detection of all ncRNA transcripts to ensure that the signal was not accounted for by genomic DNA contamination. The levels of FMR1, FMR4, FMR5 and FMR6 were variable in FXS and premutation brain samples. It is likely that differences in the number of repeats, extent of DNA methylation or extent of histone modifications causes this variability. Variable expression levels of these transcripts may translate into different clinical outcomes. These lncRNAs may thus be useful as biomarkers for FXS and FXTAS. To determine whether lncRNA expression is linked to clinical phenotype, it is necessary to measure these transcripts in a large cohort of patients, and blood presents the most practical option for both experimental and potential prognostic purposes.
Fig. 3

Expression of FMR5, FMR6, FMR1 and FMR4 in the brain tissue of control, full mutation and premutation individuals. Expression of FMR5 (a), FMR6 (b), FMR1 (c) and FMR4 (d) was measured in control, full mutation and premutation brain tissue by qPCR. Data were normalized to expression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), the housekeeping gene. In each panel, error bars for individual patients represent the standard deviation of four technical replicates. For mean expression values, error bars represent the standard deviation within control, FM and PM groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, NS not significant as determined by Student’s t test

To determine whether we can detect these novel lncRNAs in blood samples, we measured FMR4, FMR5 and FMR6 expression in RNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes in a limited number of patients (control n = 2, premutation n = 2, full mutation n = 2) by strand-specific reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). All control and PM samples demonstrated robust FMR1 expression; additionally, a moderate level of FMR1 mRNA was detected in one of two FM patient samples, likely due to mosaicism (Fig. 4a). Expression of FMR4, FMR5, and FMR6 was also detectable in the majority of patient leukocyte RNA samples albeit expression levels were lower than those of FMR1 (Fig. 4b–d). These results establish the feasibility of conducting studies correlating expression levels of FMR4, FMR5, and FMR6 with clinical outcomes in FXS and FXTAS patients.
Fig. 4

FMR1, FMR4, FMR5 and FMR6 are detectable in peripheral blood leukocytes. Expression of FMR1 (a), FMR4 (b), FMR5 (c) and FMR6 (d) RNA was measured in leukocytes from the peripheral blood of control, full mutation and premutation individuals. Data were normalized to the housekeeping gene cyclophilin (CYC). Error bars represent the standard deviation of four technical replicates


In recent years, the importance of lncRNAs in many aspects of cell biology has received increasing attention from the scientific community. For decades, these transcripts were regarded as transcriptional noise, and thus their role in many disease processes was overlooked. Growing evidence points to a multitude of functions performed by lncRNA, including regulation of transcription and chromatin remodeling (Lee 2012). Here we report the discovery of two novel transcripts that originate from the FMR1 locus, adding complexity to a locus already known to produce other lncRNAs (Khalil et al. 2008; Kumari and Usdin 2010; Ladd et al. 2007) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

The transcriptional landscape of the FMR1 gene locus is complex. Graphical representation of the previously described and newly reported lncRNAs expressed from the FMR1 locus. FMR5 is transcribed from the FMR1 promoter in the sense direction, beginning around 1 kb upstream from the FMR1 transcription start site. FMR6 is an antisense-oriented lncRNA produced from the 3′UTR of FMR1

The first lncRNA we report, FMR5, is a sense-oriented transcript that overlaps the FMR1 promoter. The FMR5 transcription start site (TSS) is located 1 kb upstream of the FMR1 TSS. FMR5 showed similar expression levels in control, FM and PM brain tissue, suggesting that FMR5 transcription remains independent of chromatin modifications in FM and PM carriers. This is consistent with the finding that in FXS repressive chromatin marks such as trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and trimethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20me3) associate with exon 1 of FMR1, which contains the CGG repeats, but do not associate with the promoter region (Kumari and Usdin 2010). On the other hand, levels of three active chromatin marks, H3 acetylation (H3Ac), H4 acetylation (H4Ac) and H3K4 dimethylation (H3K4me2), were reportedly lowered at the FMR1 promoter in FXS (Gheldof et al. 2006). Furthermore, Kumari et al. (2010) reported the presence of uncharacterized antisense lncRNAs in the FMR1 promoter of both normal and full mutation cells, suggesting that the presence of repressive histone marks in the FMR1 locus would not necessarily inhibit the transcription of low abundance transcripts such as FMR5.

FMR6 is a spliced antisense-oriented lncRNA that overlaps exons 15-17 as well as the 3′UTR of FMR1. Unexpectedly, the splicing sites in FMR6 correspond exactly to those of FMR1. Although very little is known about the consensus sequences for splicing of noncoding RNAs, it is possible that the reverse complement of the canonical sites in FMR1 are being recognized as non-canonical consensus sequences by the splicing machinery. Programs such as “Human Splicing Finder” ( can be used to predict non-canonical splicing sites by incorporating matrices for auxiliary sequences (Desmet et al. 2009). Further studies are required to address this possibility.

Our data show that FMR6 expression is significantly downregulated in FXS brain samples, as is expected due to the reported decrease in H4Ac and H3K4me2 and increase in H3K9me2 throughout the FMR1 locus, including the 3′ region of FMR1 (Gheldof et al. 2006). However, DNA methylation is restricted to the CGG repeat region at 5′ end of the gene. One full mutation case in our study, NICHD#1421, displayed robust FMR1 expression in addition to higher expression of FMR6 compared to other FM patients. It is likely that in this case the 3′UTR is unaffected by the repressive chromatin modifications discussed above. Therefore it is possible that the observed reduction in FMR6 expression is a consequence of histone changes associated with the FM, rather than the DNA methylation responsible for FMR1 silencing.

An unanticipated result is that FMR6 expression is reduced in premutation-range samples; however, the chromatin marks associated with the 3′ end of FMR1 in premutation carriers are yet to be described. As mentioned previously, premutation-range expansions in the CGG repeat region are reported to result in an open chromatin state and increased FMR1 transcription (Tan et al. 2009). Our data suggest that in addition, the premutation-range CGG expansion somehow influences transcription or chromatin state near the far-distal 3′ end of the gene at the premutation stage. Finally, we found that FMR4, similarly to FMR1, is downregulated in brain from FM patients and upregulated in PM carriers as we previously reported in blood leukocytes (Khalil et al. 2008).

As discussed above, FMR5 and FMR6 have distinct expression patterns, and additional studies are necessary to clarify whether any potential regulatory function of each transcript may contribute to FXS/FXTAS phenotypes. FMR6 is complementary to the 3′ region of FMR1 and may therefore bind to the FMR1 mRNA, thereby regulating FMR1′s stability, splicing, subcellular localization and translational efficiency. These regulatory functions have been described for other lncRNAs (reviewed in (Faghihi and Wahlestedt 2009)). For instance, stability of BACE1 mRNA is positively regulated by an antisense lncRNA to BACE1 called BACE1AS (Faghihi et al. 2008). The possibility that FMR6 regulates FMR1 mRNA splicing may be relevant since extensive alternative splicing of FMR1 has been demonstrated (Huang et al. 1996; Sittler et al. 1996). Finally, as FMR6 overlaps two microRNA binding sites for miR-19a and miR-19b in the 3′UTR of FMR1 (Edbauer et al. 2010), it is possible that this lncRNA can modulate stability or translational efficiency of FMR1 through interference with microRNA binding.

The fact that FMR1-derived lncRNAs are differentially expressed in FXS and FXTAS suggests their usefulness as biomarkers for these diseases. The use of lncRNAs as biomarkers for human disease is a rather novel concept. LncRNAs have emerged as novel diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers in bodily fluid samples of cancer patients. One example is the lncRNA prostate cancer antigen 3, which can be detected in urine samples and has been shown to improve diagnosis of prostate cancer (de Kok et al. 2002; Reis and Verjovski-Almeida 2012). Investigating the relationship between differential lncRNA expression and clinical outcomes requires screening a large number of patients with various degrees of defined FXS or FXTAS symptoms. We have demonstrated through our six-patient pilot study that such a screening can be performed, as FMR4, FMR5 and FMR6 are detectable in peripheral blood leukocytes. If variability in expression of these transcripts in FM and PM individuals correlates with clinical variability, it may be feasible to stratify FXS or FXTAS patients for early intervention and improve clinical outcomes.

In this study we used an innovative approach called Deep-RACE, which combines RACE and next generation sequencing (Olivarius et al. 2009) to identify novel transcripts in high-throughput manner. This technique is highly sensitive and enables detection of very low abundance transcripts. Although our study uncovered two new lncRNAs, it is possible that we might have missed additional FMR1-derived transcripts because the RACE reaction is blocked by DNA sequences with high GC content, such as found in the promoter and 5′UTR of the FMR1 gene. While there may well be other transcripts that are yet to be identified, this report of two novel lncRNAs, FMR5 and FMR6, further highlights the complexity of the FMR1 transcriptional landscape (Fig. 5). The functional properties of these lncRNAs remain to be explored. Should they prove to be functional, we may begin to see Fragile X Syndrome and its associated disorders as “single-locus” diseases in which multiple entities are affected by a repeat expansion in a single gene.



We are grateful to Dr. Flora Tassone (UC Davis) for providing us with RNA from brain and leukocytes of controls, premutation and full mutation individuals. Thank you also to Dr. Tassone, Dr. Zeier and to Abigail Rupchock for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (grant number 5R01MH084880-05).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

439_2013_1356_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 6413 kb)


  1. Allingham-Hawkins DJ, Babul-Hirji R, Chitayat D, Holden JJ, Yang KT, Lee C, Hudson R, Gorwill H, Nolin SL, Glicksman A et al (1999) Fragile X premutation is a significant risk factor for premature ovarian failure: the international collaborative POF in Fragile X study–preliminary data. Am J Med Genet 83:322–325PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antar LN, Dictenberg JB, Plociniak M, Afroz R, Bassell GJ (2005) Localization of FMRP-associated mRNA granules and requirement of microtubules for activity-dependent trafficking in hippocampal neurons. Genes Brain Behav 4:350–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banfai B, Jia H, Khatun J, Wood E, Risk B, Gundling WE Jr, Kundaje A, Gunawardena HP, Yu Y, Xie L et al (2012) Long noncoding RNAs are rarely translated in two human cell lines. Genome Res 22:1646–1657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown V, Small K, Lakkis L, Feng Y, Gunter C, Wilkinson KD, Warren ST (1998) Purified recombinant FMRp exhibits selective RNA binding as an intrinsic property of the fragile X mental retardation protein. J Biol Chem 273:15521–15527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen L, Toth M (2001) Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli. Neuroscience 103:1043–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng J, Kapranov P, Drenkow J, Dike S, Brubaker S, Patel S, Long J, Stern D, Tammana H, Helt G et al (2005) Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution. Science 308:1149–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho DH, Thienes CP, Mahoney SE, Analau E, Filippova GN, Tapscott SJ (2005) Antisense transcription and heterochromatin at the DM1 CTG repeats are constrained by CTCF. Mol Cell 20:483–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coffee B, Zhang F, Warren ST, Reines D (1999) Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells. Nat Genet 22:98–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coffee B, Zhang F, Ceman S, Warren ST, Reines D (2002) Histone modifications depict an aberrantly heterochromatinized FMR1 gene in fragile x syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 71:923–932PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Kok JB, Verhaegh GW, Roelofs RW, Hessels D, Kiemeney LA, Aalders TW, Swinkels DW, Schalken JA (2002) DD3(PCA3), a very sensitive and specific marker to detect prostate tumors. Cancer Res 62:2695–2698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Beroud G, Claustres M, Beroud C (2009) Human splicing finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37(9):e67PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, Tanzer A, Lagarde J, Lin W, Schlesinger F et al (2012) Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature 489:101–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edbauer D, Neilson JR, Foster KA, Wang CF, Seeburg DP, Batterton MN, Tada T, Dolan BM, Sharp PA, Sheng M (2010) Regulation of synaptic structure and function by FMRP-associated microRNAs miR-125b and miR-132. Neuron 65:373–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faghihi MA, Wahlestedt C (2009) Regulatory roles of natural antisense transcripts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:637–643PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faghihi MA, Modarresi F, Khalil AM, Wood DE, Sahagan BG, Morgan TE, Finch CE, St Laurent G 3rd, Kenny PJ, Wahlestedt C (2008) Expression of a noncoding RNA is elevated in Alzheimer’s disease and drives rapid feed-forward regulation of beta-secretase. Nat Med 14:723–730PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisch GS, Hao HK, Bakker C, Oostra BA (1999) Learning and memory in the FMR1 knockout mouse. Am J Med Genet 84:277–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia-Arocena D, Hagerman PJ (2010) Advances in understanding the molecular basis of FXTAS. Hum Mol Genet 19:R83–R89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geer LY, Domrachev M, Lipman DJ, Bryant SH (2002) CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res 12:1619–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gheldof N, Tabuchi TM, Dekker J (2006) The active FMR1 promoter is associated with a large domain of altered chromatin conformation with embedded local histone modifications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12463–12468PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godfraind JM, Reyniers E, De Boulle K, D’Hooge R, De Deyn PP, Bakker CE, Oostra BA, Kooy RF, Willems PJ (1996) Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus of fragile X knockout mice. Am J Med Genet 64:246–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, Tassone F, Wilson R, Hills J, Grigsby J, Gage B, Hagerman PJ (2001) Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 57:127–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han J, Kim D, Morris KV (2007) Promoter-associated RNA is required for RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12422–12427PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinton VJ, Brown WT, Wisniewski K, Rudelli RD (1991) Analysis of neocortex in three males with the fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 41:289–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hornstra IK, Nelson DL, Warren ST, Yang TP (1993) High resolution methylation analysis of the FMR1 gene trinucleotide repeat region in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2:1659–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang T, Li LY, Shen Y, Qin XB, Pang ZL, Wu GY (1996) Alternative splicing of the FMR1 gene in human fetal brain neurons. Am J Med Genet 64:252–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irwin SA, Galvez R, Greenough WT (2000) Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome. Cereb Cortex 10:1038–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenneson A, Zhang F, Hagedorn CH, Warren ST (2001) Reduced FMRP and increased FMR1 transcription is proportionally associated with CGG repeat number in intermediate-length and premutation carriers. Hum Mol Genet 10:1449–1454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khalil AM, Faghihi MA, Modarresi F, Brothers SP, Wahlestedt C (2008) A novel RNA transcript with antiapoptotic function is silenced in fragile X syndrome. PLoS One 3:e1486PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumari D, Usdin K (2010) The distribution of repressive histone modifications on silenced FMR1 alleles provides clues to the mechanism of gene silencing in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 19:4634–4642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurokawa R (2011) Promoter-associated long noncoding RNAs repress transcription through a RNA binding protein TLS. Adv Exp Med Biol 722:196–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ladd PD, Smith LE, Rabaia NA, Moore JM, Georges SA, Hansen RS, Hagerman RJ, Tassone F, Tapscott SJ, Filippova GN (2007) An antisense transcript spanning the CGG repeat region of FMR1 is upregulated in premutation carriers but silenced in full mutation individuals. Hum Mol Genet 16:3174–3187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee JT (2012) Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Science 338:1435–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez Castel A, Cleary JD, Pearson CE (2010) Repeat instability as the basis for human diseases and as a potential target for therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:165–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martianov I, Ramadass A, Serra Barros A, Chow N, Akoulitchev A (2007) Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene by a non-coding interfering transcript. Nature 445:666–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mattick JS (2005) The functional genomics of noncoding RNA. Science 309:1527–1528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller LJ, McIntosh DN, McGrath J, Shyu V, Lampe M, Taylor AK, Tassone F, Neitzel K, Stackhouse T, Hagerman RJ (1999) Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: a preliminary report. Am J Med Genet 83:268–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mirkin SM (2007) Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 447:932–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moseley ML, Zu T, Ikeda Y, Gao W, Mosemiller AK, Daughters RS, Chen G, Weatherspoon MR, Clark HB, Ebner TJ et al (2006) Bidirectional expression of CUG and CAG expansion transcripts and intranuclear polyglutamine inclusions in spinocerebellar ataxia type 8. Nat Genet 38:758–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Donnell WT, Warren ST (2002) A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:315–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olivarius S, Plessy C, Carninci P (2009) High-throughput verification of transcriptional starting sites by Deep-RACE. Biotechniques 46:130–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pastori C, Wahlestedt C (2012) Involvement of long noncoding RNAs in diseases affecting the central nervous system. RNA Biol 9:860–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reis EM, Verjovski-Almeida S (2012) Perspectives of long non-coding RNAs in cancer diagnostics. Front Genet 3:32PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi Y, Alpatov R, Wagner U, Nakamoto-Kinoshita M, Ye Z, Luu Y, Armache KJ, Simon MD, Stuetzer A, Greer EL et al (2012) The fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP plays a role in the DNA damage response. Faseb J 26:88.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sittler A, Devys D, Weber C, Mandel JL (1996) Alternative splicing of exon 14 determines nuclear or cytoplasmic localisation of FMR1 protein isoforms. Hum Mol Genet 5:95–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Song X, Wang X, Arai S, Kurokawa R (2012) Promoter-associated noncoding RNA from the CCND1 promoter. Methods Mol Biol 809:609–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stafstrom CE, Hagerman PJ, Pessah IN (2012) Pathophysiology of epilepsy in autism spectrum disorders. In: Noebels JL, Avoli M, Rogawski MA, Olsen RW, Delgado-Escueta AV (eds) Jasper’s basic mechanisms of the epilepsies, Bethesda MDGoogle Scholar
  47. Sutcliffe JS, Nelson DL, Zhang F, Pieretti M, Caskey CT, Saxe D, Warren ST (1992) DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1:397–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tan H, Li H, Jin P (2009) RNA-mediated pathogenesis in fragile X-associated disorders. Neurosci Lett 466:103–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, Gane LW, Godfrey TE, Hagerman PJ (2000) Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 66:6–15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium (1994) FMR1 knockout mice: a model to study fragile X mental retardation. Cell 78:23–33Google Scholar
  51. Weiler IJ, Irwin SA, Klintsova AY, Spencer CM, Brazelton AD, Miyashiro K, Comery TA, Patel B, Eberwine J, Greenough WT (1997) Fragile X mental retardation protein is translated near synapses in response to neurotransmitter activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:5395–5400PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan BX, Ma JX (2012) Promoter-associated RNAs and promoter-targeted RNAs. CMLS 69:2833–2842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Pastori
    • 1
  • Veronica J. Peschansky
    • 1
  • Deborah Barbouth
    • 2
  • Arpit Mehta
    • 3
  • Jose P. Silva
    • 1
  • Claes Wahlestedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Hussman Institute for Human GenomicsUniversity of Miami, Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Division of Clinical and Translational Genetics, Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of Miami, Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Hussman Institute for Human GenomicsUniversity of Miami, Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations