Human Genetics

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 175–186 | Cite as

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: State of the ART 2011

Review Paper

Abstract

For the last 20 years, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been mostly performed on cleavage stage embryos after the biopsy of 1–2 cells and PCR and FISH have been used for the diagnosis. The main indications have been single gene disorders and inherited chromosome abnormalities. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy is a technique that has used PGD technology to examine chromosomes in embryos from couples undergoing IVF with the aim of helping select the chromosomally ‘best’ embryo for transfer. It has been applied to patients of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male factor infertility. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that PGS performed on cleavage stage embryos for a variety of indications does not improve delivery rates. At the cleavage stage, the cells biopsied from the embryo are often not representative of the rest of the embryo due to chromosomal mosaicism. There has therefore been a move towards blastocyst and polar body biopsy, depending on the indication and regulations in specific countries (in some countries, biopsy of embryos is not allowed). Blastocyst biopsy has an added advantage as vitrification of blastocysts, even post biopsy, has been shown to be a very successful method of cryopreserving embryos. However, mosaicism is also observed in blastocysts. There have been dramatic changes in the method of diagnosing small numbers of cells for PGD. Both array-comparative genomic hybridisation and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been introduced clinically for PGD and PGS. For PGD, the use of SNP arrays brings with it ethical concerns as a large amount of genetic information will be available from each embryo. For PGS, RCTs need to be conducted using both array-CGH and SNP arrays to determine if either will result in an increase in delivery rates.

References

  1. Abou-Sleiman PM, Apessos A, Harper JC, Serhal P, Delhanty JDA (2002) Pregnancy following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Crouzon syndrome. Mol Human Reprod 8:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D (2011) First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 26(6):1560–1574 (Epub 2011 Mar 29)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arneson N, Hughes S, Houlston R, Done S (2008) Whole-genome amplification by improved primer extension preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR). CSH Protoc. Jan 1, 2008:pdb.prot4921. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4921
  4. Baart EB, van den Berg I, Martini E, Eussen HJ, Fauser BC, Van Opstal D (2007) FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: the added value of extended aneuploidy detection. Prenat Diagn 27(1):55–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blockeel C, Schutyser V, De Vos A, Verpoest W, De Vos M, Staessen C et al (2008) Prospectively randomised controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 17:848–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brezina PR, Benner A, Rechitsky S, Kuliev A, Pomerantseva E, Pauling D, Kearns WG (2011) Single-gene testing combined with single nucleotide polymorphism microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy: a novel approach in optimizing pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 95(5):1786.e5–1786.e8 (Epub 2010 Dec 8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruder CE, Hirvelä C, Tapia-Paez I, Fransson I, Segraves R, Hamilton G, Zhang XX, Evans DG, Wallace AJ, Baser ME, Zucman-Rossi J, Hergersberg M, Boltshauser E, Papi L, Rouleau GA, Poptodorov G, Jordanova A, Rask-Andersen H, Kluwe L, Mautner V, Sainio M, Hung G, Mathiesen T, Möller C, Pulst SM, Harder H, Heiberg A, Honda M, Niimura M, Sahlén S, Blennow E, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Dumanski JP (2001) High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH. Hum Mol Genet 10(3):271–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burtt NP (2011) Whole-genome amplification using Φ29 DNA polymerase. Cold SpringHarb Protoc. 2011 Jan 1;2011:pdb.prot5552. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5552
  9. Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, Lyu SW, Lee WS, Yoon TK (2011) Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(4):369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coonen E, Dumoulin JCM, Ramaekers FCS, Hopman AHN (1994) Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Hum Reprod 9:533–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, Pickering S, Rutherford A, BFS ACE (2008) Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum Fertil (Camb) 11(3):131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Wert G, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H (2007) The future (r)evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis/human leukocyte antigen testing: ethical reflections. Stem Cells 25(9):2167–2172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, Wu X, Faruqi AF, Bray-Ward P, Sun Z, Zong Q, Du Y, Du J, Driscoll M, Song W, Kingsmore SF, Egholm M, Lasken RS (2002) Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(8):5261–5266 (PubMed PMID: 11959976, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC122757)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, Peeraer K, Vanneste E, Meeuwis L, Meuleman C, Frijns JP, Vermeesch JR, D’Hooghe TM (2010) Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 93(2):364–373 (Epub 2009 Feb 26. PubMed PMID: 19249029)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhanjal S, Kakourou G, Mamas T, Saleh N, Doshi A, Gotts S, Nuttall S, Fordham K, Serhal P, Delhanty J, Harper JC, SenGupta S (2007) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma predisposition. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1090–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumoulin JC, Bras M, Coonen E, Dreesen J, Geraedts JP, Evers JL (1998) Effect of Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium on the biopsy procedure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Hum Reprod 13(10):2880–2883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiegler H, Geigl JB, Langer S, Rigler D, Porter K, Unger K, Carter NP, Speicher MR (2007) High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells. Nucleic Acids Res 35(3):e15 (Epub 2006 Dec 18)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Karadayi H, Berkil H, Karlikaya G, Sertyel S, Podini D, Baldi M, Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Kahraman S (2004) Development and clinical application of a strategy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders combined with HLA matching. Mol Hum Reprod 10(6):445–460 (Epub 2004 Mar 25. PubMed PMID: 15044607)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Nuccitelli A, De Palma R, Kahraman S, Iacobelli M, Trengia V, Caserta D, Bonu MA, Borini A, Baldi M (2006) Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single gene disorders. Hum Reprod 21(3):670–684 (Epub 2005 Nov 25. PubMed PMID: 16311287)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K (2011) PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 26(7):1925–1935 (Epub 2011 Apr 12. PubMed PMID: 21489979)Google Scholar
  21. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall NN, Mania A, Griffiths T, Gordon A, Wells D (2011) Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod 26(2):480–490 (Epub 2010 Dec 8. PubMed PMID: 21147821)Google Scholar
  22. Fridstrom M, Ahrlund-Richter L, Iwarsson E et al (2001) Clinical outcome of treatment cycles using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for structural chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 21(9):781–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, Harper J, Montag M, Repping S, Schmutzler A (2010) What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!. Hum Reprod 25(3):575–577 (Epub 2009 Dec 23)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glentis S, SenGupta S, Thornhill A, Wang R, Craft I, Harper JC (2009) Molecular comparison of single cell MDA products derived from different cell types. Reprod Biomed Online 19(1):89–98 (PubMed PMID: 19573296)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, Van Steirteghem A, Bertrand C, Liebaers I, Devroey P, Sermon K (2008) Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 23(3):481–492 (Epub 2007 Dec 22)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Harper JC, Wilton LJ, Atkinson G, Soussis I, Wells D, Kontogianni E, Tarin J, Geber S, et al. (1994) Clinical experience with preimplantation diagnosis of sex by dual fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet 11(3):132–143. (PubMed PMID: 7827442)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, Griffin DK (2010) Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet 47(10):651–658 (Epub 2009 Oct 25)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, Hillensjö T, Nilsson L, Stevic J et al (2008) Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod 23:2806–2812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RM, Handyside AH (1990) Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod 5(6):708–814 (PubMed PMID: 2254404)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Harper JC (2009) In: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Harper JC, Harton G (2010) The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Fertil Steril 94(4):1173–1177 (Epub 2010 Jun 25. Review)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harper JC, Coonen E, Ramaekers FCS, Delhanty JDA, Handyside AH, Winston RML, Hopman AHN (1994) Identification of the sex of human preimplantation embryos in two hours using an improved spreading method and fluorescent in situ hybridisation using directly labelled probes. Hum Reprod 9:721–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Harper JC, Coonen E, Handyside AH, Winston RML, Hopman AHN, Delhanty JDA (1995) Mosaicism of autosomes and sex chromosomes in morphologically normal, monospermic, preimplantation human embryos. Prenat Diagn 15:41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harper JC, de Die-Smulders C, Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C, Repping S, Scriven PN, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, Van Rij MC, Viville S, Wilton L, Sermon KD (2008) ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VII: Cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005. Human Reprod 23(4):741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harper JC, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Harton G, Moutou C, Pehlivan T, Traeger-Synodinos J, Van Rij M, Goossens V (2010a) ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection X: cycles from January to December 2007 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2008. Human Reprod 25(11):2685–2707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Geraedts J, Goossens V, Harton G, Pehlivan Budak T, Renwick P, Sengupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vesela K (2010b) What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee. Hum Reprod 25(4):821–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harper JC, Sengupta S, Vesela K, Thornhill A, Dequeker E, Coonen E, Morris MA (2010c) Accreditation of the PGD laboratory. Hum Reprod 25(4):1051–1065 (Epub 2010 Jan 23. PubMed PMID: 20097923)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harton G, Magli C, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmon J, Harper JC (2010a) ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group-Best Practice Guidelines for Polar Body and Embryo Biopsy for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis/Screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod 26(1):41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Moutou C, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, Harper JC (2010b) European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod 26(1):33–40 (Epub 2010 Oct 21. PubMed PMID: 20966462)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heiskanen MA, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Khan J, Adler KE, Trent JM, Meltzer PS (2000) Detection of gene amplification by genomic hybridization to cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res 60(4):799–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hellani A, Coskun S, Tbakhi A, Al-Hassan S (2005) Clinical application of multiple displacement amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online 10(3):376–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S (2008) Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod BioMed Online 17:841–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hodgson G, Hager JH, Volik S, Hariono S, Wernick M, Moore D, Nowak N, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Collins C, Hanahan D, Gray JW (2001) Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas. Nat Genet 29(4):459–64. Erratum in: Nat Genet 29(4):491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes S, Arneson N, Done S, Squire J (2005) The use of whole genome amplification in the study of human disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 88(1):173–189 ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jansen RPS, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ (2008) What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 23:1476–1478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kakourou G, Dhanjal S, Mamas T, Gotts S, Doshi A, Fordham K, Serhal P, Ranieri DM, Delhanty JDA, Harper JC, SenGupta SB (2008) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1 in the UK. Neuromuscul Disord 18:131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kakourou G, Dhanjal S, Mamas T, Serhal P, Delhanty JD, SenGupta SB (2010) Modification of the triplet repeat primed PCR (TP-PCR) method for detection of the CTG repeat expansion in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1): application in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 94(5):1674–1679 (Epub 2010 Feb 19)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudan D (1992) Comparative genomic hybridisation for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours. Science 258:818–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kearns WG, Pen R, Benner A, Kittai A, Widra E, Leach R (2008) SNP microarray genetic analyses to determine 23-chromosome ploidy, structural chromosome aberrations and genome-wide scans to identify disease risks from a single embryonic cell, Fertil Steril S23Google Scholar
  50. Kokkali G, Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Jones GM, Cram DS, Stavrou D, Trounson AO, Kanavakis E, Pantos K (2005) Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocytes for PGD of beta-thalassaemia major. Hum Reprod 20:1855–1859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. LeCaignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, De Rycke M, Thienpont B, Debrock S, Staessen C, Moreau Y, Fryns JP, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Vermeesch JR (2006) Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 34:e68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mackie Ogilvie C, Scriven PN (2002) Meiotic outcomes in reciprocal translocation carriers ascertained in 3-day human embryos. Eur J Hum Genet 10(12):801–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR et al (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP (2005) Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 84:1628–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mersereau JE, Pergament E, Zhang X, Milad MP (2008) Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 90:1287–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD, Nasta T, Mangan P, Karande VC (2009) A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the “good prognosis” patients. Fertil Steril 91:1731–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Monk M, Muggleton-Harris A, Rawlings E, Whittingham D (1988) Preimplantation diagnosis of HPRT-deficient male, female, and carrier female mouse embryos by trophectoderm biopsy. Hum Reprod 3:377–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Monnot S, Gigarel N, Samuels DC, Burlet P, Hesters L, Frydman N, Frydman R, Kerbrat V, Funalot B, Martinovic J, Benachi A, Feingold J, Munnich A, BonnefontJP SteffannJ (2011) Segregation of mtDNA throughout human embryofetal development:m.3243A > G as a model system. Hum Mutat 32(1):116–125 PubMed PMID:21120938; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3058134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H (2009) Polar body biopsy. In: Harper J (ed) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Munne S, Weier HU, Stein J, Grifo J, Cohen J (1993) A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assist Reprod Genet 10(1):82–90 PubMed PMID: 8499685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Munné S, Dailey T, SultanKM KM, Grifo J, Cohen J (1995a) The use of first polar bodies for preimpantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 10:1015–1021Google Scholar
  62. Munné S, Sultan KM, Weier HU et al (1995b) Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172(4 Pt 1):1191–1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Munné S, Escudero T, Colls P, Xuezhong Z, Oter M, Garrisi M, Barnes F, Zouves C, Werlin L, Magli C, Cohen J (2004) Predictability of preimplantation geneticdiagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations on prospective attempts. Reprod BiomedOnline. 9(6):645–651 PubMed PMID: 15670413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pennings G, de Wert G (2003) Evolving ethics in medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 9(4):397–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20(2):207–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 23(1):41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bower B, Friedman S, Keefe DL (2009) Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Minerva Med 100(5):371–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ray PF, Handyside AH (1996) Increasing the denaturation temperature during the first cycles of amplification reduces allele dropout from single cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Mol Hum Reprod 2(3):213–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rechitsky S, Kuliev A, Sharapova T, Laziuk K, Ozen S, Barsky I, Verlinsky O, Tur-Kaspa I, Verlinsky Y (2006) Preimplantation HLA typing with aneuploidy testing.Reprod. Biomed Online 12(1):89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rechitsky S, Pomerantseva E, Pakhalchuk T, Pauling D, Verlinsky O, Kuliev A (2011) First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for de novo mutations. Reprod Biomed Online 22(4):350–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Renwick P, Trussler J, Lashwood A, Braude P, Ogilvie CM (2010) Preimplantation genetic haplotyping: 127 diagnostic cycles demonstrating a robust, efficient alternative to direct mutation testing on single cells. Reprod Biomed Online 20(4):470–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruangvutilert P, Delhanty JDA, Rodeck C, Harper JC (2000) Relative efficiency of FISH on metaphase and interphase nuclei from non-mosaic trisomic or triploid fibroblast cultures. Prenat Diagn 20:159–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munne S (2009) Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril 92:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D (2010) Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 94(5):1700–1706 (Epub 2009 Nov 25. PubMed PMID: 19939370)Google Scholar
  75. Sharp RR, McGowan ML, Verma JA, Landy DC, McAdoo S, Carson SA, Simpson JL, McCullough LB (2010) Moral attitudes and beliefs among couples pursuing PGD for sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online 21(7):838–847 (Epub 2010 Sep 26. PubMed PMID: 19249029)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spits C, Sermon K (2009) PGD for monogenic disorders: aspects of molecular biology. Prenat Diagn 29(1):50–56 Review. PubMed PMID: 19101953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al (2004) Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advance maternal age: a prospective randomize controlled trial. Hum Reprod 19:2849–2858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, Haentjens P, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I et al (2008) Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 23:2818–2825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Steffann J, Frydman N, Gigarel N, Burlet P, Ray PF, Fanchin R, Feyereisen E, Kerbrat V, Tachdjian G, Bonnefont JP, Frydman R, Munnich A (2006) Analysis of mtDNA variant segregation during early human embryonic development: a tool for successful NARP preimplantation diagnosis. J Med Genet 43(3):244–247 (Epub 2005 Sep 9. PubMed PMID: 16155197; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2563237)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevens J, Wale P, Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK (2004) Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial? A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 82:S249–S249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strom CM, Ginsberg N, Rechitsky S et al (1998) Three births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis with sequential first and second polar body analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:1298–1306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjöld M, Ponder BA, Tunnacliffe A (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13(3):718–725 PubMed PMID: 1639399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Treff NR, Su J, Mavrianos J, Bergh PA, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr (2007) Accurate 23 chromosome aneuploidy screening in human blastomeres using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays. Fertil Steril 86:S217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Treff NR, Su J, Kasabwala N, Tao X, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr (2010) Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism, microarray-based DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 93(7):2453–2455 PubMed PMID: 19896651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vajta G, Kuwayama (2006) Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology 65:236–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, Debrock S, Amyere M, Vikkula M, Schuit F, Fryns JP, Verbeke G, D’Hooghe T, Moreau Y, Vermeesch JR (2009) Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 15:577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M, Boada M, Carrera M, Santalo J, Barri PN, Menezo Y (1997) Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the human. Zygote 5:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Evsikov S, White M, Cieslak J, Lifchez A, Valle J, Moise J, Strom CM (1992) Preconception and preimplantation diagnosis for cystic fibrosis. Prenat Diagn 12(2):103–110 PubMed PMID: 1553355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Kovalinskaya L, White M, Lifchez A, Kaplan B, Moise J, Valle J, Ginsberg N, Strom C, Kuliev A (1995) Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Mol Hum Reprod 10:1923–1927Google Scholar
  90. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Evsikov S, Wolf G, White M, Lifchez A, Kaplan B, Moise J, Valle J, Ginsberg N, Strom C, Kuliev A (1998) Preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by the first- and second-polar body FISH analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 15(5):285–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R (1999) Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn 19(9):846–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L (2000) Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet 106(2):210–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Tzetis M, Palmer G, Sofocleous C, Kanavakis E (2004) Real-time PCR for single-cell genotyping in sickle cell and thalassemia syndromes as a rapid, accurate, reliable, and widely applicable protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Mutat 23(5):513–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wells D (1999) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenat Diagn 19(13):1190–1192 PubMed PMID: 10660953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wells D, Delhanty JD (2000) Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 6(11):1055–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wells D, Sherlock JK (1998) Strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders by DNA amplification. Prenat Diagn 18(13):1389–1401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JD, Munné S (2002) First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 78(3):543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wessendorf S, Fritz B, Wrobel G, Nessling M, Lampel S, Göettel D, Küepper M, Joos S, Hopman T, Kokocinski F, Döhner H, Bentz M, Schwäenen C, Lichter P (2002) Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization. Lab Invest 82(1):47–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D, Voullaire L (2001) Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. N Engl J Med 345:1537–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wilton L, Thornhill A, Traeger-Synodinos J, Sermon KD, Harper JC (2009) The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD. Hum Reprod 24(5):1221–1228 (Epub 2009 Jan 20. PubMed PMID: 19155287)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM (1990) Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 19, 344(6268):768–770Google Scholar
  102. Youssry M, Ozmen B, Zohni K, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S (2008) Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online 16(2):311–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, Hubert R, Navidi W, Arnheim N (1992) Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(13):5847–5851 PubMed PMID: 1631067; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC49394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J, Heng BC, Huang M, Ling X, Duan T, Tong GQ (2011) Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles—time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril 95(5):1691–1695 PMID: 21315339 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCL Centre for PG&D, Institute for Womens HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health UCLHLondonUK

Personalised recommendations