Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing continues to receive significant attention from both the popular press and policymakers. While the demand for these services has not, to date, been significant, it nevertheless seems likely that more and more individuals will be accessing DTC services. As a result, commentators have suggested that the DTC industry requires more oversight. A common rationale for policy action is that DTC services might cause undue anxiety. However, emerging evidence suggests that this is not the case. Indeed, it appears that genetic risk information has little impact on individual behavior or anxiety levels. Though more research is clearly needed, this type of research should inform the regulatory response to DTC services.
- Brice P (2010) Current DTC genetic testing market smaller than expected. Public Health Genomics Foundation (accessed 22 February 2011). http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/5658/
- Hall WD, Mathews R, Morley KI (2010) Being more realistic about the public health impact of genomic medicine. PLoS Med 7(10):e1000347. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000347
- Human Genetics Commission (2010) A common framework of principles for direct-to-consumer genetic testing services (accessed 22 February 2011). http://www.hgc.gov.uk/client/Content.asp?ContentId=816
- Marteau TM, French DP, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, Sutton S, Watkinson C, Attwood S, Hollands GJ (2010) Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD007275. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007275.pub2
- Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Hammitt JK, Concannon TW, Auerbach HR, Fang C, Kent DM (2010) Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents. Health Econ. doi:10.1002/hec.1704
- Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (2000) Enhancing the oversight of genetic tests: Recommendations of the SACGT. National Institutes of Health (accessed 22 February 2011). http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/sacgt/reports/oversight_report.pdf
- Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Department of Health and Human Services (accessed 22 February 2011). http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/reports/SACGHS_DTC_Report_2010.pdf
- van El CG, Cornel MC (2011) Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.176
- Vorhaus D (2011) Update: FDA taking another (public) look at DTC genetic tests. Genomics Law Report. 2011/02/08/update-fda-taking-another-public-look-at-dtc-genetic-tests/ (accessed 22 February 2011). http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/
- Wright C (2009) Ban on direct-to-consumer genetic tests in Germany. Public Health Genomics Foundation (accessed 22 February 2011). http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/4562/