Looking for race in all the wrong places: analyzing the lack of productivity in the ongoing debate about race and genetics
- 471 Downloads
The ongoing debate about the relationship between race and genetics is more than a century old and has yet to be resolved. Recent emphasis on population-based patterns in human genetic variation and the implications of those for disease susceptibility and drug response have revitalized that long-standing debate. Both sides in the debate use the same rhetorical device of treating geographic, ancestral, population-specific, and other categories as surrogates for race, but otherwise share no evidentiary standards, analytic frameworks, or scientific goals that might resolve the debate and result in some productive outcome. Setting a common goal of weighing the scientific benefits of using racial and other social heuristics with testable estimates of the potential social harms of racialization can reduce both the unreflexive use of race and other social identities in biological analyses as well as the unreflexive use of racialization in social critiques of genetics. Treating social identities used in genetic studies as objects for investigation rather than artifacts of participant self-report or researcher attribution also will reduce the extent to which genetic studies that report social identities imply that membership in social categories can be defined or predicted using genetic features.
KeywordsSocial Identity Population Stratification Social Category Genetic Finding Racial Category
This paper benefited from discussions at the Banbury Center conference, “Who are we? Kinship, ancestry, and social identity,” which was funded in part by the Richard Lounsbery Foundation.
- Blank RM, Dabady M, Citro CF (eds) (2004) Measuring racial discrimination: panel on methods for assessing discrimination. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Burchard EG, Borrell LN, Choudhry S, Naqvi M, Tsai HJ, Rodriguez-Santana JR, Chapela R, Rogers SD, Mei R, Rodriguez-Cintron W, Arena JF, Kittles R, Perez-Stable EJ, Ziv E, Risch N (2005) Latino populations: a unique opportunity for the study of race, genetics, and social environment in epidemiological research. Am J Public Health 95(12):2161–2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Choudhry S, Burchard EG, Borrell LN, Tang H, Gomez I, Naqvi M, Nazario S, Torres A, Casal J, Martinez-Cruzado JC, Ziv E, Avila PC, Rogriquez-Cintron W, Risch NJ (2006) Ancestry-environment interactions and asthma risk among Puerto Ricans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174(10):1086–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Congress of Eugenics (1923) Scientific papers of the second International Congress of Eugenics: held at American Museum of Natural History, New York, 22–28 September 1921, Committee on Publication, Charles B. Davenport, Chairman. Williams & Williams, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Lee SSJ (2006) Biobanks of a ‘racial kind’: mining for difference in the new genetics. Patterns Prejudice 40(4–5):443–460Google Scholar
- Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Risch N, Burchard E, Ziv E, Tang H (2002) Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease. Genome Biol 3:comment2007.1-2007.12Google Scholar