Human Genetics

, Volume 122, Issue 1, pp 103–111

A twin study of auditory processing indicates that dichotic listening ability is a strongly heritable trait

  • Robert J. Morell
  • Carmen C. Brewer
  • Dongliang Ge
  • Harold Snieder
  • Christopher K. Zalewski
  • Kelly A. King
  • Dennis Drayna
  • Thomas B. Friedman
Original Investigation

Abstract

We administered tests commonly used in the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders (APDs) to twins recruited from the general population. We observed significant correlations in test scores between co-twins. Our analyses of test score correlations among 106 MZ and 33 DZ twin pairs indicate that dichotic listening ability is a highly heritable trait. Dichotic listening is the ability to identify and distinguish different stimuli presented simultaneously to each ear. Deficits in dichotic listening skills indicate a lesion or defect in interhemispheric information processing. Such defects or lesions can be prominent in elderly listeners, language-impaired children, stroke victims, and individuals with PAX6 mutations. Our data indicates that other auditory processing abilities are influenced by shared environment. These findings should help illuminate the etiology of APDs, and help to clarify the relationships between auditory processing abilities and learning/language disorders associated with APDs.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Amos NE, Humes LE (1998) SCAN test–retest reliability for first- and third-grade children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:834–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baechtel FS, Monson KL, Forsen GE, Budowle B, Kearney JJ (1991) Tracking the violent criminal offender through DNA typing profiles—a national database system concept. Exs 58:356–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey PJ, Snowling MJ (2002) Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy. Br Med Bull 63:135–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamiou DE, Musiek FE, Luxon LM (2001) Aetiology and clinical presentations of auditory processing disorders—a review. Arch Dis Child 85:361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamiou DE, Musiek FE, Sisodiya SM, Free SL, Davies RA, Moore A, van Heyningen V, Luxon LM (2004) Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations. Ann Neurol 56:503–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellis TJ (1996) Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting. Singular Publishing Group, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellis TJ, Wilber LA (2001) Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:246–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benasich AA, Tallal P (2002) Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behav Brain Res 136:31–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop DV, Bishop SJ, Bright P, James C, Delaney T, Tallal P (1999) Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:155–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornstein SP, Wilson RH, Cambron NK (1994) Low- and high-pass filtered Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 for monaural and binaural evaluation. J Am Acad Audiol 5:259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cestnick L, Jerger J (2000) Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics. J Am Acad Audiol 11:501–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chermak GD, Musiek FE (1997) Central auditory processing disorders. Singular Publishing Group, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  13. Chermak GD, Somers EK, Seikel JA (1998) Behavioral signs of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol 9:78–84; quiz 85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chermak GD, Hall JW III, Musiek FE (1999) Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol 10:289–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Drayna D, Manichaikul A, de Lange M, Snieder H, Spector T (2001) Genetic correlates of musical pitch recognition in humans. Science 291:1969–1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott LL, Hammer MA (1988) Longitudinal changes in auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. J Speech Hear Disord 53:467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott LL, Hammer MA, Scholl ME (1989) Fine-grained auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. J Speech Hear Res 32:112–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Emanuel DC (2002) The auditory processing battery: survey of common practices. J Am Acad Audiol 13:93–117; quiz 118–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Estourgie-van Burk GF, Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt TC, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Boomsma DI (2006) Body size in five-year-old twins: heritability and comparison to singleton standards. Twin Res Hum Genet 9:646–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foundas AL, Corey DM, Hurley MM, Heilman KM (2004) Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing. Cogn Behav Neurol 17:224–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths TD (2002) Central auditory pathologies. Br Med Bull 63:107–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golding M, Taylor A, Cupples L, Mitchell P (2006) Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Ear Hear 27:129–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon-Salant S (2005) Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:9–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hausler R, Levine RA (2000) Auditory dysfunction in stroke. Acta Otolaryngol 120:689–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hohnen B, Stevenson J (1999) The structure of genetic influences on general cognitive, language, phonological, and reading abilities. Dev Psychol 35:590–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jerger S (1987) Validation of the pediatric speech intelligibility test in children with central nervous system lesions. Audiology 26:298–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jerger J, Musiek F (2000) Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 11:467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerger J, Alford B, Lew H, Rivera V, Chmiel R (1995) Dichotic listening, event-related potentials, and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly. Ear Hear 16:482–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keith RW (1994) SCAN-A: a test for auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  30. Keith RW (1995) Development and standardization of SCAN-A: test of auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. J Am Acad Audiol 6:286–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. King WM, Lombardino LJ, Crandell CC, Leonard CM (2003) Comorbid auditory processing disorder in developmental dyslexia. Ear Hear 24:448–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kujala T, Myllyviita K, Tervaniemi M, Alho K, Kallio J, Naatanen R (2000) Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology 37:262–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H (1995) Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of young Danish twins. Bmj 311:913–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lench N, Stanier P, Williamson R (1988) Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis. Lancet 1:1356–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu RC (2006) Prospective contributions of transgenic mouse models to central auditory research. Brain Res 1091:217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin JS, Jerger JF (2005) Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:25–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moncrieff DW (2006) Identification of binaural integration deficits in children with the Competing Words Subtest: standard score versus interaural asymmetry. Int J Audiol 45:200–7; discussion 207–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moncrieff DW, Musiek FE (2002) Interaural asymmetries revealed by dichotic listening tests in normal and dyslexic children. J Am Acad Audiol 13:428–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore DR (2006) Auditory processing disorder (APD)—Potential contribution of mouse research. Brain Res 1091:200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Musiek FE (1999) Central auditory tests. Scand Audiol Suppl 51:33–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Musiek F, Gollegly K, Lamb L, Lamb P (1990) Slected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction. Semin Hear 11:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neale MC, Cardon L (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  43. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (1999) Mx: statistical modeling. Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  44. Noffsinger D, Wilson RH, Musiek FE (1994) Department of Veterans Affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction. J Am Acad Audiol 5:231–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Noffsinger D, Martinez CD, Andrews M (1996) Dichotic listening to speech: VA-CD data from elderly subjects. J Am Acad Audiol 7:49–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Paul-Brown D, Thompson ME, Catts HW, Chermak GD, Craig CH, Johnston JR, Keith RW, Musiek FE, Robin DA, Sloan C (1996) Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 5:41–53Google Scholar
  47. Schow RL, Seikel JA, Chermak GD, Berent M (2000) Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revisited. Am J Audiol 9:63–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schulte-Korne G, Deimel W, Bartling J, Remschmidt H (1999) The role of phonological awareness, speech perception, and auditory temporal processing for dyslexia. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8(Suppl 3):28–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Springer SP, Searleman A (1978) The ontogeny of hemispheric specialization: evidence from dichotic listening in twins. Neuropsychologia 16:269–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tillery KL, Katz J, Keller WD (2000) Effects of methylphenidate (Ritalin) on auditory performance in children with attention and auditory processing disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 43:893–901PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tregouet DA, Ducimetiere P, Tiret L (1997) Testing association between candidate-gene markers and phenotype in related individuals, by use of estimating equations. Am J Hum Genet 61:189–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vogel F, Motulsky A (1997) Diagnosis of zygosity. Human genetics: problems and approaches, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 761–767Google Scholar
  53. Wilson RH, Preece JP, Salamon DL, Sperry JL, Bornstein SP (1994) Effects of time compression and time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. J Am Acad Audiol 5:269–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright BA, Lombardino LJ, King WM, Puranik CS, Leonard CM, Merzenich MM (1997) Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature 387:176–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Morell
    • 1
  • Carmen C. Brewer
    • 2
  • Dongliang Ge
    • 4
    • 5
  • Harold Snieder
    • 4
    • 6
  • Christopher K. Zalewski
    • 2
  • Kelly A. King
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dennis Drayna
    • 1
  • Thomas B. Friedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Molecular GeneticsNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of HealthRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Otolaryngology BranchNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Hearing and Speech Sciences DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of GeorgiaGeorgia Prevention InstituteAugustaUSA
  5. 5.Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Center for Population Genomics and PharmacogeneticsDurhamUSA
  6. 6.Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations