Human Genetics

, Volume 119, Issue 1–2, pp 226–232 | Cite as

The discovery of the human chromosome number in Lund, 1955–1956

Historical & Personal Perspectives

Abstract

The correct determination of the human diploid chromosome number as 46, by J-H Tjio and A Levan, at the University of Lund, Sweden, occurred 50 years ago, in December 1955; the finding was published in April 1956, ending a period of more than 30 years when the number had been thought to be 48. The background to the discovery and the surrounding factors are reassessed, as are the reasons why previous investigators persistently misidentified the precise number. The necessity for multiple technological advances, the power of previously accepted conclusions in influencing the interpretation of later results, and the importance of other work already undertaken in Lund, are all relevant factors for the occurrence of this discovery, the foundation for modern human cytogenetics, at this particular time and place.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper has its origins in a series of recorded interviews with early workers in human cytogenetics during 2003–2004, and from an invitation by the University and the Mendelian Society of Lund to give their 2004 Nilsson-Ehle lecture. I should like especially to thank all those workers in Lund for their kindness, hospitality and for generously sharing their information and memories, concerning this important period. However, any inaccuracies or misinterpretations are entirely my own responsibility. Special thanks are due to the following Lund workers: Professors Bengt O. Bengtsson, Arne Hagberg (former director of Svalöf Institute), Ulf Kristoffersson, Felix Mitelman, and Drs Eva and Yngve Melander. Outside Sweden I am particularly grateful to Professors David Harnden and Maj Hultén for sharing their memories of this time.

References

  1. Denver Report (1960) A proposed standard system of nomenclature of human mitotic chromosomes. Lancet 1:1063–1065 (The same report appears also in other journals)Google Scholar
  2. Ford CE, Hamerton JL (1956) The chromosomes of man. Nature 178:1010–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ford CE, Jones KW, Polani PE, de Almeida JD, Briggs J-H (1959) A sex-chromosome anomaly in a case of gonadal dysgenesis (Turner’s syndrome). Lancet 1:711–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harper PS (ed) (2004) Landmarks in medical genetics. OUP, New York, pp 68–71Google Scholar
  5. Hsu TC (1952) Mammalian chromosomes in vitro I. The karyotype of man. J Hered 43:167–172Google Scholar
  6. Hsu TC (1979) Human and mammalian cytogenetics. An historical perspective. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsu TC, Pomerat CM (1953) Mammalian chromosomes in vitro II. A method for spreading the chromosomes of cells in tissue culture. J Hered 44:23–29Google Scholar
  8. Hultén M (2002) Numbers, bands and recombination of human chromosomes: historical anecdotes from a Swedish student. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:14–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hultén MA (2003) Nature encyclopedia of the human genome (Tjio J-H), vol 5. MacMillan, London, pp 533–535Google Scholar
  10. Hultén MA, Fredga K (2003) Nature encyclopedia of the human genome (Levan A), vol 3. MacMillan, London, pp 688–689Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs PA, Strong JA (1959) A case of human intersexuality having a possible XXY sex-determining mechanism. Nature 183:302–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kottler M (1974) From 48 to 46: cytological technique, preconception and the counting of human chromosomes. Bull Hist Med 48:465–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lejeune J, Gautier M, Turpin R (1959) Etude des chromosomes somatiques de neuf enfants mongoliens. CR Séances Acad Sci 248:1721–1722Google Scholar
  14. Levan A (1938) The effect of colchicine on root mitoses in Allium. Hereditas 24:471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levan A (1956) Chromosome studies of some human tumors and tissues of normal origin, grown in vivo and in vitro at the Sloan-Kettering Institute. Cancer 9:648–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin A (2004) Can’t any body count? Soc Stud Sci 34:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McManns R (1997) Photographer, pioneer, polyglot NIDDK’s Tjio ends distinguished scientific career. NIH record available at http://www.nih.gov/news/record/02-11-97/story01.htm
  18. Tjio J-H (1978) The chromosome number of man. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:723–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tjio J-H, Levan A (1956) The chromosome number of man. Hereditas 42:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Medical GeneticsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations