Human Genetics

, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 213–220 | Cite as

Mono-nucleotide repeats (MNRs): a neglected polymorphism for generating high density genetic maps in silico

  • Helit Cohen
  • Yael Danin-Poleg
  • Cyril J. Cohen
  • Eli Sprecher
  • Ariel Darvasi
  • Yechezkel KashiEmail author
Original Investigation


Short, tandemly repeated DNA motifs, termed SSRs (simple sequence repeats) are widely distributed throughout eukaryotic genomes and exhibit a high degree of polymorphism. The availability of size-based methods for genotyping SSRs has made them the markers of choice for genetic linkage studies in all higher eukaryotes. These genotyping methods are not efficiently applicable to mononucleotide repeats (MNRs). Consequently, MNRs, although highly frequent in the genome, have generally been ignored as genetic markers. In contrast to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), SSRs can be identified in silico once the genomic sequence or segment of interest is available, without requiring any additional information. This makes possible ad-hoc saturation of a target chromosomal region with informative markers. In this context, MNRs appear to have much to offer by increasing the degree of marker saturation that can be obtained. By using the human genome sequence as a model, computational analysis demonstrates that MNRs in the size of 9–15 bp are highly abundant, with an average appearance every 2.9 kb, exceeding di- and tri-nucleotide SSRs frequencies by two- and five-fold, respectively. In order to enable practical, high throughput MNR genotyping, a rapid method was developed, based on sizing of fluorescent-labeled primer extension products. Genotyping of 16 arbitrarily chosen non-coding MNR sites along human chromosome 22 revealed that almost two-thirds (63%) of them were polymorphic, having 2–5 alleles per locus, with 20% of the polymorphic MNRs having more than two alleles. Thus, MNRs have potential for in silico saturation of sequenced eukaryote genomes with informative genetic markers.


Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Mononucleotide Repeat Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker Polymerase Slippage High Polymorphic Information Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aitman TJ, Hearne CM, McAleer MA, Todd JA (1991) Mononucleotide repeats are an abundant source of length variants in mouse genomic DNA. Mamm Genome 1:206–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin NB (2001) Microsatellite instability. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92:177–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1990) Toward a unified approach to genetic mapping of eukaryotes based on sequence tagged microsatellite sites. Biotechnology (New York) 8:930–932Google Scholar
  4. Beckmann JS, Weber JL (1992) Survey of human and rat microsatellites. Genomics 12:627–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer JC, Yamada NA, Roques CN, Hatch SB, Riess K, Farber RA (2002) Sequence dependent instability of mononucleotide microsatellites in cultured mismatch repair proficient and deficient mammalian cells. Hum Mol Genet 11:707–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20:1004–1010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies K (1993) Of mice and men (and cows and cats). Nature 361:478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellegren H (1993) Abundant (A)n.(T)n mononucleotide repeats in the pig genome: linkage mapping of the porcine APOB, FSA, ALOX12, PEPN and RLN loci. Anim Genet 24:367–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Field D, Wills C (1998) Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellites in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, result from strong mutation pressures and a variety of selective forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1647–1652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray IC, Campbell DA, Spurr NK (2000) Single nucleotide polymorphisms as tools in human genetics. Hum Mol Genet 9:2403–2408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gur-Arie R, Cohen CJ, Eitan Y, Shelef L, Hallerman EM, Kashi Y (2000) Simple sequence repeats in Escherichia coli: abundance, distribution, composition, and polymorphism. Genome Res 10:62–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hauge XY, Litt M (1993) A study of the origin of “shadow bands” seen when typing dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms by the PCR. Hum Mol Genet 2:411–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kashi Y, King D, Soller M (1997) Simple sequence repeats as a source of quantitative genetic variation. Trends Genet 13:74–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Katti MV, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (2001) Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Mol Biol Evol 18:1161–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. King DG, Soller M, Kashi Y (1997) Evolutionary tuning knobs. Endeavour 21:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li J, Butler JM, Tan Y, Lin H, Royer S, Ohler L, Shaler TA, Hunter JM, Pollart DJ, Monforte JA, Becker CH (1999) Single nucleotide polymorphism determination using primer extension and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 20:1258–1265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E (2002) Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol 11:2453–2465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maehara Y, Oda S, Sugimachi K (2001) The instability within: problems in current analyses of microsatellite instability. Mutat Res 461:249–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C (2000) Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res 10:72–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nadir E, Margalit H, Gallily T, Ben Sasson SA (1996) Microsatellite spreading in the human genome: evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6470–6475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nickerson DA, Taylor SL, Weiss KM, Clark AG, Hutchinson RG, Stengard J, Salomaa V, Vartiainen E, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF (1998) DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Nat Genet 19:233–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Smeets HJ, Brunner HG, Ropers HH, Wieringa B (1989) Use of variable simple sequence motifs as genetic markers: application to study of myotonic dystrophy. Hum Genet 83:245–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17:6463–6471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor JG, Choi EH, Foster CB, Chanock SJ (2001) Using genetic variation to study human disease. Trends Mol Med 7:507–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Templeton AR, Clark AG, Weiss KM, Nickerson DA, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF (2000) Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Am J Hum Genet 66:69–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Toth G, Gaspari Z, Jurka J (2000) Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Res 10:967–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Weber JL (1990) Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n.(dG-dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics 7:524–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Webster MT, Smith NG, Ellegren H (2002) Microsatellite evolution inferred from human- chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8748–8753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helit Cohen
    • 1
  • Yael Danin-Poleg
    • 1
  • Cyril J. Cohen
    • 1
  • Eli Sprecher
    • 2
  • Ariel Darvasi
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yechezkel Kashi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology and Food EngineeringTechnion, Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Dermatology and Laboratory of Molecular DermatologyRambam Medical CenterHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Life Science InstituteThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  4. 4.IDgene Pharmaceutical Ltd.JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations