Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping
Ancestry informative markers (AIMs) are genetic loci showing alleles with large frequency differences between populations. AIMs can be used to estimate biogeographical ancestry at the level of the population, subgroup (e.g. cases and controls) and individual. Ancestry estimates at both the subgroup and individual level can be directly instructive regarding the genetics of the phenotypes that differ qualitatively or in frequency between populations. These estimates can provide a compelling foundation for the use of admixture mapping (AM) methods to identify the genes underlying these traits. We present details of a panel of 34 AIMs and demonstrate how such studies can proceed, by using skin pigmentation as a model phenotype. We have genotyped these markers in two population samples with primarily African ancestry, viz. African Americans from Washington D.C. and an African Caribbean sample from Britain, and in a sample of European Americans from Pennsylvania. In the two African population samples, we observed significant correlations between estimates of individual ancestry and skin pigmentation as measured by reflectometry (R2=0.21, P<0.0001 for the African-American sample and R2=0.16, P<0.0001 for the British African-Caribbean sample). These correlations confirm the validity of the ancestry estimates and also indicate the high level of population structure related to admixture, a level that characterizes these populations and that is detectable by using other tests to identify genetic structure. We have also applied two methods of admixture mapping to test for the effects of three candidate genes (TYR, OCA2, MC1R) on pigmentation. We show that TYR and OCA2 have measurable effects on skin pigmentation differences between the west African and west European parental populations. This work indicates that it is possible to estimate the individual ancestry of a person based on DNA analysis with a reasonable number of well-defined genetic markers. The implications and applications of ancestry estimates in biomedical research are discussed.
We thank the volunteers who gave their time and DNA for this research, and Mark Jobling for assistance with sample preparation. We also acknowledge the support of the Penn State University General Clinical Research Center (M01 RR10732). This work was also supported in part by grants from the NIH/NHGRI (HG002154) to M.D.S., from NIH/NIMH (MH60343) to P.M.M., a Howard University New Faculty Award to R.A.K., and by the British Broadcasting Corporation to A.B.
- Bastiaens MT, Huurne JA ter, Kielich C, Gruis NA, Westendorp RG, Vermeer BJ, Bavinck JN, Leiden Skin Cancer Study Team (2001b) Melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants determine the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer independently of fair skin and red hair. Am J Hum Genet 68:884–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byard PJ (1981) Quantitative genetics of human skin color. Yearb Phys Anthrop 24:123–137Google Scholar
- Dean M, Stephens J C, Winkler C, Lomb DA, Ramsburg M, Boaze R, Stewart C, Charbonneau L, Goldman D, Albaugh BJ, Goedert JJ, Beasley RP, Hwang L-Y, Buchbinder S, Weedon M, Johnson P, Eichelberger M, O'Brien SJ (1994) Polymorphic admixture typing in human ethnic populations. Am J Hum Genet 55:788–808PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flanagan N, Healy E, Ray A, Philips S, Todd C, Jackson IJ, Birch-Machin MA, Rees JL (2000) Pleiotropic effects of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene on human pigmentation. Hum Mol Genet 9:2531–2537Google Scholar
- Kennedy C, Huurne J ter, Berkhout M, Gruis N, Bastiaens M, Bergman W, Willemze R, Bavinck JN (2001) Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants are associated with an increased risk for cutaneous melanoma which is largely independent of skin type and hair color. J Invest Dermatol 117:294–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kittles RA, Chen W, Panguluri RK, Ahaghotu C, Jackson A, Adebamowo CA, Griffin R, Williams T, Ukoli F, Adams-Campbell L, Kwagyan J, Isaacs W, Freeman V, Dunston GM (2002) CYP3A4-V and prostate cancer in African Americans: causal or confounding association because of population stratification? Hum Genetics 110:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. In: Dobzhansky TH, Hecht MK, Steere WC (eds) Evolutionary biology, vol 6. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 381–398Google Scholar
- Parra EJ, Kittles RA, Argyropoulos G, Pfaff CL, Hiester K, Bonilla C, Sylvester N, Parrish-Gause D, Garvey WT, Jin L, McKeigue PM, Kamboh MI, Ferrell RE, Pollitzer WS, Shriver MD (2001) Ancestral proportions and admixture dynamics in geographically defined African Americans living in South Carolina. Am J Phys Anthrop 114:18–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robins AH (1991) Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Smith MW, Lauternberger JA, Doo Shine H, Chreetien J, Shrestha S, Gilbert DA, O'Brien SJ (2001) Markers for mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in African-American and Hispanic populations. Am J Hum Genet 69:1080–1094Google Scholar
- Wagner JK, Siccard C, Norton HL, Parra EJ, Shriver MD (2002) Skin responses to ultraviolet light: effects of constitutive pigmentation, sex, and ancestry. Pigment Cell Res (in press)Google Scholar
- Ye J, Parra EJ, Sosnoski D, Hiester K, Underhill P, Shriver MD (2002) Melting curve SNP (McSNP) genotyping: a useful approach to SNP genotyping in forensic science. J Forens Sci 47:593–600Google Scholar