Advertisement

Improved transgenic sexing strains for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using embryo-specific gene promoters

  • Ying Yan
  • Megan E. Williamson
  • Rebecca J. Davis
  • Anne A. Andere
  • Christine J. Picard
  • Maxwell J. ScottEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

For genetic approaches for controlling insect pests such as the sterile insect technique (SIT), it is advantageous to release only males as females are ineffective as control agents and they consume about 50% of the diet. Here we developed tetracycline-repressible Lucilia cuprina transgenic strains in which adult females were fully fertile and viable on a diet that lacked tetracycline and all of their female offspring died at the embryo stage. The transgenic strains are an improvement over the strains we developed previously, which had the disadvantage that adult females on diet without tetracycline were sterile and died prematurely. This was possibly due to the low level expression of the effector gene in ovaries. In the strains developed in this study, the early promoters from L. cuprina nullo or Cochliomyia macellaria CG14427 genes were used to drive the tetracycline transactivator (tTA) expression in the early embryo. In the absence of tetracycline, tTA activates expression of the proapoptotic gene Lshid which contains a female-specific intron. Consequently, only females produce active HID protein and die at the embryo stage. Crossing the tTA-expressing driver lines with an RFPex reporter line confirmed that there was no expression of the effector gene in the ovary. These new embryonic L. cuprina transgenic sexing strains hold great promise for genetic control programs and the system reported here might also be transferable to other major calliphorid livestock pests such as the New World screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax.

Keywords

Sterile insect technique Transgenic Lucilia cuprina Genetic control Cellularization gene 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Amy Berger and Scott Harrison for assistance with fly rearing and Jason Osborne for statistical analysis. The authors acknowledge the use of the Cellular and Molecular Imaging Facility (CMIF) at North Carolina State University, which is supported by the State of North Carolina and the National Science Foundation. The project benefitted from discussions at International Atomic Energy Agency funded meetings for the Coordinated Research Project: “The Use of Molecular Tools to Improve the Effectiveness of SIT”.

Author contributions

Y.Y. did qRT-PCR analysis for cellularization genes, carried out the driver plasmid construction, made the transgenic lines, performed the lethality and longevity tests and drafted the manuscript. M.W. made the tetO-RFPex strain and did the confocal microscopy analysis, performed some of the lethality and longevity testing and carried out the RT-PCR analysis for female embryo lethality testing. R.J.L. isolated RNA and performed qRT-PCR analysis for tTA expression of transgenic lines. A.A.A. and C.J.P. assembled and annotated a draft genome of C. macellaria. M.J.S. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Funding is gratefully acknowledged from specific cooperative agreements (59-6205-3-001 and 58-3094-7-013) between the USDA-ARS and NCSU, a grant (01-15) from the Panama-United States Commission for the Eradication and Prevention of Screwworm (COPEG) (MJS) and National Institute of Justice Grant 2012-DN-BX-K024 (CJP).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

438_2019_1622_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1203 kb)
438_2019_1622_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 26 kb)
438_2019_1622_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (901 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 901 kb)
438_2019_1622_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (60 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 60 kb)
438_2019_1622_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (48 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 48 kb)

References

  1. Allo M, Schor IE, Munoz MJ, de la Mata M, Agirre E, Valcarcel J, Eyras E, Kornblihtt AR (2010) Chromatin and alternative splicing. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anstead CA, Korhonen PK, Young ND, Hall RS, Jex AR, Murali SC, Hughes DS, Lee SF, Perry T, Stroehlein AJ, Ansell BRE, Breugelmans B, Hofmann A, Qu JX, Dugan S, Lee SL, Chao H, Dinh H, Han Y, Doddapaneni HV, Worley KC, Muzny DM, Loannidis P, Waterhouse RM, Zdobnov EM, James PJ, Bagnall NH, Kotze AC, Gibbs RA, Richards S, Batterham P, Gasser RB (2015) Lucilia cuprina genome unlocks parasitic fly biology to underpin future interventions. Nat Commun 6:7344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagnall NH, Kotze AC (2010) Evaluation of reference genes for real-time PCR quantification of gene expression in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Med Vet Entomol 24(2):176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Concha C, Scott MJ (2009) Sexual development in Lucilia cuprina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) is controlled by the transformer gene. Genetics 182:785–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Concha C, Belikoff EJ, Carey BL, Li F, Schiemann AH, Scott MJ (2011) Efficient germ-line transformation of the economically important pest species Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Concha C, Palavesam A, Sagel A, Li F, Osborne JA, Hernandez Y, Pardo T, Quintero G, Vasquez M, Keller GP, Phillips PL, Welch JB, McMillan WO, Skoda SR, Scott MJ (2016) A transgenic male-only strain of the New World screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique. BMC Biol 14:72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crystal MM (1979) Sterilization of screwworm flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) with gamma rays: restudy after two decades. J Med Entomol 15:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis RJ, Belikoff EJ, Scholl EH, Li F, Scott MJ (2018) no blokes is essential for male viability and X chromosome gene expression in the Australian sheep blowfly. Curr Biol 28:1987-1992.e1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franz G (2005) Genetic sexing strains in Mediterranean fruit fly, an example for other species amenable to large-scale rearing for the sterile insect technique. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong P, Epton MJ, Fu G, Scaife S, Hiscox A, Condon KC, Condon GC, Morrison NI, Kelly DW, Dafa’alla T, Coleman PG, Alphey L (2005) A dominant lethal genetic system for autocidal control of the Mediterranean fruitfly. Nat Biotechnol 23(4):453–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gossen M, Bujard H (1992) Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(12):5547–5551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, Duff MO, Landolin JM, Yang L, Artieri CG, van Baren MJ, Boley N, Booth BW, Brown JB, Cherbas L, Davis CA, Dobin A, Li R, Lin W, Malone JH, Mattiuzzo NR, Miller D, Sturgill D, Tuch BB, Zaleski C, Zhang D, Blanchette M, Dudoit S, Eads B, Green RE, Hammonds A, Jiang L, Kapranov P, Langton L, Perrimon N, Sandler JE, Wan KH, Willingham A, Zhang Y, Zou Y, Andrews J, Bickel PJ, Brenner SE, Brent MR, Cherbas P, Gingeras TR, Hoskins RA, Kaufman TC, Oliver B, Celniker SE (2011) The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471(7339):473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Handler AM, Atkinson PW (2006) Insect transgenesis: mechanisms, applications, and ecological safety. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 23:129–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn C, Wimmer EA (2003) A transgene-based, embryo-specific lethality system for insect pest management. Nat Biotechnol 21(1):64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knipling EF (1955) Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J Econ Entomol 48:459–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knipling EF (1959) Sterile-male method of population control. Science 130:902–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li F, Vensko SPI, Belikoff EJ, Scott MJ (2013) Conservation and sex-specific splicing of the transformer gene in the calliphorids Cochliomyia hominivorax, Cochliomyia macellaria and Lucilia sericata. PLoS One 8:e56303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li F, Wantuch HA, Linger RJ, Belikoff EJ, Scott MJ (2014) Transgenic sexing system for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 51:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linger RJ, Belikoff EJ, Scott MJ (2015) Dosage compensation of X-linked muller element F genes but not X-linked transgenes in the Australian sheep blowfly. Plos One 10(10):e0141544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazumdar A, Mazumdar M (2002) How one becomes many: blastoderm cellularization in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 24(11):1012–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moullan N, Mouchiroud L, Wang X, Ryu D, Williams EG, Mottis A, Jovaisaite V, Frochaux MV, Quiros PM, Deplancke B, Houtkooper RH, Auwerx J (2015) Tetracyclines disturb mitochondrial function across eukaryotic models: a call for caution in biomedical research. Cell Rep 10(10):1681–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogaugwu CE, Schetelig MF, Wimmer EA (2013) Transgenic sexing system for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on female-specific embryonic lethality. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 43:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Papathanos PA, Bossin HC, Benedict MQ, Catteruccia F, Malcolm CA, Alphey L, Crisanti A (2009) Sex separation strategies: past experience and new approaches. Malaria J 8(Suppl 2):S5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rendon P, McInnis D, Lance D, Stewart J (2004) Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol 97(5):1547–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandeman RM, Levot GW, Heath AC, James PJ, Greeff JC, Scott MJ, Batterham P, Bowles VM (2014) Control of the sheep blowfly in Australia and New Zealand—are we there yet? Int J Parasitol 44:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schetelig MF, Handler AM (2012a) A transgenic embryonic sexing system for Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 42:790–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schetelig MF, Handler AM (2012b) Strategy for enhanced transgenic strain development for embryonic conditional lethality in Anastrepha suspensa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(24):9348–9353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schetelig MF, Caceres C, Zacharopoulou A, Franz G, Wimmer EA (2009) Conditional embryonic lethality to improve the sterile insect technique in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Biol 7:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schetelig MF, Targovska A, Meza JS, Bourtzis K, Handler AM (2016) Tetracycline-suppressible female lethality and sterility in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. Insect Mol Biol 25:500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott MJ, Concha C, Welch JB, Phillips PL, Skoda SR (2017) Research advances in the screwworm eradication program over the past 25 years. Entomol Exp Appl 164:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yan Y, Scott MJ (2015) A transgenic embryonic sexing system for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Sci Rep 5:16090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan Y, Linger RJ, Scott MJ (2017) Building early-larval sexing systems for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using two constitutive promoters. Sci Rep 7:2538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyIndiana University Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Fraunhofer IME-BRGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations