Advertisement

Genome-wide association study of inflorescence length of cultivated soybean based on the high-throughout single-nucleotide markers

  • Jinyang Wang
  • Xue Zhao
  • Wei Wang
  • Yingfan Qu
  • Weili Teng
  • Lijuan Qiu
  • Hongkun Zheng
  • Yingpeng HanEmail author
  • Wenbin LiEmail author
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

As an important and complex trait, inflorescence length (IL) of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] significantly affected seed yields. Therefore, elucidating molecular basis of inflorescence architecture, especially for IL, was important for improving soybean yield potentials. Longer IL meaned to have more pod and seed in soybean. Hence, increasing IL and improving yield are targets for soybean breeding. In this study, a association panel, comprising 283 diverse samples, was used to dissect the genetic basis of IL based on genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) and haplotype analysis. GWAS and haplotype analysis were conducted through high-throughout single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) developed by SLAF-seq methodology. A total of 39, 057 SNPs (minor allele frequency ≥ 0.2 and missing data ≤ 10%) were utilized to evaluate linkage disequilibrium (LD) level in the tested association panel. A total of 30 association signals were identified to be associated with IL via GWAS. Among them, 13 SNPs were novel, and another 17 SNPs were overlapped or located near the linked regions of known quantitative trait nucleotide (QTN) with soybean seed yield or yield component. The functional genes, located in the 200-kb genomic region of each peak SNP, were considered as candidate genes, such as the cell division/ elongation, specific enzymes, and signaling or transport of specific proteins. These genes have been reported to participant in the regulation of IL. Ten typical long-IL lines and ten typical short-IL lines were re-sequencing, and then, six SNPs from five genes were obtained based on candidate gene-based association. In addition, 42 haplotypes were defined based on haplotype analysis. Of them, 11 haplotypes were found to regulate long IL (> 14 mm) in soybean. The identified 30 QTN with beneficial alleles and their candidate genes might be valuable for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of IL and further improving the yield potential of soybean.

Keywords

Genome-wide association analysis Inflorescence length Single-nucleotide polymorphism Candidate genes 

Notes

Funding

This study was financially supported by National Key R & D Project for Crop Breeding (2016YFD0100304), the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (31671717 and 31471517), the National Supporting Project (2014BAD22B01), the Youth Leading Talent Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology in China (2015RA228), The National Ten-thousand Talents Program, Heilongjiang Provincial Project (GX17B002, JC2018007, and C2018016), Postdoctoral Fund in Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Z15017 and LBH-Q17015), The ‘Youth Innovation Talent’ Project of the general undergraduate universities in Heilongjiang province (UNPYSCT-2016145), and the ‘Academic Backbone’ Project of Northeast Agricultural University (17XG22).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

438_2019_1533_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (31 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 31 KB)
438_2019_1533_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 18 KB)
438_2019_1533_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 9 KB)

References

  1. .Zhao L, Kunst L (2016) SUPERKILLER complex components are required for the RNA exosome-mediated control of cuticular wax biosynthesis in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems. Plant Physiol 171:960–973Google Scholar
  2. Benlloch R, Berbel A, Ali L, Gohari G, Millán T, Madueño F (2015) Genetic control of inflorescence architecture in legumes. Front Plant Sci 6:543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blazquez MA, Ferrandiz C, Madueno F, Parcy F (2006) How floral meristems are built. Plant Mol Biol 60:855–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Phys 54:519–546Google Scholar
  5. Bomblies K, Wang RL, Ambrose BA, Schmidt RJ, Meeley RB, Doebley J (2003) Duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs zfl1 and zfl2 control inflorescence architecture and flower patterning in maize. Development 130:2385–2395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E (1997) Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275(5296):80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner WG, Leuendorf JE, Cortleven A, Martin LB, Schaller H, Schmülling T (2017) Analysis of CFB, a cytokinin-responsive gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encoding a novel F-box protein regulating sterol biosynthesis. J Exp Bot 68:2769–2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao Y, Li S, Wang Z, Chang F, Kong J, Gai J, Zhao T (2017) Identification of major quantitative trait loci for seed oil content in soybeans by combining linkage and genome-wide association mapping. Front Plant Sci 8:1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrie C, Giraud E, Duncan O, Xu L, Wang Y, Huang S, Vrielink A (2010) Conserved and novel functions for Arabidopsis MIA40 in assembly of proteins in mitochondria and peroxisomes. J Biol Chem 285:36138–36148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng R, Lim JE, Samocha KE, Sokoloff G, Abney M, Skol AD, Palmer AA (2010) Genome-wide association studies and the problem of relatedness among advanced intercross lines and other highly recombinant populations. Genetics 185:1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Contreras-Soto RI, Mora F, Lazzari F, de Oliveira MAR, Scapim CA, Schuster I (2017) Genome-wide association mapping for flowering and maturity in tropical soybean: implications for breeding strategies. Breed Sci 67:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delis C, Krokida A, Georgiou S, Peña-Rodríguez LM, Kavroulakis N, Ioannou E, Papadopoulou KK (2011) Role of lupeol synthase in Lotus japonicus nodule formation. New Phytol 189:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas SJ, Chuck G, Dengler RE, Pelecanda L, Riggs CD (2002) KNAT1 and ERECTA regulate inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Du W, Wang M, Fu S, Yu D (2009) Mapping QTLs for seed yield and drought susceptibility index in soybean (Glycine max L.) across different environments. J Genet Genom 36:721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dubots E, Audry M, Yamaryo Y, Bastien O, Ohta H, Breton C, Block MA (2010) Activation of the chloroplast monogalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase MGD1 by phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylglycerol. J Biol Chem 285:6003–6011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao F, Wang K, Liu Y, Chen Y, Chen P, Shi Z, Li S (2016) Blocking miR396 increases rice yield by shaping inflorescence architecture. Nat Plants 2:15196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guzman PS, Diers BW, Neece DJ, St Martin SK, LeRoy AR, Grau CR, Nelson RL (2007) QTL associated with yield in three backcross-derived populations of soybean. Crop Sci 47:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han Y, Li D, Zhu D, Li H, Li X, Teng W, Li W (2012) QTL analysis of soybean seed weight across multi-genetic backgrounds and environments. Theor Appl Genet 125:671–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han Y, Zhao X, Cao G, Wang Y, Li Y, Liu D, Zheng H (2015) Genetic characteristics of soybean resistance to HG type 0 and HG type 1.2.3.5.7 of the cyst nematode analyzed by genome-wide association mapping. BMC Genom 16:598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang F, Zago MK, Abas L, van Marion A, Ampudia CSG, Offringa R (2010) Phosphorylation of conserved PIN motifs directs Arabidopsis PIN1 polarity and auxin transport. Plant Cell 22:1129–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang EY, Song Q, Jia G, Specht JE, Hyten DL, Costa J, Cregan PB (2014) A genome-wide association study of seed protein and oil content in soybean. BMC Genom 15:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hyten DL, Pantalone VR, Sams CE, Saxton AM, Landau-Ellis D, Stefaniak TR, Schmidt ME (2004) Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theor Appl Genet 109:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingram GC, Doyle S, Carpenter R, Schultz EA, Simon R, Coen ES (1997) Dual role for fimbriata in regulating floral homeotic genes and cell division in Antirrhinum. EMBO J 16:6521–6534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang Y, Wu C, Zhang L, Hu P, Hou W, Zu W, Han T (2011) Long-day effects on the terminal inflorescence development of a photoperiod-sensitive soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) variety. Plant Sci 180:504–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jun TH, Freewalt K, Michel AP, Mian R (2014) Identification of novel QTL for leaf traits in soybean. Plant Breed 133:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jung CJ, Hur YY, Jung SM, Noh JH, Do GR, Park SJ, Lee HJ (2014) Transcriptional changes of gibberellin oxidase genes in grapevines with or without gibberellin application during inflorescence development. J Plant Res 127:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kan G, Zhang W, Yang W, Ma D, Zhang D, Hao D, Yu D (2015) Association mapping of soybean seed germination under salt stress. Mol Genet Genom 290:2147–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kawamura K, Hibrand-Saint Oyant L, Crespel L, Thouroude T, Lalanne D, Foucher F (2011) Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and inflorescence architecture in rose. Theor Appl Genet 122:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilen TC (1989) Inheritance of a long terminal raceme in soybean. Crop Sci 29:966–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kulkarni KP, Asekova S, Lee DH, Bilyeu K, Song JT, Lee JD (2017) Mapping QTLs for 100-seed weight in an interspecific soybean cross of Williams 82 (Glycine max) and PI 366121 (Glycine soja). Crop Pasture Sci 68:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kyozuka J, Konishi S, Nemoto K, Izawa T, Shimamoto K (1998) Down-regulation of RFL, the FLO/LFY homolog of rice, accompanied with panicle branch initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1979–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li W, Zheng DH, Van K, Lee SH (2008) QTL mapping for major agronomic traits across two years in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). J Crop Sci Biotechnol l11:171–190Google Scholar
  34. Li S, Qian Q, Fu Z, Zeng D, Meng X, Kyozuka J, Wang Y (2009) Short panicle1 encodes a putative PTR family transporter and determines rice panicle size. Plant J 58:592–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li YH, Reif JC, Ma YS, Hong HL, Liu ZX, Chang RZ, Qiu LJ (2015) Targeted association mapping demonstrating the complex molecular genetics of fatty acid formation in soybean. BMC Genom 16:841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liljegren SJ, Gustafson-Brown C, Pinyopich A, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF (1999) Interactions among APETALA1, LEAFY, and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate. Plant Cell 11:1007–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin D, Xiang Y, Xian Z, Li Z (2016) Ectopic expression of SlAGO7 alters leaf pattern and inflorescence architecture and increases fruit yield in tomato. Physiol Plant 157:490–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q, Peiffer J, Li M, Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z (2012) GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28:2397–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mansur LM, Orf JH, Chase K, Jarvik T, Cregan PB, Lark KG (1996) Genetic mapping of agronomic traits using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Crop Sci 36:1327–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mao T, Li J, Wen Z, Wu T, Wu C, Sun S, Wang D (2017) Association mapping of loci controlling genetic and environmental interaction of soybean flowering time under various photo-thermal conditions. BMC Genom 18:415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moongkanna J, Nakasathien S, Novitzky WP, Kwanyuen P, Sinchaisri P, Srinives P (2011) SSR markers linking to seed traits and total oil content in soybean. Thai J Agric Sci 44:233–241Google Scholar
  42. Panthee DR, Pantalone VR, West DR, Saxton AM, Sams CE (2005) Quantitative trait loci for seed protein and oil concentration, and seed size in soybean. Crop Sci 45:2015–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossi ME, Orf JH, Liu LJ, Dong Z, Rajcan I (2013) Genetic basis of soybean adaptation to North American vs. Asian mega-environments in two independent populations from Canadian × Chinese crosses. Theor Appl Genet 126:1809–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salas P, Oyarzo-Llaipen JC, Wang D, Chase K, Mansur L (2006) Genetic mapping of seed shape in three populations of recombinant inbred lines of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet 113:1459–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schaik PHV, Probst AH (1958) The inheritance of inflorescence type, peduncle length, flowers per node, and percent flower shedding in soybeans 1. Agron J 50:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR (1993) Genetic interactions that regulate inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5:639–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smakowska-Luzan E, Mott GA, Parys K, Stegmann M, Howton TC, Layeghifard M, Weinberger N (2018) An extracellular network of Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases. Nature 553:342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Souer E, Van DKA, Kloos D, Spelt C, Bliek M, Mol J, Koes R (1998) Genetic control of branching pattern and floral identity during Petunia inflorescence development. Development 125:733–742Google Scholar
  49. Sun X, Liu D, Zhang X, Li W, Liu H, Hong W, Xu C (2013) SLAF-seq: an efficient method of large-scale de novo SNP discovery and genotyping using high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8:e58700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tao LZ, Cheung AY, Wu HM (2002) Plant Rac-like GTPases are activated by auxin and mediate auxin-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 14:2745–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang D, Du XL, Hu JG, Zhang HS, Yang JS, Zhai HQ (2003) Cloning and expression of maize fructose-6-phosphate, 2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase (mF2KP). J Genet Genom 30:163–168Google Scholar
  52. Wang J, Wan X, Crossa J, Crouch J, Weng J, Zhai H, Wan J (2006) QTL mapping of grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using chromosome segment substitution lines. Genet Res 88:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang X, Li Y, Zhang H, Sun G, Zhang W, Qiu LJ (2015) Evolution and association analysis of GmCYP78A10 gene with seed size/weight and pod number in soybean. Mol Biol Rep 42:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu X, Li Y, Shi Y, Song Y, Zhang D, Li C, Wang T (2016) Joint-linkage mapping and GWAS reveal extensive genetic loci that regulate male inflorescence size in maize. Plant Biotechnol J 14:1551–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamburenko MV, Kieber JJ, Schaller GE (2017) Dynamic patterns of expression for genes regulating cytokinin metabolism and signaling during rice inflorescence development. PLoS One 12:e0176060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan L, Hofmann N, Li S, Ferreira ME, Song B, Jiang G, Song Q (2017) Identification of QTL with large effect on seed weight in a selective population of soybean with genome-wide association and fixation index analyses. BMC Genom 18:529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang K, Moon JK, Jeong N, Chun HK, Kang ST, Back K, Jeong SC (2011) Novel major quantitative trait loci regulating the content of isoflavone in soybean seeds. Genes Genom 33:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuan J, Njiti VN, Meksem K, Iqbal MJ, Triwitayakorn K, Kassem MA, Lightfoot DA (2002) Quantitative trait loci in two soybean recombinant inbred line populations segregating for yield and disease resistance. Crop Sci 42:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yue K, Sandal P, Williams EL, Murphy E, Stes E, Nikonorova N, Lin Z (2016) PP2A-3 interacts with ACR4 and regulates formative cell division in the Arabidopsis root. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:1447–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zeng A, Chen P, Korth K, Hancock F, Pereira A, Brye K, Shi A (2017) Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of salt tolerance in worldwide soybean germplasm lines. Mol Breed 37:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang YM, Huang F, Yu DY, Gai JY (2003) Mapping the trait controlled by two duplicate genes in the DH or RIL population. Hereditas 25:57–59Google Scholar
  62. Zhang H, Li C, Davis EL, Wang J, Griffin JD, Kofsky J, Song BH (2016a) Genome-wide association study of resistance to soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) HG Type 2.5.7 in wild soybean (Glycine soja). Front Plant Sci 7:1214Google Scholar
  63. Zhang J, Song Q, Cregan PB, Jiang GL (2016b) Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycine max). Theor Appl Genet 129:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao X, Han Y, Li Y, Liu D, Sun M, Zhao Y, Teng W (2015) Loci and candidate gene identification for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) via association and linkage maps. Plant J 82:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhao X, Teng W, Li Y, Liu D, Cao G, Li D, Li W (2017) Loci and candidate genes conferring resistance to soybean cyst nematode HG type 2.5.7. BMC Genom 18:462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou F, Guo Y, Qiu LJ (2016) Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase genes in soybean. BMC Plant Biol 16:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zourelidou M, Absmanner B, Weller B, Barbosa IC, Willige BC, Fastner A, Hirt H (2014) Auxin efflux by PIN-FORMED proteins is activated by two different protein kinases, D6 PROTEIN KINASE and PINOID. Elife 3:e02860CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Ministry of Education (Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology and Breeding/Genetics of Chinese Agriculture Ministry)Northeast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Institute of Crop ScienceNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Bioinformatics DivisionBiomarker Technologies CorporationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations