Advertisement

H3K4/K9 acetylation and Lr28-mediated expression of six leaf rust responsive genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

  • Chanchal Sharma
  • Santosh Kumar
  • Gautam Saripalli
  • Neelu Jain
  • Saurabh Raghuvanshi
  • J. B. Sharma
  • K. V. Prabhu
  • P. K. Sharma
  • H. S. Balyan
  • P. K. Gupta
Original Article

Abstract

Development of leaf rust-resistant cultivars is a priority during wheat breeding, since leaf rust causes major losses in yield. Resistance against leaf rust due to Lr genes is partly controlled by epigenetic modifications including histone acetylation that is known to respond to biotic/abiotic stresses. In the present study, enrichment of H3K4ac and H3K9ac in promoters of six defense responsive genes (N-acetyltransferase, WRKY 40, WRKY 70, ASR1, Peroxidase 12 and Sarcosine oxidase) was compared with their expression in a pair of near-isogenic lines (NILs) for the gene Lr28 following inoculation with leaf rust pathotype ’77-5’; ChIP-qPCR was used for this purpose. The proximal and distal promoters of these genes contained a number of motifs that are known to respond to biotic stresses. The enrichment of two acetylation marks changed with passage of time; changes in expression of two of the six genes (N-acetyltransferase and peroxidase12), largely matched with changes in H3K4/H3K9 acetylation patterns of the two promoter regions. For example, enrichment of both the marks matched with higher expression of N-acetyltransferase gene in susceptible NIL and the deacetylation (H3K4ac) largely matched with reduced gene expression in resistant NIL. In peroxidase12, enrichment of H3K4ac and H3K9ac largely matched with higher expression in both the NILs. In the remaining four genes, changes in H3 acetylation did not always match with gene expression levels. This indicated complexity in the regulation of the expression of these remaining four genes, which may be controlled by other epigenetic/genetic regulatory mechanisms that need further analysis.

Keywords

Bread wheat Leaf rust resistance Epigenetics Histone modifications Acetylation Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance from the Department of Biotechnology (Grant number BT/PR3337/AGR/2/819/2011), Government of India for carrying out this study is gratefully acknowledged. CS, SK and GS were each awarded JRF/SRF by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. PKG and HSB were each awarded the position of Senior Scientist by Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi. PKG was also awarded a National Academy of Sciences India (NASI) Senior Scientist Platinum Jubilee Fellowship during the tenure of this research work.

Author contributions

PKG and HSB conceived the experiment. CS conducted most of the experiments including ChIP-qPCR with the help of SK, who provided regular timely suggestions during the course of experimental work. SK also helped CS in preparation of first draft of the manuscript, which was edited and finalized by PKG, HSB and PKS with the help of GS, SK, CS and SR. NJ and KVP raised and provided the plant material.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

438_2018_1500_MOESM1_ESM.doc (78 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 78 KB)
438_2018_1500_MOESM2_ESM.doc (62 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 62 KB)

References

  1. Ahmed P, Rasool S, Gul A, Sheikh SA, Akram NA, Ashraf M, Kazi AM, Gucel S (2016) Jasmonates: multifunctional roles in stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci: 813Google Scholar
  2. Ayyappan V, Kalavacharla V, Thimmapuram J, Bhide KP, Sripathi VR, Smolinski TG, Manoharan M, Thurston Y, Todd A, Kingham B (2015) Genome-wide profiling of histone modifications (H3K9me2 and H4K12ac) and gene expression in rust (Uromyces appendiculatus) inoculated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PLoS ONE 10:e0132176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, Zhou DX (2006) Arabidopsis GCN5, HD1, and TAF1/HAF2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 18:2893–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilichak A, Ilnystkyy Y, Hollunder J, Kovalchuk I (2012) The progeny of Arabidopsis thaliana plants exposed to salt exhibit changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications and gene expression. PLoS ONE 7:e30515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bindschedler LV, Dewdney J, Blee KA, Stone JM, Asai T, Plotnikov J, Denoux C, Hayes T, Gerrish C, Davies DR, Ausubel FM, Bolwell GP (2006) Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance. The Plant J 47:851–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusslan JA, Bonora G, Rus-Canterbury A, Tariq F, Jaroszewicz A, Pellegrini M (2015) A genome-wide chronological study of gene expression and two histone modifications, H3k4me3 and H3k9ac, during developmental leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 168:1246–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra S, Singh D, Pathak J, Kumari S, Kumar M, Poddar R, Balyan HS, Gupta PK, Prabhu KV, Mukhopadhyay K (2016) De novo assembled wheat transcriptomes delineate differentially expressed host genes in response to leaf rust infection. PLoS ONE 11:e0148453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen NZ, Zhang XQ, Wei PC, Chen QJ, Ren F, Chen J, Wang XC (2007) AtHAP3b plays a crucial role in the regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis during osmotic stress. J Biochem Mol Bio 40:1083–1089Google Scholar
  9. Chen LT, Luo M, Wang YY, Wu K (2010) Involvement of Arabidopsis histone deacetylase HDA6 in ABA and salt stress response. J Exp Bot 61:3345–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen L, Song Y, Li S, Zhang L, Zou C, Yu D (2012) The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim Biophy Acta 1819:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhariwal R, Vyas S, Govindraj RB, Jha SK, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Prabhu KV, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2011) Analysis of differentially expressed genes in leaf rust infected bread wheat involving seedling resistance gene Lr28. Funct Plant Biol 38:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding B, Wang GL (2015) Chromatin versus pathogens: the function of epigenetics in plant immunity. Front Plant Sci 6:675PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dmochowska-Boguta M, Nadolska-Orczyk A, Orczyk W (2013) Roles of peroxidases and NADPH oxidases in the oxidative response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to brown rust (Puccinia triticina) infection. Plant Pathol 62:993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dmochowska-Boguta M, Alaba S, Yanushevska Y, Piechota U, Lasota E, Nadolska-Orezyk A (2015) Pathogen-regulated genes in wheat isogenic lines differing in resistance to brown rust Puccinia triticina. BMC Genom 16:742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dominguez PG, Carrari F (2015) ASR1 transcription factor and its role in metabolism. Plant Signal Behav 10:e992751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erayman M, Turktas M, Akdogan G et al.(2015) Transcriptome analysis of wheat inoculated with Fusarium graminearum. Front Plant Sci 6:867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan J, Krautkramer KA, Feldman JL, Denu JM (2015) Metabolic regulation of histone post-translational modifications. ACS Chem Biol 10(1):95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang H, Liu X, Thorn G, Duan J, Tian L (2014) Expression analysis of histone acetyltransferases in rice under drought stress. Biochem Bioph Res Comm 443:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng H, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Wang X, Liu J, Li M, Huang L, Kang Z (2013) Target of tae-miR408, a chemocyanin-like protein gene (TaCLP1), plays positive roles in wheat response to high-salinity, heavy cupric stress and stripe rust. Plant Mol Biol 83:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu SJ, Wang H, Feng LN, Sun Y, Yang WX, Liu DK (2009) Analysis of methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism in wheat genome under the wheat leaf rust stress. Hereditas (Beijing) 31:297–304Google Scholar
  21. Gendrel A-V, Lippman Z, Martienssen R, Colot V (2005) Profiling histone modification patterns in plants using genomic tiling microarrays. Nat Methods 2:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golan I, Guadalupe Dominguez P, Konrad Z, Shkolnik-Inbar D, Carrari F, Bar-Zvi D (2014) Tomato abscisic acid stress ripening (ASR) gene family revisited. PLoS ONE 9:e107117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomez-Diaz E, Jorda M, Peinado MA, Rivero A (2012) Epigenetics of host–pathogen interactions: the road ahead and the road behind. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goyer A, Johnson TL, Olsen LJ, Collakova E, Shachar-Hill Y, Rhodes D, Hanson AD (2004) Characterization and metabolic function of a peroxisomal sarcosine and pipecolate oxidase from Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 279:16947–16953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guillemette B, Drogaris P, Lin H-HS, Armstrong H, Hiragami-Hamada K, Imhof A, Bonneil E, Thibault P, Verreault A, Festenstein RJ (2011) H3 lysine 4 is acetylated at active gene promoters and is regulated by H3 lysine 4 methylation. PLoS Genet 7:e1001354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. He X, Qu B, Li W, Zhao X, Teng W, Ma W, Ren Y, Li B, Li Z, Tong Y (2015) The nitrate inducible NAC transcription factor TaNAC2-5A controls nitrate responses and increases wheat yield. Plant Phys 169:1991–2005Google Scholar
  27. Hu L, Liang W, Yin C, Cui X, Zong J, Wang X, Hu J, Zhang D (2011) Rice MADS3 regulates ROS homeostasis during late anther development. Plant Cell 23:515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu W, Huang C, Deng X, Zhou S, Chen L, Li Y, Wang C, Ma Z, Yuan Q, Wang Y, Cai R, Liang X, Yang G, He G (2013a) TaASR1, a transcription factor gene in wheat, confers drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Environ 36:1449–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu Z, Han Z, Song N, Chai L, Yao Y, Peng H, Ni Z, Sun Q (2013b) Epigenetic modification contributes to the expression divergence of three TaEXPA1 homeologs in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol 197:1344–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huerta-Espino J, Singh RP, German S, McCallum BD, Park RF, Chen WQ (2011) Global status of wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina. Euphytica 179:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Imhof A, Wolffe AP (1998) Transcription: gene control by targeted histone acetylation. Curr Biol 8:R422–R424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaskiewicz M, Peterhansel C, Conrath U (2011) Detection of histone modifications in plant leaves. J Vis Exp 55:e3096Google Scholar
  33. Jeon J, Kwon S, Lee Y-H (2014) Histone acetylation in fungal pathogens of plants. Plant Path J 30:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang CH, Huang ZY, Xie P, Gu C, Li K, Wang DC, Yu YY, Fan ZH, Wang CJ, Wang YP, Guo YH, Guo JH (2016) Transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY11 served as regulators in rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156-induced systemic resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 67:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joo J, Lee YH, Kim YK, Nahm BH, Song S (2013) Abiotic stress responsive rice ASR1 and ASR3 exhibit different tissue-dependent sugar and hormone-sensitivities. Mol Cells 35(5):421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knoth C, Ringler J, Dangl JL, Eulgem T (2007) Arabidopsis WRKY70 is required for full RPP4-mediated disease resistance and basal defense against Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumar D, Singh D, Singh AK, Kumar M, Prabhu KV, Mukhopadhyay K (2014) Functional characterisation of a WRKY transcription factor of wheat and its expression analysis during leaf rust pathogenesis. Funct Plant Biol 41:1295–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar V, Singh B, Singh SK, Rai KM, Singh SP, Sable A, Pant P, Saxena G, Sawant SV (2018) Role of GhHDA5 in H3K9 deacetylation and fiber initiation in Gossypium hirsutum. Plant J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lang-Mladek C, Popova O, Kiok K, Berlinger M, Rakic B, Aufsatz W, Jonak C, Hauser M-T, Luschnig C (2010) Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 3:594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Latrasse D, Jégu T, Li H, de Zelicourt A, Raynaud C, Legras S, Gust A, Samajova O, Veluchamy A, Rayapuram N, Ramirez-Prado JS, Kulikova O, Colcombet J, Bigeard J, Genot B, Bisseling T, Benhamed M, Hirt H (2017) MAPK-triggered chromatin reprogramming by histone deacetylase in plant innate immunity. Genome Biol 18:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouzé P, Rombauts S (2002) PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li J, Brader G, Palva TE (2004) The WRKY70 transcription factor: a node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense. Plant Cell 16:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li J, Brader G, Kariola T, Palva ET (2006) WRKY70 modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense. Plant J 46(3):477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li C, Wu K, Fu G, Li Y, Zhong Y, Lin Y, Zhou Y, Tian L, Huang S (2009) Regulation of oleosin expression in developing peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) embryos through nucleosome loss and histone modifications. J Exp Bot 60:4371–4382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li J, Besseau S, Toronen P, Sipari N, Kollist H, Holm L, Palva ET (2013) Defense-related transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY54 modulate osmotic stress tolerance by regulating stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 202:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li H, Yan S, Zhao L, Tan J, Zhang Q, Gao F, Wang P, Hou H, Li L (2014) Histone acetylation associated up-regulation of the cell wall related genes is involved in salt stress induced maize root swelling. BMC Plant Biol 14:105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li X, Jiang Y, Ji Z, Liu Y, Zhang Q (2015) BRHIS1 suppresses rice innate immunity through binding to monoubiquitinated H2A and H2B variants. EMBO Rep 16:1192–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lin X, Tirichine L, Bowler C (2012) Protocol: chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) methodology to investigate histone modifications in two model diatom species. Plant Methods 2012;8:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu HY, Dai JR, Feng DR, Liu B, Wang HB, Wang JF (2010) Characterization of a novel plantain Asr gene, MpAsr, that is regulated in response to infection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense and abiotic stresses. J Integ Plant Biol 52:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆C T method. Method 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luna E, Bruce TJA, Roberts MR, Flors V, Ton J (2012) Next generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 158:844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McIntosh RA, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Morris C, Xia XC (2017) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat: 2017 supplement. https://shigen.nig.ac.jp/wheat/komugi/genes/macgene/supplement2017.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
  53. Metsalu T, Vilo J (2015) ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W566–W570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Offermann S, Dreesen B, Horst I, Danker T, Jaskiewicz M, Peterhansel C (2008) Developmental and environmental signals induce distinct histone acetylation profiles on distal and proximal promoter elements of the C4-Pepc gene in maize. Genetics 179:1891–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pan L, Liu X, Wang Z (2012) Comparative DNA methylation analysis of powdery mildew susceptible and resistant near-isogenic lines in common wheat. Life Sci J 10:2073–2083Google Scholar
  56. Ramu VS, Paramanantham A, Ramegowda V, Raju BM, Udayakumar M, Kumar MS (2016) Transcriptome analysis of sunflower genotypes with contrasting oxidative stress tolerance reveals individual and combined biotic and abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms. PLoS ONE 11:e0157522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ren C-M, Zhu Q, Gao BD, Ke SY, Yu WC, Xie DX, Peng W (2008) Transcription factor WRKY70 displays important but no indispensable roles in jasmonate and salicylic acid signaling. J Integr Plant Biol 50:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roy D, Paul A, Roy A, Ghosh R, Ganguly P, Chaudhuri S (2014) Differential acetylation of histone H3 at the regulatory region of OsDREB1b facilitates chromatin remodeling and transcription activation during cold stress. PLoS ONE 9:e100343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sandalio LM, Romero-Puertas MC (2015) Peroxisomes sense and respond to environmental cues by regulating ROS and RNS signalling networks. Ann Bot 116:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sandalio LM, Rodrıguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, del Río LA (2013) Role of peroxisomes as a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling molecules. Subcell Biochem 69:231–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Satapathy L, Singh D, Kumar D, Kumar M, Prabhu KV, Mukhopadhyay K (2014) Transcriptome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in wheat and their leaf rust responsive expression profiling. Mol Genet Genom 289:1289–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Servet C, Benhamed M, Latrasse D, Kim W, Delarue M, Zhou DX (2008) Characterization of a phosphatase 2C protein as an interacting partner of the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 in Arabidopsis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1779:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Servet C, eSilva NC, Zhou DX (2010) Histone acetyltransferase AtGCN5/HAG1 is a versatile regulator of developmental and inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 3:670–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma C, Saripalli G, Kumar S, Gautam T, Kumar A, Rani S, Jain N, Prasad P, Raghuvanshi S, Jain M, Sharma JB, Prabhu KV, Sharma PK, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2018) A study of transcriptome in leaf rust infected bread wheat involving seedling resistance gene Lr28. Funct Plant Biol 45:1046–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh D, Kumar D, Satapathy L, Pathak J, Chandra S, Riaz A, Bhaganangre G, Dhariwal R, Kumar M, Prabhu KV, Balyan HS, Gupta PK, Mukhopadhyay K (2017) Insights of Lr28 mediated wheat leaf rust resistance: transcriptomic approach. Gene 637:72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Song H-R, Noh Y-S (2012) Rhythmic oscillation of histone acetylation and methylation at the Arabidopsis central clock loci. Mol Cells 34:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sun L, Miao X, Cui J, Deng J, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gao S, Yang K (2018) Genome wide high-resolution mapping of DNA methylation identifies epigenetic variation across different salt stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 214:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tian L, Fong MP, Wang JJ, Wei NE, Jian H, Doerge RW, Chen ZJ (2005) Reversible histone acetylation and deacetylation mediate genome-wide, promoter-dependent and locus-specific changes in gene expression during plant development. Genetics 169:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ulker B, Shahid Mukhtar M, Somssich IE (2007) The WRKY70 transcription factor of Arabidopsis influences both the plant senescence and defense signaling pathways. Planta 226:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T-Y, Peng W, Zhang MQ, Zhao K (2008) Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 40:897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang X, Yan Y, Li Y, Chu X, Wu C et al (2014) GhWRKY40, a multiple stress-responsive cotton WRKY gene, plays an important role in the wounding response and enhances susceptibility to Ralstonia solanacearum infection in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 9:e93577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang J, Tao F, An F, Zou Y, Tian W, Chen X, Xu X, Hu X (2016) Wheat transcription factor TaWRKY70 is positively involved in high-temperature seedling-plant resistance to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici: TaWRKY70 regulated wheat HTSP resistance to Pst. Mol Plant Pathol 18:649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wu C-H, Derevnina L, Kamoun S (2018) Receptor networks underpin plant immunity. Nature 360:1300–1301Google Scholar
  74. Xu X, Chen C, Fan B, Chen Z (2006) Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 18:1310–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN Jr (2006) Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinform 7:85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang MQ (2007) Computational analysis of eukaryotic promoters. BMC Bioinform 8(6):S3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang L, Qiu Z, Hu Y, Yang F, Yan S, Zhao L, Li B, He S, Huang M, Li J (2011) ABA treatment of germinating maize seeds induces VP1 gene expression and selective promoter associated histone acetylation. Physiol Plant 12:77–82Google Scholar
  78. Zhang H, Lu Y, Zhao Y, Zhou D (2016a) OsSRT1 is involved in rice seed development through regulation of starch metabolism gene expression. Plant Sci 248:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang Y, Song L, Liang W, Mu P, Wang S, Lin Q (2016b) Comprehensive profiling of lysine acetylproteome analysis reveals diverse functions of lysine acetylation in common wheat. Sci Rep 6:21069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang W, Fan X, Gao Y, Liu L, Sun L, Su Q, Han J, Zhang N, Cui F, Ji J, Tong Y, Li J (2017) Chromatin modification contributes to expression divergence of three TaGS2 homeologs in hexaploid wheat. Sci Rep 7:44677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhou J, Wang X, He K, Charron J-BF, Elling AA, Deng XW (2010) Genome-wide profiling of histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation and demethylation in Arabidopsis reveals correlation between multiple histone marks and gene expression. Plant Mol Biol 72:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chanchal Sharma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Santosh Kumar
    • 3
  • Gautam Saripalli
    • 1
  • Neelu Jain
    • 4
  • Saurabh Raghuvanshi
    • 3
  • J. B. Sharma
    • 4
  • K. V. Prabhu
    • 4
  • P. K. Sharma
    • 1
  • H. S. Balyan
    • 1
  • P. K. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingCh. Charan Singh UniversityMeerutIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, College of EngineeringDaegu UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Plant Molecular BiologyUniversity of Delhi South CampusNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Division of GeneticsICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations