The Bear Giant-Skipper genome suggests genetic adaptations to living inside yucca roots
Giant-Skippers (Megathymini) are unusual thick-bodied, moth-like butterflies whose caterpillars feed inside Yucca roots and Agave leaves. Giant-Skippers are attributed to the subfamily Hesperiinae and they are endemic to southern and mostly desert regions of the North American continent. To shed light on the genotypic determinants of their unusual phenotypic traits, we sequenced and annotated a draft genome of the largest Giant-Skipper species, the Bear (Megathymus ursus violae). The Bear skipper genome is the least heterozygous among sequenced Lepidoptera genomes, possibly due to much smaller population size and extensive inbreeding. Their lower heterozygosity helped us to obtain a high-quality genome with an N50 of 4.2 Mbp. The ~ 430 Mb genome encodes about 14000 proteins. Phylogenetic analysis supports placement of Giant-Skippers with Grass-Skippers (Hesperiinae). We find that proteins involved in odorant and taste sensing as well as in oxidative reactions have diverged significantly in Megathymus as compared to Lerema, another Grass-Skipper. In addition, the Giant-Skipper has lost several odorant and gustatory receptors and possesses many fewer (1/3–1/2 of other skippers) anti-oxidative enzymes. Such differences may be related to the unusual life style of Giant-Skippers: they do not feed as adults, and their caterpillars feed inside Yuccas and Agaves, which provide a source of antioxidants such as polyphenols.
KeywordsSkipper butterflies Root borers Comparative genomics Antioxidants
We thank Lisa N. Kinch for suggestions and proofreading of the manuscript. We are grateful to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (Natural Resources Program Director David H. Riskind) for the research permit #08-02Rev. Qian Cong was a Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research fellow when these studies were performed. We thank Greg M. Lasley for the photograph of a live male shown in Fig. 4B.
Q. and NVG collected the specimens, QC designed and carried out the experiments, performed the computational analyses and drafted the manuscript; WL performed the analysis of genome quality; DB and ZO designed and supervised experimental studies; NVG directed the project and drafted the sections of the manuscript. All authors wrote the manuscript.
This work was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM094575 and GM127390 to NVG) and the Welch Foundation (I-1505 to NVG).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Availability of supporting data
See the Supplemental Information for the details of our protocols. Major scripts used in this projects and intermediate results are made available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/LepDB/.
- Chevreux B, Wetter T et al (1999) Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information. Comput Sci Biol 99:45–56Google Scholar
- Foley NM, Springer MS et al (2016) Mammal madness: is the mammal tree of life not yet resolved? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371(1699). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0140
- Freeman HA (1969) Systematic review of the Megathymidae. J Lep Soc 23(1):1–59Google Scholar
- Minno MC (1994) Immature stages of the skipper butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) of the United States; biology, morphology, and descriptions. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
- Mutanen M, Wahlberg N et al (2010) Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies. Proc Biol Sci 277(1695):2839–2848. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0392
- Petterson MA, Wielgus RS (1973) Acceptance of artificial diet by Megathymus streckeri. (Skinner) (Megathymidae). J Res Lepidoptera 12(4):197–198Google Scholar
- Poling OC (1902) A new Megathymus from Arizona. Entomol News 13(4):97–98Google Scholar
- Roever K (1975) Family Megathymidae. In: Howe WH (ed) The butterflies of North America. Doubleday, Garden, pp 411–422Google Scholar
- Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Standford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Smit AFA, Hubley R (2008–2010) http://www.repeatmasker.org RepeatModeler Open-1.0
- Smit AFA, Hubley R et al. (1996–2010) http://www.repeatmasker.org RepeatMasker Open-3.0
- Stallings DB, Turner JR (1956) Notes on Megathymus ursus, with description of a related new species. Lepidopterists’ News 10(1–2):1–8Google Scholar
- Wielgus RS, Wielgus JR et al (1972) A new subspecies of Megathymus ursus Poling (Megathymidae) from Arizona with observations and notes on its distribution and life history. Bull Allyn Museum 9:1–11Google Scholar