Comparative transcriptome analysis of TUCPs in Gossypium hirsutum Ligon-lintless-1 mutant and their proposed functions in cotton fiber development Original Article First Online: 29 August 2018 Abstract
Transcripts of uncertain coding potential (TUCP) are part of the LncRNAs, which encode some polypeptides. However, the abundance of TUCP transcripts and their roles in Ligon-linless-1 (
Li-1) cotton mutant during the early termination of fiber development are still not documented. Li-1 mutant is one of the excellent modules for investigating fiber elongation processes due to its unique fiber developmental stages. To examine the function of TUCP in cotton fiber development, it is important to identify TUCPs and their involvement in fiber development. In this study, we found that 11104 TUCP transcripts were removed by coding potential criteria of Pfam domain scan. Additionally, differential expression levels of TUCP transcripts were detected between Li-1 mutant and the wild-type (WT), which imply their possible functions in cotton fiber development. These results further revealed that a great number of differentially expressed TUCP transcripts in cotton were identified at 8 DPA, followed by 0 DPA and stem. However, these might explain an undesirable function in cotton fiber development. The gene ontology and pathway analysis, based on differential expression patterns of TUCP transcripts on targeted genes, identified the transport process, cytoskeleton structure, membrane permeability and fatty acids. These give new insight into significant involvement in early cessation of cotton fiber development and abnormal stem. The RNA-seq and qRT-PCR expression analyses of TUCP transcripts evidently singled out three possible genes, TUCP_010675, TUCP_001475, TUCP_009444 and other targeted mRNAs. The expression pattern of TUCP transcripts and their mRNA targets provided valuable evidence for further investigations on the biological functions of TUCP in cotton fiber development. The study findings may serve as a useful tool for comparative analysis of TUCP transcripts in cotton species and assist in selection of the applicable candidate genes for further functional analyses, genetic improvement and genetic engineering of cotton fiber development. Keywords Comparative analysis Expression pattern TUCPs Ligon-lintless-1 mutant Wild-type Fiber development Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (
) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1482-x Notes Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the support of the National Natural Science Fundation of China (No. 31601353) and the National Key Project of Research and Development Plan (No. 2016YFD0100203).
This study was supported by the National Science and Technology of China and China Scholarship Council (CSC) all contributed with funding towards the research.
Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare(s) that they have no competing interests.
Availability of materials and data
All related data are available within the manuscript and its additional files.
Supplementary material 438_2018_1482_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (10 kb)
Supplementary figure 1. Pearson Correlation Coefficient of the genes identified different cotton samples. (PDF 10 KB) 438_2018_1482_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (372 kb)
Supplementary figure 2. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of TUCP transcripts-target genes. (A) Up-regulated and down-regulated genes at 8 DPA; (B) Up-regulated and down-regulated genes at cotton stem. (PDF 372 KB) 438_2018_1482_MOESM3_ESM.xls (2 mb)
Supplementary table 1. List of TUCP transcripts identified by RNA-seq, including the position and expression pattern in each sample with three biological replicates. (XLS 2023 KB) References
Aslam U, Cheema HMN, Ahmad S et al (2016) COTIP: cotton TILLING platform, a resource for plant improvement and reverse genetic studies. Front Plant Sci.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01863 Google Scholar
Bhartiya D, Pal K, Ghosh S et al (2013) LncRNome: a comprehensive knowledgebase of human long noncoding RNAs. Database.
https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bat034 Google Scholar
Bolton JJ, Soliman KM, Wilkins T, Jenkins JN (2009) Aberrant expression of critical genes during secondary cell wall biogenesis in a cotton mutant, ligon lintless-1 (Li-1). Comp Funct Genom 2009:659301.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/659301 CrossRef Google Scholar
Cabili MN, Trapnell C, Goff L et al (2011) Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.17446611 Google Scholar
Chaudhary B, Hovav R, Rapp R et al (2008) Global analysis of gene expression in cotton fibers from wild and domesticated
. Evol Dev 10:567–582.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00272.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Chen H (2014) Biotechnology of lignocellulose: theory and practice, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6898-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
Deng T, Yao H, Wang J et al (2016) GhLTPG1, a cotton GPI-anchored lipid transfer protein, regulates the transport of phosphatidylinositol monophosphates and cotton fiber elongation. Sci Rep.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26829 Google Scholar
DerMardirossian C, Bokoch GM (2005) GDIs: Central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol 15:356–363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.05.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ding M, Jiang Y, Cao Y et al (2014) Gene expression profile analysis of Ligon lintless-1 (Li1) mutant reveals important genes and pathways in cotton leaf and fiber development. Gene 535:273–285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.11.017 CrossRef Google Scholar
Fukata M, Kaibuchi K (2001) Rho-family GTPases in cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:887–897
CrossRef Google Scholar
Ghanbarian AT, Hurst LD (2015) Neighboring genes show correlated evolution in gene expression. Mol Biol Evol 32:1748–1766.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv053 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gilbert MK, Turley RB, Kim HJ et al (2013) Transcript profiling by microarray and marker analysis of the short cotton (
L.) fiber mutant Ligon lintless-1 (Li1). BMC Genom 14:403.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-403 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gilbert MK, Kim HJ, Tang Y et al (2014) Comparative transcriptome analysis of short fiber mutants ligon-lintless 1 and 2 reveals common mechanisms pertinent to fiber elongation in cotton (
L.). PLoS One 9:23–25.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095554 Google Scholar
Giovane A, Servillo L, Balestrieri C et al (2004) Pectin methylesterase inhibitor. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom 1696:245–252
CrossRef Google Scholar
Hakoshima T, Shimizu T, Maesaki R (2003) Structural basis of the Rho GTPase signaling. J Biochem 134:327–331
CrossRef Google Scholar
Hou M, Tang X, Tian F et al (2016) AnnoLnc: a web server for systematically annotating novel human lncRNAs. BMC Genom 17:931.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3287-9 CrossRef Google Scholar
Karaca M, Saha S, Jenkins JN et al (1999) Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers linked to the Ligon lintless (Li(1)) mutant in cotton. J Hered 93:221–224
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C et al (2013) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14:R36.
https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kohel RJ (1978) Linkage tests in upland Cotton. III 1. Crop Sci 18:844–847
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kohel RJ, Narbuth EV, Benedict CR (1992) Fiber development of Ligon lintless-2 mutant of cotton. Crop Sci 32:733–735 ST
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kondo T, Plaza S, Zanet J et al (2010) Small peptides switch the transcriptional activity of shavenbaby during drosophila embryogenesis. Science 329:336–339.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188158 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kong L, Zhang Y, Ye Z et al (2007) CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine. Nucleic Acids Res 35:345–349.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm391 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kumar S, Pandey P, Kumar K et al (2015) Delineating the glycoproteome of elongating cotton fiber cells. Data Br 5:717–725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.10.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 9:559.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 CrossRef Google Scholar
Lee JJ, Hassan OSS, Gao W et al (2006) Developmental and gene expression analyses of a cotton naked seed mutant. Planta 223:418–432.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0098-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li XB, Cai L, Cheng NH, Liu JW (2002) Molecular characterization of the cotton GhTUB1 gene that is preferentially expressed in fiber. Plant Physiol 130:666–674.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.005538 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li W, Shang H, Ge Q et al (2016) Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression analysis of pectin methylesterases reveal their major role in cotton fiber development. BMC Genom.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3365-z Google Scholar
Liang W, Fang L, Xiang D et al (2015) Transcriptome analysis of short fiber mutant ligon lintless-1 (Li 1) reveals critical genes and key pathways in cotton fiber elongation and leaf development. PLoS One 1:1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143503 Google Scholar
Liu K, Sun J, Yao L, Yuan Y (2012) Transcriptome analysis reveals critical genes and key pathways for early cotton fiber elongation in Ligon lintless-1 mutant. Genomics 100:42–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real- time quantitative PCR and the 2 −∆∆C T method. Gene Expr 408:402–408.
https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 Google Scholar
Ma Q, Wu M, Pei W et al (2014) Quantitative phosphoproteomic profiling of fiber differentiation and initiation in a fiberless mutant of cotton. BMC Genom 15:466.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-466 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ma Q-F, Wu C-H, Wu M et al (2016) Integrative transcriptome, proteome, phosphoproteome and genetic mapping reveals new aspects in a fiberless mutant of cotton. Sci Rep 6:24485.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24485 CrossRef Google Scholar
Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N (2011) In vitro induction of mutation in cotton (
L.) and isolation of mutants with improved yield and fiber characters. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1793–1801.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0718-8 CrossRef Google Scholar
Nagawa S, Xu T, Yang Z (2010) RHO GTPase in plants: conservation and invention of regulators and effectors. Small GTPases 1:78–88.
https://doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.1.2.14544 CrossRef Google Scholar
Punta M, Coggill P, Eberhardt R et al (2012) The Pfam protein families databases. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D290–D301.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp985 CrossRef Google Scholar
Qin Y-M, Hu C-Y, Pang Y et al (2007) Saturated very-long-chain fatty acids promote cotton fiber and arabidopsis cell elongation by activating ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Cell Online 19:3692–3704.
https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.054437 CrossRef Google Scholar
Rong J, Pierce GJ, Waghmare VN et al (2005) Genetic mapping and comparative analysis of seven mutants related to seed fiber development in cotton. Theor Appl Genet 111:1137–1146.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0041-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
Salih H, Gong W, He S et al (2016a) Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of MYB transcription factors in
. BMC Genet.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0436-8 Google Scholar
Salih H, Leng X, He S-P et al (2016b) Characterization of the early fiber development gene, Ligon-lintless 1 (Li1), using microarray. Plant Gene 6:59–66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2016.03.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Shi YH, Zhu SW, Mao XZ et al (2006) Transcriptome profiling, molecular biological, and physiological studies reveal a major role for ethylene in cotton fiber cell elongation. Plant Cell 18:651–664.
https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.040303 CrossRef Google Scholar
Thyssen GN, Fang DD, Turley RB et al (2014) Next generation genetic mapping of the Ligon-lintless-2 (Li
) locus in upland cotton (
L.). Theor Appl Genet 127:2183–2192.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2372-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
Thyssen GN, Fang DD, Turley RB et al (2017) A Gly65Val substitution in an actin, GhACT_LI1, disrupts cell polarity and F-actin organization resulting in dwarf, lintless cotton plants. Plant J 90:111–121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13477 CrossRef Google Scholar
Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G et al (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 28:511–515.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1621 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wakelyn PJ, Bertoniere NR, French AD et al (2006) Cotton fiber chemistry and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 176
CrossRef Google Scholar
Wan Q, Zhang H, Ye W et al (2014) Genome-wide transcriptome profiling revealed cotton fuzz fiber development having a similar molecular model as arabidopsis trichome. PLoS One 9:1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097313 Google Scholar
Washietl S, Kellis M, Garber M (2014) Evolutionary dynamics and tissue specificity of human long noncoding RNAs in six mammals. Genome Res 24:616–628.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.165035.113 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang TZ, Pan JJ (1991) Genetic analysis of a fuzzless-lintless mutant in
L. Jiangsu J Agric Sci 7:13–16 (
ST–Genetic analysis of a fuzzless–lintles
Zhang T, Hu Y, Jiang W et al (2015) Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (
L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol 33:531–537.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3207 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhao P-M, Wang L-L, Han L-B et al (2010) Proteomic identification of differentially expressed proteins in the Ligon lintless mutant of upland cotton (
L.). J Proteome Res 9:1076–1087.
https://doi.org/10.1021/pr900975t CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhu QH, Yuan Y, Stiller W et al (2018) Genetic dissection of the fuzzless seed trait in
. J Exp Bot 69:997–1009.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx459 CrossRef Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018