Mapping SNP-anchored genes using high-resolution melting analysis in almond
- 436 Downloads
Peach and almond have been considered as model species for the family Rosaceae and other woody plants. Consequently, mapping and characterisation of genes in these species has important implications. High-resolution melting (HRM) analysis is a recent development in the detection of SNPs and other markers, and proved to be an efficient and cost-effective approach. In this study, we aimed to map genes corresponding to known proteins in other species using the HRM approach. Prunus unigenes were searched and compared with known proteins in the public databases. We developed single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, polymorphic in a mapping population produced from a cross between the cloned cultivars Nonpareil and Lauranne. A total of 12 SNP-anchored putative genes were genotyped in the population using HRM, and mapped to an existing linkage map. These genes were mapped on six linkage groups, and the predicted proteins were compared to putative orthologs in other species. Amongst those genes, four were abiotic stress-responsive genes, which can provide a starting point for construction of an abiotic resistance map. Two allergy and detoxification related genes, respectively, were also mapped and analysed. Most of the investigated genes had high similarities to sequences from closely related species such as apricot, apple and other eudicots, and these are putatively orthologous. In addition, it was shown that HRM can be an effective means of genotyping populations for the purpose of constructing a linkage map. Our work provides basic genomic information for the 12 genes, which can be used for further genetic and functional studies.
KeywordsAlmond SNP Mapping HRM Protein similarity
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council Grant No. DP0556459.
- Abbott AG, Lecouls AC, Wang Y, Georgi L, Scorza R, Reighard G (2002) Peach: the model genome for Rosaceae genomics. Acta Hortic 592:199–209Google Scholar
- Bielenberg D, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhebentyayeva T, Fan S, Reighard G, Scorza R, Abbott A (2008) Sequencing and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] reveals a cluster of six MADS-box transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of terminal bud formation. Tree Genet Genomes 4:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eldredge L, Ballard R, Baird WV, Abbott A, Morgens P, Callahan A, Scorza R, Monet R (1992) Application of RFLP analysis to genetic-linkage mapping in peaches. Hortscience 27:160–163Google Scholar
- Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6a2 Department of Genetics, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Gregory D, Sedgley M, Wirthensohn MG, Arús P, Kaiser B, Collins GG (2005) An integrated genetic linkage map for almond based on RAPD, ISSR, SSR and morphological markers. Acta Hortic 694:67–72Google Scholar
- Han S, Seo Y, Kim D, Sung S-K, Kim W (2007) Expression of MdCAS1 and MdCAS2, encoding apple β-cyanoalanine synthase homologs, is concomitantly induced during ripening and implicates MdCASs in the possible role of the cyanide detoxification in Fuji apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruits. Plant Cell Rep 26:1321–1331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamboy WF, Alpha CG (1998) Using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) for DNA fingerprinting germplasm accessions of grape (Vitis L.) species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:182–188Google Scholar
- Okubara PA, Berry AM (1999) DgPDI (Accession No. AF131223), a full-length cDNA from symbiotic root nodules of Datisca glomerata with homology to protein disulfide isomerase genes. Plant Physiol 119:1568Google Scholar
- Tavassolian I (2008) Construction of a microsatellite-based genetic linkage map of almond. PhD thesis, The University of AdelaideGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) JoinMap® 3.0. Software for the calculation of genetic linikage maps. Plant Research International, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Weeden NF (1994) Approaches to mapping in horticultural crops. In: Gresshoff P (ed) Plant genome analysis. CRC Press, Florida, pp 57–68Google Scholar