Molecular Genetics and Genomics

, Volume 270, Issue 3, pp 225–233 | Cite as

Autocrine activation of the pheromone response pathway in matα2 - cells is attenuated by SST2- and ASG7-dependent mechanisms

  • D. M. Rivers
  • G. F. SpragueJr.
Original Paper


Yeast mat α2 mutants express both mating pheromones and both mating pheromone receptors. They show modest signaling in the pheromone response pathway, as revealed by increased levels of FUS1 transcript, yet are resistant to pheromone treatment. Together, these phenotypes suggest that α2- cells undergo autocrine activation of the pheromone response pathway, which is subsequently attenuated. We constructed a regulatable version of the α2 gene (GALα2) and showed that, upon loss of α2 activity, cells exhibit an initial robust response to pheromone that is attenuated within 3 h. We reasoned that the viability of α2- cells might be due to attenuation, and therefore performed a genome-wide synthetic lethal screen to identify potential adaptation components. We identified two genes, SST2 and ASG7. Loss of either of these attenuation components results in activation of the pheromone pathway in α2- cells. Loss of both proteins causes a more severe phenotype. Sst2 functions as a GTPase activating protein (GAP) for the G α subunit of the trimeric G protein. Asg7 is an a -cell specific protein that acts in concert with the α-cell specific a -factor receptor, Ste3, to inhibit signaling by Gβγ. Hence, our results suggest that mat α2 mutants mimic the intracellular signaling events that occur in newly fused zygotes.


MATα2  SST2  ASG7 Attenuation Zygote formation 



We would like to thank Susan Michaelis for suggesting the screen. We would also like to thank Duane Jenness for providing the Ste4 antibody and April Goehring, Hilary Kemp, Megan Keniry, and Paul Cullen for helpful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by research (GM-30027) and training (HD07348) grants from the National Institutes of Health


  1. Ammerer G, Sprague GF Jr, Bender A (1985) Control of yeast alpha-specific genes: evidence for two blocks to expression in MAT a/MATalpha diploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5855–5859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Apanovitch DM, Slep KC, Sigler PB, Dohlman HG (1998) Sst2 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gpa1: purification and characterization of a cognate RGS-Galpha protein pair in yeast. Biochemistry 37:4815–4822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender A, Sprague GF Jr (1987) MAT alpha 1 protein, a yeast transcription activator, binds synergistically with a second protein to a set of cell-type-specific genes. Cell 50:681–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender A, Sprague GF Jr (1989) Pheromones and pheromone receptors are the primary determinants of mating specificity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 121:463–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T (2000) Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.Google Scholar
  6. Chan RK, Otte CA (1982a) Isolation and genetic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by a factor and alpha factor pheromones. Mol Cell Biol 2:11–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan RK, Otte CA (1982b) Physiological characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by a factor and alpha factor pheromones. Mol Cell Biol 2:21–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen T, Kurjan J (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mpt5p interacts with Sst2p and plays roles in pheromone sensitivity and recovery from pheromone arrest. Mol Cell Biol 17:3429–3439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis C, Dube P, Konopka JB (1998) Afr1p regulates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-factor receptor by a mechanism that is distinct from receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis. Genetics 148:625–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis NG, Horecka JL, Sprague GF Jr (1993) Cis - and trans -acting functions required for endocytosis of the yeast pheromone receptors. J Cell Biol 122:53–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Demattei CR, Davis CP, Konopka JB (2000) Point mutations identify a conserved region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae AFR1 gene that is essential for both the pheromone signaling and morphogenesis functions. Genetics 155:43–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietzel C, Kurjan J (1987) Pheromonal regulation and sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SST2 gene: a model for desensitization to pheromone. Mol Cell Biol 7:4169–4177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dohlman HG, Thorner JW (2001) Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. Annu Rev Biochem 70:703–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doi K, Gartner A, Ammerer G, Errede B, Shinkawa H, Sugimoto K, Matsumoto K (1994) MSG5, a novel protein phosphatase, promotes adaptation to pheromone response in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J 13:61–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan JW, Fields S (1991) Cell-type-specific transcription in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 1088:155–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng Y, Davis NG (2000) Akr1p and the type I casein kinases act prior to the ubiquitination step of yeast endocytosis: Akr1p is required for kinase localization to the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol 20:5350–5359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, Willems AR, Woods RA (1995) Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 11:355–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Givan SA, Sprague GF Jr (1997) The ankyrin repeat-containing protein Akr1p is required for the endocytosis of yeast pheromone receptors. Mol Biol Cell 8:1317–1327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guthrie C, Fink GR (1991) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagen DC, McCaffrey G, Sprague GF Jr (1991) Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11:2952–2961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagen DC, Bruhn L, Westby CA, Sprague GF Jr (1993) Transcription of alpha-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: DNA sequence requirements for activity of the coregulator alpha 1. Mol Cell Biol 13:6866–6875PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Horecka J, Jigami Y (1999) The trp1-delta FA designer deletion for PCR-based gene functional analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:1769–1774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarvis EE, Hagen DC, Sprague GF Jr (1988) Identification of a DNA segment that is necessary and sufficient for alpha-specific gene control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for regulation of alpha-specific and a-specific genes. Mol Cell Biol 8:309–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson AD, Herskowitz I (1985) A repressor (MAT alpha 2 product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast. Cell 42:237–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim J, Bortz E, Zhong H, Leeuw T, Leberer E, Vershon AK Hirsch JP (2000) Localization and signaling of G(beta) subunit Ste4p are controlled by a-factor receptor and the a-specific protein Asg7p. Mol Cell Biol 20:8826–8835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Konopka JB (1993) AFR1 acts in conjunction with the alpha-factor receptor to promote morphogenesis and adaptation. Mol Cell Biol 13:6876–6888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuchler K, Sterne RE, Thorner J (1989) Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE6 gene product: a novel pathway for protein export in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J 8:3973–3984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Longtine MS, Mckenzie A 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Roth AF, Nelson B, Boone C, Davis NG (2000) Asg7p-Ste3p inhibition of pheromone signaling: regulation of the zygotic transition to vegetative growth. Mol Cell Biol 20:8815–8825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sprague GF Jr (1990) Combinatorial associations of regulatory proteins and the control of cell type in yeast. Adv Genet 27:33–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sprague GF Jr, Jensen R, Herskowitz I (1983) Control of yeast cell type by the mating type locus: positive regulation of the alpha-specific STE3 gene by the MAT alpha 1 product. Cell 32:409–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, Page N, Robinson M, Raghibizadeh S, Hogue CW, Bussey H, Andrews B, Tyers M, Boone C (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364–2368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Whiteway M, Hougan L, Dignard D, Thomas DY, Bell L, Saari GC, Grant FJ, O'Hara P, Mackay VL (1989) The STE4 and STE18 genes of yeast encode potential beta and gamma subunits of the mating factor receptor-coupled G protein. Cell 56:467–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu BE, Skowronek KR, Kurjan J (2001) The N terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sst2p plays an RGS-domain-independent, Mpt5p-dependent role in recovery from pheromone arrest. Genetics 159:1559–1571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhan XL, Deschenes RJ, Guan KL (1997) Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 11:1690–1702PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Molecular BiologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations