Efficacy of ivermectin and moxidectin injection against larvae of wohlfahrtia magnifica (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in sheep
- 58 Downloads
The therapeutic efficacies of ivermectin (Ivomec injection, Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V.) and moxidectin (Cydectin 1% injection, American Cyanamid Company) were evaluated in sheep naturally infested with larvae of Wohlfahrtia magnified. Sheep were randomly allocated to one of the 2 groups, each consisting of 19 animals. Sheep in one group received ivermectin and those in the other, moxidectin by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight. Evaluation was performed at 19, 24, 28, 39, 43, 48, 52, 63, 67, 72, 87, 96, 120, 144 and 168 h after treatment. At 144 and 168 h post-treatment, late third-instar larvae were collected from wounds of four sheep in both groups and from untreated, infested sheep. These larvae were reared in the laboratory to assess adult emergence. Neither ivermectin nor moxidectin was effective as a rapid acting treatment or as a long-term, or even short-term, prophylactic. Despite the treatment, 30–40% of sheep had live larvae at every evaluation. Although larvae disappeared from the wounds of some sheep in both groups after the treatment, the wounds in these animals failed to recover and were reinfested by larvae of W. magnified. On day 7 post-treatment the trial had to be finished because the majority of treated sheep were severely infested by Wohlfahrtia maggots. The average number of infested sheep in the two groups and the number of adults that were produced from larvae collected from treated sheep indicate that ivermectin and moxidectin did not differ significantly in efficacy.
KeywordsIvermectin Diazinon Abamectin Moxidectin Myiasis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hadani A, Rabinsky R, Shimshoni A, Vishinsky Y (1971) Myiasis caused by Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Schiner) in sheep on the Golan Heights. Refu Vet 28:25–33Google Scholar
- Hadani A, Ben Yaakov B, Rosen S (1989) Myiasis caused by Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Schiner, 1862) in the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) in the Peninsula of Sinai. Rev Med Vet Trop 42:33–38Google Scholar
- Ishimbekov ZM, Zhanuzakov NH (1983a) Wohlfahrtia infestation in sheep: epizootiology and pathomorphology. Veterinariya 6:19–20Google Scholar
- Ishimbekov ZM, Zhanuzakov NZ (1983b) Wohlfahrtiasis of sheep in Kazakhstan and prophylactic measures against it. In: Zhanuzakov NZ (ed) Parazitozy sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh Kazakhstana i mery ikh preduprezhdeniya (in Russian). Kazakhskii Nauchno-Issledovatel’ skii Veterinarnyi Institut, Alma-Ata, pp 52–61Google Scholar
- Kostov R, Vitanov I, Denev I, Reikov R (1986) Comparative study of therapeutic effects of some preparations against myiasis in sheep. Vet Sbirka 84:26–28Google Scholar
- Lehrer Z, Lehrer M, Verstraeten C (1988) Les myiases causées aux moutons de Roumanie par Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Schiner) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Ann Med Vet 132:475–81Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Martinez I, Soler-Cruz MD, Benitez-Rodriguez R, DiazLopez M, Munoz-Parra S, Florido-Navio A (1987) Myiasis caused by Wohlfahrtia magnifica in southern Spain. Isr J Vet Med 43:34–41Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Martinez I, Soler-Cruz MD, Benitez-Rodriguez R, Perez-Jimenez JM, Diaz-Lopez M (1991) Myiasis caused by Wohlfahrtia magnifica in sheep and goats in southern Spain. II. Effect of age, body region and sex on larval infestation. Isr J Vet Med 46:64–68Google Scholar
- Sachs L (1992) Angewandte Statistik, 7th edn. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Zumpf F (1965) Myiasis in man and animals in the Old World: a textbook for physicians, veterinarians and zoologists. Butter-worths, LondonGoogle Scholar