Parasitology Research

, Volume 118, Issue 6, pp 1993–1998 | Cite as

The Drosophila melanogaster antimicrobial peptides Mtk-1 and Mtk-2 are active against the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum

  • Miray TonkEmail author
  • Christine Pierrot
  • Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
  • Mohammad Rahnamaeian
  • Jamal Khalife
  • Andreas Vilcinskas
Protozoology - Short Communication


Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are important components of the vertebrate and invertebrate innate immune systems. Although AMPs are widely recognized for their broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses, their activity against protozoan parasites has not been investigated in detail. In this study, we tested 10 AMPs from three different insect species: the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (cecropin A–D), the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (drosocin, Mtk-1 and Mtk-2), and the blow fly Lucilia sericata (LSerPRP-2, LSerPRP-3 and stomoxyn). We tested each AMP against the protozoan parasite Plasmodium falciparum which is responsible for the most severe form of malaria in humans. We also evaluated the impact of these insect AMPs on mouse and pig erythrocytes. Whereas all AMPs showed low hemolytic effects towards mouse and pig erythrocytes, only D. melanogaster Mtk-1 and Mtk-2 significantly inhibited the growth of P. falciparum at low concentrations. Mtk-1 and Mtk-2 could therefore be considered as leads for the development of antiparasitic drugs targeting the clinically important asexual blood stage of P. falciparum.


Insect antimicrobial peptides Metchnikowin Drosophila melanogaster Galleria mellonella Lucilia sericata 



We thank Dr. Richard M. Twyman for editing the manuscript, Dr. Irina Häcker for providing pig blood, and Sophia Lafitte for technical assistance.

Funding information

The authors would like to acknowledge generous funding by the Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) via the LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) and the LOEWE Center for Insect Biotechnology and Bioresources.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

436_2019_6305_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (109 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1 Representative illustration of flow cytometry analysis ofPlasmodiumgrowth inhibition. Non infected (A) or P. falciparum-infected human erythrocytes (B, C) were incubated with vehicle (B) or with 50 μM Mtk-1 AMP (C) for 48 h at 37 °C. Red blood cells were gated according to their FSC-SSC parameters (dot plots, left panels, P2) and parasites were detected among them as SybrGreen-positive cells (histograms, right panels, P3). Total red blood cells (P2) represent 94.4%, 90.4% and 92.5% of total events for non-infected negative control (A), infected positive control (B) and Mtk-1-treated parasites (C) respectively. SybrGreen-positive cells detected in (A) correspond to staining background. (JPG 108 kb)


  1. Bechinger B (2004) Structure and function of membrane-lytic peptides. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23(3):271–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bencivengo AM, Cudic M, Hoffmann R, Otvos L (2001) The efficacy of the antibacterial peptide, pyrrhocoricin, is finely regulated by its amino acid residues and active domains. LIPS 8:201–209Google Scholar
  3. Bolouri Moghaddam MR, Tonk M, Schreiber C, Salzig D, Czermak P, Vilcinskas A, Rahnamaeian M (2016) The potential of the Galleria mellonella innate immune system is maximized by the co-presentation of diverse antimicrobial peptides. Biol Chem 1:939–945Google Scholar
  4. Bolouri Moghaddam MR, Vilcinskas A, Rahnamaeian M (2017a) The insect-derived antimicrobial peptide metchnikowin targets Fusarium graminearum β(1,3) glucanosyltransferase Gel1, which is required for the maintenance of cell wall integrity. Biol Chem 398:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolouri Moghaddam MR, Gross T, Becker A, Vilcinskas A, Rahnamaeian M (2017b) The selective antifungal activity of Drosophila melanogaster metchnikowin reflects the species-dependent inhibition of succinate-coenzyme Q reductase. Sci Rep 7(1):8192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulet P, Dimarcq JL, Hetru C, Lagueux M, Charlet M, Hegy G, Van Dorsselaer A, Hoffmann JA (1993) A novel inducible antibacterial peptide of Drosophila carries an O-glycosylated substitution. J Biol Chem 15:14893–14897Google Scholar
  7. El Chamy Maluf S, Dal Mas C, Oliveira E, Melo P, Carmona A, Gazarini M, Hayashi M (2016) Inhibition of malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum development by crotamine, a cell penetrating peptide from the snake venom. Peptides 78:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fréville A, Cailliau-Maggio K, Pierrot C, Tellier G, Kalamou G, Lafitte S, Martoriati A, Pierce RJ, Bodart JF, Khalife J (2013) Plasmodium falciparum encodes a conserved active inhibitor-2 for protein phosphatase type 1: perspectives for novel anti-plasmodial therapy. BMC Biol 11:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemingway J, Shretta R, Wells TN, Bell D, Djimdé AA, Achee N, Qi G (2016) Tools and strategies for malaria control and elimination: what do we need to achieve a grand convergence in malaria? PLoS Biol 14:e1002380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Izumiyama S, Omura M, Takasaki T, Ohmae H, Asahi H (2009) Plasmodium falciparum: development and validation of a measure of intraerythrocytic growth using SYBR Green I in a flow cytometer. Exp Parasitol 121:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levashina EA, Ohresser S, Bulet P, Reichhart JM, Hetru C, Hoffmann JA (1995) Metchnikowin, a novel immune-inducible proline-rich peptide from Drosophila with antibacterial and antifungal properties. FEBS J 233:694–700Google Scholar
  12. Mak P, Chmiel D, Gacek GJ (2001) Antibacterial peptides of the moth Galleria mellonella. Acta Biochim Pol 48:1191–1195Google Scholar
  13. Mason AJ, Moussaoui W, Abdelrahman T, Boukhari A, Bertani P, Marquette A, Shooshtarizaheh P, Moulay G, Boehm N, Guerold B (2009) Structural determinants of antimicrobial and antiplasmodial activity and selectivity in histidine-rich amphipathic cationic peptides. J Biol Chem 284:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mylonakis E, Podsiadlowski L, Muhammed M, Vilcinskas A (2016) Diversity, evolution and medical applications of insect antimicrobial peptides. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371:20150290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pöppel AK, Vogel H, Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A (2015) Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:2508–2514Google Scholar
  16. Pretzel J, Mohring F, Rahlfs S, Becker K (2013) Antiparasitic peptides. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 135:157–192Google Scholar
  17. Rahnamaeian M, Vilcinskas A (2012) Defense gene expression is potentiated in transgenic barley expressing antifungal peptide metchnikowin throughout powdery mildew challenge. J Plant Res 125:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rahnamaeian M, Langen G, Imani J, Khalifa W, Altincicek B, von Wettstein D, Kogel KH, Vilcinskas A (2009) Insect peptide metchnikowin confers on barley a selective capacity for resistance to ascomycetes fungal pathogens. J Exp Bot 60:4105–4114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rahnamaeian M, Cytryńska M, Zdybicka-Barabas A, Vilcinskas A (2016) The functional interaction between abaecin and pore-forming peptides indicates a general mechanism of antibacterial potentiation. Peptides 78:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodriguez M, Zamudio F, Torres JA, Gonzalezceron L, Possani LD, Rodriguez MH (1995) Effect of a cecropin-like synthetic peptide (Shiva-3) on the sporogonic development of Plasmodium berghei. Exp Parasitol 80:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shahabuddin M, Fields I, Bulet P, Hoffmann JA, Miller LH (1998) Plasmodium gallinaceum: differential killing of some mosquito stages of the parasite by insect defensin. Exp Parasitol 89:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tonk M, Vilcinskas A (2017) The medical potential of antimicrobial peptides from insects. Curr Top Med Chem 17:554–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. World Health Organization (2018) Malaria fact sheet. Available at Accessed 29 Nov 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miray Tonk
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Christine Pierrot
    • 4
  • Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
    • 5
  • Mohammad Rahnamaeian
    • 6
  • Jamal Khalife
    • 4
  • Andreas Vilcinskas
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG)FrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Insect BiotechnologyJustus Liebig University of GiessenGiessenGermany
  3. 3.LOEWE Centre for Insect Biotechnology and BioresourcesGiessenGermany
  4. 4.Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille (CIIL), INSERM U1019 – CNRS UMR 8204, Institut Pasteur de LilleUniversité Lille Nord de FranceLilleFrance
  5. 5.UMR BIPAR, INRA, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’AlfortUniversité Paris-EstMaisons-AlfortFrance
  6. 6.Department of BioresourcesFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied EcologyGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations