Evaluation of targeted copper sulfate (CuSO4) application for controlling swimmer’s itch at a freshwater recreation site in Michigan
- 21 Downloads
Swimmer’s itch has historically been controlled by applying copper sulfate (CuSO4) to lakes as a way to eliminate snails that serve as the intermediate hosts for swimmer’s itch-causing parasites. CuSO4 is still sometimes applied specifically to areas of lakes where swimmer’s itch severity is high. It is unclear whether targeted application of chemical molluscicides like CuSO4 is effective for controlling swimmer’s itch. Previous research has found that the larval stage of the parasites responsible for swimmer’s itch are released from infected snails and are concentrated by onshore and alongshore winds, and thus, may not be affected by such focused applications. In this study, we evaluated the impact of targeted CuSO4 application to a specific recreational swimming area in a lake in Michigan. We measured the effect on snail populations, as well as on the presence/abundance of swimmer’s itch-causing parasites using qPCR. Ultimately, while CuSO4 was confirmed to significantly reduce populations of snails within the treatment area, it was found to have no significant impact on swimmer’s itch-causing parasites in the water, likely due to the free-swimming larval stages (cercariae) moving into the treatment area from surrounding regions.
KeywordsSwimmer’s itch Digenetic trematode Schistosome qPCR Water Copper sulfate Chemical treatment
This work was supported by the Michigan Swimmer’s Itch Partnership (RLR), Alberta Environment – Energy and Environment Solutions #2332 (PCH) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada #2018-05209 and 2018-522661 (PCH).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Blankespoor HD, Reimink RL (1991) The control of swimmer’s itch in Michigan: past, present, and future. Mich Acad XXIV:7–23Google Scholar
- Breck, J.E. (2004) Compilation of databases on Michigan lakes. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/2004-2tr_362468_7.pdf Accessed: Feb 13 2019
- Hanson MJ, Heinz GS (1984) Side effects of 58 years of copper sulfate treatment of the Fairmont Lakes, Minnesota. JAWRA 20(6):889–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04797.x Google Scholar
- Jothikumar N, Mull BJ, Brant SV, Loker ES, Collinson J, Secor WE, Hill VR (2015) Real-time PCR and sequencing assays for rapid detection and identification of avian schistosomes in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(12):4207–4215. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00750-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marszewska A, Strzała T, Cichy A, Dąbrowska GB, Żbikowska E (2018) Agents of swimmer’s itch-dangerous minority in the Digenea invasion of Lymnaeidae in water bodies and the first report of Trichobilharzia regenti in Poland. Parasitol Research 117(12):3695–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6068-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (2014) Swimmer’s itch in Michigan. http://www.nstlra.com/Downloads/swimmers_itch_michigan.pdf Accessed on Feb 13 2019
- O’Neal RP, Soulliere GJ (2006) Conservation guidelines for Michigan lakes and associated natural resources. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 38Google Scholar
- Rudolfová J, Sitko J, Horák P. (2002) Nasal schistosomes of wildfowl in the Czech Republic. Parasitol Research 88(12):1093–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-002-0634-3