Distribution of Alaria spp. mesocercariae in waterfrogs
- 48 Downloads
Abstract
The distribution of Alaria-spp.-mesocercariae within the host is relevant for the examination via Alaria spp. mesocercariae migration technique (AMT) regarding predilection sites and may indicate an interaction between parasite and host. Naturally Alaria-exposed frogs of Pelophylax species (n = 13) were examined for systemic distribution and localization-specific parasite density of Alaria spp. mesocercariae. The frogs were necropsied and their body was divided into the following localizations: inner organs, head, torso, forelimbs, and hind limbs. The localizations were analyzed individually and in toto using Alaria spp. mesocercariae migration technique. Our results showed neither statistical differences concerning the number of mesocercariae in the different localizations nor in respect of the rate of positive localizations. Therefore, an accumulation in a particular predilection site seems unlikely. Further research on a representative sample is necessary before final conclusions can be drawn.
Keywords
Distomum musculorum suis Ranidae Pelophylax Predilection site Parasite host relationshipNotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Lia Kieker and Heiko Wellner for their valuable technical assistance in the present study. Further, we would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Rafael Ernst from the Senckenberg World of Biodiversity in Dresden for his assistance in species identification.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
References
- Andreas K (2006) Helminthen einheimischer Froschlurche. Dissertation, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Bugge G (1942a) Das sogen. Muskeldistomum, Agamodistomum suis, ein Bewohner der Bauchhöhle. Tierärztl Rdsch 48:146–151Google Scholar
- Bugge G (1942b) Der Muskelegel Dunckers beim Frosch. Ztschr f Fleisch- u Milchhyg 54:73–76Google Scholar
- Freeman RS, Stuart PF, Cullen SJ, Ritchie AC, Mildon A, Fernandes BJ, Bonin R (1976) Fatal human infection with mesocercariae of the trematode Alaria americana. Am J Trop Med Hyg 25:803–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, Sa RO de, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the AMNH, vol 297, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Makrutzki G, Riehn K, Hamedy A, Petroff D, Hasenclever D, Meiler H, Lücker E (2014) Detecting Trichinella infections using inverse microscopy and an improved larval counting technique. J Helminthol 88:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Möhl K, Grosse K, Hamedy A, Wüste T, Kabelitz P, Lücker E (2009) Biology of Alaria spp. and human exposition risk to Alaria mesocercariae-a review. Parasitol Res 105:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nöllert A, Nöllert C (1992) Die Amphibien Europas: Bestimmung - Gefährdung - Schutz. In: Kosmos-Naturführer. Franckh-Kosmos, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Odening K (1961) Zur Kenntnis des Exkretionssystems einiger digenetischer Trematoden (Unterordnungen Plagiorchiata, Brachylaemata, Strigeata). Z Parasitenkd 20:440–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patrelle C, Portier J, Jouet D, Delorme D, Ferté H (2015) Prevalence and intensity of Alaria alata (Goeze, 1792) in water frogs and brown frogs in natural conditions. Parasitol Res 114:4405–4412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Riehn K, Hamedy A, Alter T, Lücker E (2011) Development of a PCR approach for differentiation of Alaria spp. mesocercariae. Parasitol Res 108:1327–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Riehn K, Hamedy A, Große K, Zeitler L, Lücker E (2010) A novel detection method for Alaria alata mesocercariae in meat. Parasitol Res 107:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shoop WL, Corkum KC (1981) Epidemiology of Alaria marcianae Mesocercariae in Louisiana. J Parasitol 67:928CrossRefGoogle Scholar