Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 115, Issue 5, pp 1871–1881 | Cite as

Genotypic, physiological, and biochemical characterization of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba isolated from the environment in Cairo, Egypt

  • Gihan Mostafa Tawfeek
  • Sawsan Abdel-Hamid Bishara
  • Rania Mohammad SarhanEmail author
  • Eman ElShabrawi Taher
  • Amira ElSaady Khayyal
Original Paper

Abstract

Acanthamoebae are the most common opportunistic amphizoic protozoa that cause life-threatening granulomatous amoebic encephalitis in immunocompromised individuals and sight-threatening amoebic keratitis (AK) in contact lens wearers. The present work aimed to determine the presence of Acanthamoeba isolates in different environmental sources: water, soil, and dust in Cairo, Egypt and to characterize the pathogenic potential of the isolated Acanthamoeba using physiological and biochemical assays as well as determination of the genotypes in an attempt to correlate pathogenicity with certain genotypes. The study included the collection of 22 corneal scrapings from patients complaining of symptoms and signs indicative of acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and 75 environmental samples followed by cultivation on non-nutrient agar plates preseeded with E. coli. Positive samples for Acanthamoeba were subjected to osmo- and thermo-tolerance assays and zymography analysis. Potentially pathogenic isolates were subjected to PCR amplification using genus-specific primer pair. Isolates were classified at the genotype level based on the sequence analysis of Acanthamoeba 18S rRNA gene (diagnostic fragment 3). The total detection rate for Acanthamoeba in environmental samples was 33.3 %, 31.4 % in water, 40 % in soil, and 20 % in dust samples. Three and two Acanthamoeba isolates from water and soil sources, respectively, had the potential for pathogenicity as they exhibited full range of pathogenic traits. Other 12 isolates were designated as weak potential pathogens. Only ten of the environmental isolates were positive in PCR and were classified by genotype analysis into T4 genotype (70 %), T3 (10 %) and T5 (20 %). Potential pathogens belonged to genotypes T4 (from water) and T5 (from soil) while weak potential pathogens belonged to genotypes T3 (from water) and T4 (from water and soil). Additionally, T7 genotype was isolated from keratitis patients. There is a considerable variation in the response of Acanthamoeba members of the same genotype to pathogenicity indicator assays making correlation of pathogenicity with certain genotypes difficult. Presence of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba isolates in habitats related directly to human populations represent a risk for human health. Isolation of Acanthamoeba genotype T7 from AK cases, which is commonly considered as nonpathogenic, might draw the attention to other Acanthamoeba genotypes considered as non pathogenic and reevaluate their role in production of human infections. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the presence and distribution of Acanthamoeba genotypes in the environment, Cairo, Egypt.

Keywords

Acanthamoeba Genotypes Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis Egypt Environmental Physiological Biochemical Characterization Pathogenic 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

An informed consent was taken from patients after explaining the aim of the study to them. The study was started after being approved by the Ethical Committee of Scientific Research, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.

References

  1. Abe N, Kimata I (2010) Genotyping of Acanthamoeba isolates from corneal scrapings and contact lens cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis patients in Osaka, Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis 63:299–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abed GH, Elkabbany MN, Mandour AM, Mohamed MA (2013) Morpho-pathological changes in rat brains after inoculation with Naegleria and Acanthamoeba. Arch Biomed Sci 1(2):9–15Google Scholar
  3. Alfieri SC, Correia CE, Motegi SA, Pral EMF (2000) Proteinase activities in total extracts and in medium conditioned by Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites. J Parasitol 86(2):220–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Herrawy AZ, Bahgat M, Mohammed A, Ashour A, Hikal W (2013) Morpho-physiological and biochemical criteria of Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from the Egyptian aquatic environment. Iranian J Parasitol 8:302–312Google Scholar
  5. Al-Herrawy AZ, Heshmat M, Abu Kabsha SH, Gad MA, Lotfy WN (2015) Occurrence of Acanthamoeba species in the Damanhour Drinking Water Treatment Plant, Behera Governorate (Egypt).Reports in Parasitology 07/2015; 4:15–21. doi: 10.2147/RIP.S85106.
  6. Armand et al. (2015) Isolation and identification of pathogenic free-living amoeba from surface and tap water of Shiraz City using morphological and molecular methods. Parasitol Res Sep 28. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  7. Armstrong M (2000) The pathogenesis of human Acanthamoeba infections. Infec Dis Rev 2:65–73Google Scholar
  8. Booton GC, Kelly DJ, Chu YW, Seal DV et al (2002) 18S ribosomal DNA typing and tracking of Acanthamoeba species isolates from corneal scrape specimens, contact lenses, lens cases, and home water supplies of Acanthamoeba keratitis patients in Hong Kong. J Clin Microbiol 40:1621–1625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Booton GC, Rogerson A, Bonilla TD et al (2004) Molecular and physiological evaluation of subtropical environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba spp., causal agent of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 51:192–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Booton GC, Visvesvara GS, Byers TJ, Kelly DJ, Fuerst PA (2005) Identification and distribution of Acanthamoeba species genotypes associated with non-keratitis infections. J Clin Microbiol 43:1689–1693CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen EY (1994) The efficiency of Automated DNA sequencing. In: Adam D (ed) Automated DNA sequencing and analysis, 1st edn. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  12. Costa AO, Castro EA, Ferreira GA, Furst C et al (2010) Characterization of Acanthamoeba isolates from dust of a public hospital in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. J Eukaryot Microbiol 57(1):70–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crary MJ (2012) Genetic variability and its relationship to Acanthamoeba pathogenesis. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. https://etd.ohiolink.edu
  14. De Jonckheere JF, Michel R (1988) Species identification and virulence of Acanthamoeba strains from human nasal mucosa. Parasitol Res 74:314–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Derda M, Wojtkowiak-Giera A, Hadaś E (2014) Comparative analyses of different genetic markers for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. isolates. Acta Parasitol 59(3):472–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ebert D (1998) Experimental evolution of parasites. Science 282:1432–1435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Edagawa A, Kimura A, Kawabuchi-Kurata T, Kusuhara Y, Karanis P (2009) Isolation and genotyping of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba and Naegleria species from tap-water sources in Osaka, Japan. Parasitol Res 105:1109–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Farag NS, Gomah AA, Balabel NM (2010) False negative multiplex PCR results with certain groups of antibiotics. Plant Pathol 9(2):73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gatti S, Rama P, Matuska S, Berrilli F et al (2010) Isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba strains from corneal infections in Italy. J Med Microbiol 59:1324–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldschmidt P, Degorge S, Benallaoua D, Batellier L et al (2012) Rapid detection and simultaneous molecular profile characterization of Acanthamoeba infections. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect Dis 74:137–141Google Scholar
  21. Hamadto H, Aufy S, El-Hayawan I, Saleh M, Nagaty I (1993) Study of free-living amoebae in Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 23:631–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassan A, Farouk H, Hassanein F, Abdul-Ghani R, Abdelhady AH (2012) Acanthamoeba contamination of hemodialysis and dental units in Alexandria, Egypt: A neglected potential source of infection. J Infect Public Health 5:304–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Init I, Lau YL, Arin Fadzlun A, Foead AI, Neilson RS, Nissapatorn V (2010) Detection of free living amoebae, Acanthamoeba and Naegleria, in swimming pools, Malaysia. Trop Biomed 27(3):566–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeong HJ, Yu HS (2005) The role of domestic water in Acanthamoeba contamination in contact lens storage cases in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 43:47–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kao PM, Chou MY, Tao CW, Huang WC, Hsu BM, Shen SM, Fan CW, Chiu YC (2013) Diversity and seasonal impact of Acanthamoeba species in a subtropical river shed. BioMed. Research Int (online journal) doi: 10.1155/2013/405794.
  26. Khan NA (2001) Pathogenicity, morphology and differentiation of Acanthamoeba. Curr Microbiol 43:391–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan NA (2003) Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba infections. Microb Pathogen 34:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan NA (2006) Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30:564–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kilic A, Tanyuksel M, Sissons J, Jayasekera S, Khan NA (2004) Isolation of Acanthamoeba isolates belonging to T2, T3, T4, and T7 genotypes from environmental samples in Ankara, Turkey. Acta Parasitol 49:246–252Google Scholar
  30. Kilvington S, Gray T, Dart J, Morlet N, Beeching J, Frazer D, Matheson (2004) Acanthamoeba keratitis: the role of domestic tap water contamination in the United Kingdom. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:165–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kong HH (2009) Molecular Phylogeny of Acanthamoeba. Korean J Parasitol 47:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leck A (2009) Taking a corneal scrape and making a diagnosis. Commun Eye Health J 22(71):42–43Google Scholar
  33. Ledee DR, Hay J, Byers TJ, Seal DV, Kirkness CM (1996) Acanthamoeba griffini: Molecular characterization of a new corneal pathogen. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:544–550Google Scholar
  34. Ledee DR, Iovieno A, Miller D, Mandal N, Diaz M, Fell J, Fini M, Alfonso EC (2009) Molecular Identification of T4 and T5 Genotypes in Isolates from Acanthamoeba Keratitis Patients. J Clin Microbiol 47(5):1458–1462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorenzo-Morales J, Ortega-Rivas A, Martinez E, Foronda P, Valladares B (2005) Isolation and identification of pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains in Tenerife, Canary Island, Spain from water sources. Parasitol Res 95:273–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorenzo-Morales J, Ortega-Rivas A, Martinez E, Khoubbane M, Artigas P et al (2006) Acanthamoeba isolates belonging to T1, T2, T3, T4 and T7 genotypes from environmental freshwater samples in the Nile Delta region, Egypt. Acta Trop 100:63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Maciver SK, Asif M, Simmen MW, Lorenzo-Morales J (2012) A systematic analysis of Acanthamoeba genotype frequency correlated with source and pathogenicity: T4 is confirmed as a pathogen-rich genotype. Eur J Protistol (online journal) doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.11.004.
  38. Magliano AC, da Silva FM, Marta MG, Teixeira MM, Alfieri SC (2009) Genotyping, physiological features and proteolytic activities of a potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from tap water in Brazil. Exp Parasitol 123:231–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Magnet A, Henriques-Gil N, Galván-Diaz AL, Izquiedo F, Fenoy S, del Aguila C (2014) Novel Acanthamoeba 18S rRNA gene sequence type from an environmental isolate. Parasitol Res 113(8):2845–2850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Niszl IA, Veale RB, Markus MB (1998) Cytopathogenicity of clinical and environmental Acanthamoeba isolates for two mammalian cell lines. J Parasitol 84:961–967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Omaña-Molina M, González-Robles A, Salazar-Villatoro LI, Lorenzo-Morales J et al. (2013) Reevaluating the role of Acanthamoeba proteases in tissue invasion: Observation of cytopathogenic mechanisms on MDCK cell monolayers and hamster corneal cells. BioMed. Research Int (online journal).doi: 10.1155/2013/461329.
  42. Ortega-Rivas A, Lorenzo-Morales J, Martinez E, Villa M, Clavel A, Valladares B, del Castillo A (2005) A specific primer pair for the diagnosis and identification of Acanthamoeba astronyxis by random amplified polymorphic DNA– polymerase chain reaction. J Parasitol 91(1):122–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rezaeian M, Niyyati M, Farnia SH, Motevalli Haghi A (2008) Isolation of Acanthamoeba spp. from different environmental sources. Iranian J Parasitol 3(1):44–47Google Scholar
  44. Sadaka H, El-Nassery S, Abou-Samra L, Awadalla H (1994) Isolation and identification of free-living Amoebae from some water sources in Alexandria. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 24(2):247–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schroeder JM, Booton GC, Hay J, Niszl I, Seal DV, Markus MB et al (2001) Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. J Clin Microbiol 39:1903–1911CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Siddiqui R, Khan NA (2012) Biology and Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit Vectors 5(6): 1–13Google Scholar
  47. Tanveer T, Hameed A, Muazzam AG, Jung SY, Gul A, Matin A (2013) Isolation and molecular characterization of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba genotypes from diverse water resources including household drinking water from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Parasitol Res 112:2925–2932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Todd CD, Reyes-Batlle M, Piñero JE, Martínez-Carretero E, Valladares B, Streete D, Lorenzo-Morales J, Lindo JF (2015) Isolation and molecular characterization of Acanthamoeba genotypes in recreational and domestic water sources from Jamaica, West Indies. J Water Health 13(3):909–919. doi: 10.2166/wh.2015.232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gihan Mostafa Tawfeek
    • 1
  • Sawsan Abdel-Hamid Bishara
    • 1
  • Rania Mohammad Sarhan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eman ElShabrawi Taher
    • 2
  • Amira ElSaady Khayyal
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Research Institute of OphthalmologyGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations