Molecular evidence of Sarcocystis species in captive snakes in Japan
- 241 Downloads
Sarcocystis nesbitti, using snakes as the definitive host, is a causative agent of acute human muscular sarcocystosis in Malaysia. Therefore, it is important to explore the distribution and prevalence of S. nesbitti in snakes. Nevertheless, epizootiological information of S. nesbitti in snakes remains insufficient because few surveys have assessed Sarcocystis infection in snakes in endemic countries. In Japan, snakes are popular exotic pet animals that are imported from overseas, but the degree of Sarcocystis infection in them remains unclear. The possibility exists that muscular sarcocystosis by S. nesbitti occurs in contact with captive snakes in non-endemic countries. For a total of 125 snake faecal samples from 67 snake species collected at animal hospitals, pet shops and a zoo, this study investigated the presence of Sarcocystis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the 18S ribosomal RNA gene (18S rDNA). Four (3.2 %) faecal samples were positive by PCR. Phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rDNA sequences obtained from four amplification products revealed one isolate from a beauty snake (Elaphe taeniura), Sarcocystis zuoi, which uses rat snakes as the definitive host. The isolate from a Macklot’s python (Liasis mackloti) was closely related with unidentified Sarcocystis sp. from reticulated pythons in Malaysia. The remaining two isolates from tree boas (Corallus spp.) were closely related with Sarcocystis lacertae, Sarcocystis gallotiae and unidentified Sarcocystis sp. from smooth snakes, Tenerife lizards and European shrews, respectively. This report is the first of a study examining the distribution of Sarcocystis species in captive snakes in Japan.
KeywordsSarcocystis zuoi Captive snakes Molecular identification 18S ribosomal RNA gene
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (26460818) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences (JSPS).
Conflict of interest
- Esposito DH, Stich A, Epelboin L, Malvy D, Han PV, Bottieau E, da Silva A, Zanger P, Slesak G, van Genderen PJJ, Rosenthal BM, Cramer JP, Visser LG, Munoz J, Drew CP, Goldsmith CS, Steiner F, Wagner N, Grobusch MP, Plier DA, Tappe D, Sotir MJ, Brown C, Brunette GW, Fayer R, von Sonnenburg F, Neumayr A, Kozarsky PE, Tioman Island Sarcocystosis Investigation Team (2015) Acute muscular sarcocystosis: an international investigation among ill travelers returning from Tioman Island, Malaysia, 2011–2012. Clin Infect Dis 59:1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Häfner U, Matuschka FR (1984) Life cycle studies on Sarcocystis dirumpens sp. n. with regard to host specificity. Parasitol Res 70:715–720Google Scholar
- Linday DS, Upton SJ, Blagburn BL, Toivio-Kinnucan M, Dubey JP, McAllister CT, Trauth SE (1992) Demonstration that Sarcocystis montanensis has a speckled kingsnake—prairie vole life cycle. J Helminthol Soc Wash 59:9–15Google Scholar
- Matuschka FR, Heydorn AO, Mehlhorn H, Abd-Al-Aal Z, Diesing L, Biehler A (1987) Experimental transmission of Sarcocystis muriviperae n. sp. to laboratory mice by sporocysts from the Palestinian viper (Vipera palaestinae): a light and electron microscope study. Parasitol Res 73:33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morsy K, Bashtar AR, Abdel-Ghaffar F, Mehlhorn H, Al-Quraishy S, Al-Ghamdi A, Koura E, Maher S (2012) Sarcocystis acanthocolubri sp. n. infecting three lizard species of the genus Acanthodactylus and the problem of host specificity. Light and electron microscopic study. Parasitol Res 110:355–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slapeta JR, Modry D, Votypka J, Jirku M, Lukes J, Koudela B (2003) Evolutionary relationships among cyst-forming coccidia Sarcocystis spp. (Alveolata: Apicomplexa: Coccidia) in endemic African tree vipers and perspective for evolution of heteroxenous life cycle. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27:464–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Volf J, Modry D, Koudela B, Slapeta JR (1999) Discovery of the life cycle of Sarcocystis lacertae Babudieri, 1932 (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae), with a species redescription. Folia Parasitol 46:257–262Google Scholar