Ultrastructural characteristics of the caeca of basal polyopisthocotylean monogeneans of the families Chimaericolidae and Hexabothriidae parasitic on cartilaginous fishes
- 136 Downloads
Ultrastructural differences are shown between the caecal organization in three blood-feeding polyopisthocotylean monogeneans, i.e., the chimaericolid Chimaericola leptogaster from the holocephalan Chimaera monstrosa and two hexabothriids, Callorhynchocotyle callorhynchi from the holocephalan Callorhynchus capensis and Rajonchocotyle emarginata from the elasmobranch Amblyraja radiata. In C. leptogaster, digestive cells and connecting syncytium, joined close to the luminal surface by septate junctions, are arranged alternately along the caecal epithelial wall; the nuclear regions of both cell types are sunk below the general level of the caecal epithelium; a concave depression on the apical margin of the digestive cells bears lamellae; and this depression is covered by a lamellate bubble formed by thin projections emanating from the connecting syncytium. The luminal surface of the connecting syncytium is covered with outgrowths terminating in the form of long, narrow processes. In R. emarginata and C. callorhynchi, the predominant digestive cells are at different stages of development and occur in groups, developing digestive cells bulge into the caecal lumen from the connecting syncytium with contact sites present close to the luminal surface, and the luminal surface structures of both the connecting syncytium and the digestive cells are short lamellae. In these two hexabothriids, a holocrine (or apocrine) process for the elimination of digestive product is assumed via the detachment of fully differentiated, bulging digestive cells. Free, apparently sloughed digestive cells and residual bodies are present within the caecal lumen, and replacement digestive cells are numerous in the connecting syncytium. In the chimaericolid, free bubbles containing residual bodies and portions of digestive cells filled with degenerating digestive vesicles occur in the caecal lumen along with large amounts of male and female reproductive material. The usefulness of characteristics of the caecal ultrastructure as taxonomic traits at the family level is discussed.
KeywordsUltrastructure Monogenea Polyopisthocotylea Basal taxa Chimaericola leptogaster Rajonchocotyle emarginata Callorhynchocotyle callorhynchi Caeca Digestive cells Taxonomic trait
The present study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (project No 15-04-02890). The authors would like to thank the staff of the Centre of Electron Microscopy, I.D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, RAS, for technical assistance.
- Euzet L, Combes C (2003) Some controversial questions regarding Monogenea. In: Combes C, Jourdane J (eds) Taxonomy, ecology and evolution of metazoan parasites, vol 1. Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, Perpignan, pp 303–320Google Scholar
- Kearn GC (2004) Leeches, lice and lampreys: a natural history of skin and gill parasites of fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, 432 ppGoogle Scholar
- Poddubnaya LG, Hemmingsen W (2014) Cytoarchitecture of the vitellaria of two monogenean species, parasites of the holocephalan fish, Chimaera monstrosa L, with analysis of vitelline structure in the Neodermata. Parazitologiya 48:257–269 (In Russian)Google Scholar
- Santos СP, Souto-Padrón T, Lanfredi RM (1998) The ultrastructure of the gastrodermis and the nutrition of the cell parasitic Atriaster heterodus Lebedev and Paruchin, 1969 (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 93:277–282. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000200028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith JD, Halton DW (1983) The physiology of trematodes (2nd Edit.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 445Google Scholar
- Watson NF, Whittington ID (1996) Ultrastructure of the gastrodermis and posterior gut pockets of Concinnocotyla australensis (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) and comparison with another polystomatid, Neopolystoma spratti. Folia Parasitol 43:277–289Google Scholar