Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 487–494 | Cite as

Selection, resistance risk assessment, and reversion toward susceptibility of pyriproxyfen in Musca domestica L.

  • Rizwan Mustafa Shah
  • Naeem Abbas
  • Sarfraz Ali Shad
  • Ashfaq Ahmad Sial
Original Paper

Abstract

Pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone mimic, is an effective larvicide against many pests of veterinary and public health importance. Pyriproxyfen is a biorational insecticide having many environmentally friendly attributes that make it compatible with integrated pest management programs. This experiment was performed for the assessment of resistance evolution and reversion toward susceptibility of Musca domestica to pyriproxyfen. Repeated selection at successive generations resulted in 5.09- and 130-fold increase in lethal concentration 50 (LC50) compared to field and susceptible strain, respectively. A significant decline after 22 generations without selection suggesting resistance to pyriproxyfen was unstable in M. domestica. Realized heritability (h 2) of resistance to pyriproxyfen was 0.035 in pyriproxyfen-selected strain of M. domestica. The projected rate of resistance development indicated that, if slope = 1.28 and h 2 = 0.035, then 46–21 generations are required for 10-fold increase in LC50 at 50–90 % selection intensity. These findings suggest that a risk for resistance development to pyriproxyfen occurred in M. domestica under continuous selection pressure. Pyriproxyfen susceptibility reversed when its application is ceased for a specified duration.

Keywords

House fly Pyriproxyfen Resistance Heritability Stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly thankful to Rachel Lehrer, strategist at Continuum Innovation, 1220 Washington St. West Newton, MA 02465, for critical review of manuscript to improve English language.

References

  1. Abbas N, Khan HAA, Shad SA (2014a) Cross-resistance, genetics, and realized heritability of resistance to fipronil in the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): a potential vector for disease transmission. Parasitol Res 113:1343–1352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbas N, Khan HAA, Shad SA (2014b) Resistance of the house fly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to lambda-cyhalothrin: mode of inheritance, realized heritability, and cross-resistance to other insecticides. Ecotoxicology 23:791–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acevedo GR, Zapater M, Toloza AC (2009) Insecticide resistance of house fly, Musca domestica (L.) from Argentina. Parasitol Res 105:489–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell HA, Robinson KA, Weaver RJ (2010) First report of cyromazine resistance in a population of UK house fly (Musca domestica) associated with intensive livestock production. Pest Manag Sci 66:693–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrière Y (2003) Haplodiploidy, sex, and the evolution of pesticide resistance. J Econ Entomol 96:1626–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cetin H, Erler F, Yanikoglu A (2006) Larvicidal activity of novaluron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, against the housefly, Musca domestica. J Insect Sci 6:50PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson JS (2004) Development and stability of insecticide resistance in the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to cyromazine, abamectin, and spinosad. J Econ Entomol 97:112–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finney D (1971) A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London, p 333Google Scholar
  10. Firkoi MJ, Hayes JL (1990) Quantitative genetic tools for insecticide resistance risk assessment: estimating the heritability of resistance. J Econ Entomol 83:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Förster M, Klimpel S, Mehlhorn H, Sievert K, Messler S, Pfeffer K (2007) Pilot study on synanthropic flies (e.g. Musca, Sarcophaga, Calliphora, Fannia, Lucilia, Stomoxys) as vectors of pathogenic microorganisms. Parasitol Res 101:243–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geden CJ, Devine GJ (2012) Pyriproxyfen and house flies (Diptera: Muscidae): effects of direct exposure and autodissemination to larval habitats. J Med Entomol 49:606–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Højland DH, Scott JG, Jensen K-MV, Kristensen M (2013) Autosomal male determination in a spinosad-resistant housefly strain from Denmark. Pest Manag Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.3655 Google Scholar
  14. Invest J, Lucas J (2008) Pyriproxyfen as a mosquito larvicide. Sixth International Conference on Urban Pests, VeszprémGoogle Scholar
  15. Jutsum AR, Heaney SP, Perrin BM, Wege PJ (1998) Pesticide resistance: assessment of risk and the development and implementation of effective management strategies. Pestic Sci 54:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman PE, Scott JG, Rutz DA (2001) Monitoring insecticide resistance in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from New York dairies. Pest Manag Sci 57:514–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufman PE, Nunez SC, Geden CJ, Scharf ME (2010a) Selection for resistance to imidacloprid in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J Econ Entomol 103:1937–1942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufman PE, Nunez SC, Mann RS, Geden CJ, Scharf ME (2010b) Nicotinoid and pyrethroid insecticide resistance in houseflies (Diptera: Muscidae) collected from Florida dairies. Pest Manag Sci 66:290–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan HAA, Shad SA, Akram W (2012) Effect of livestock manures on the fitness of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitol Res 111:1165–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan HAA, Shad SA, Akram W (2013) Resistance to new chemical insecticides in the house fly, Musca domestica L., from dairies in Punjab, Pakistan. Parasitol Res 112:2049–2054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan H, Abbas N, Shad SA, Afzal MBS (2014a) Genetics and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in a poultry population of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) from Pakistan. Pestic Biochem Physiol 114:38–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan HAA, Akram W, Shad SA (2014b) Genetics, cross-resistance and mechanism of resistance to spinosad in a field strain of Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Acta Trop 130:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristensen M, Jespersen JB (2003) Larvicide resistance in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) populations in Denmark and establishment of resistant laboratory strains. J Econ Entomol 96:1300–1306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S (2013) Housefly (Musca domestica L.) control potential of Cymbopogon citratus Stapf. (Poales: Poaceae) essential oil and monoterpenes (citral and 1, 8-cineole). Parasitol Res 112:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lai T, Su J (2011) Assessment of resistance risk in Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to chlorantraniliprole. Pest Manag Sci 67:1468–1472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mojaver M, Bandani A (2010) Effects of the insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen on immature stages of sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae). Munis Entomol Zool 5:187–197Google Scholar
  27. Moon R, Hinton J, O’Rourke S, Schmidt D (2001) Nutritional value of fresh and composted poultry manure for house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) larvae. J Econ Entomol 94:1308–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pu X, Yang Y, Wu S, Wu Y (2010) Characterisation of abamectin resistance in a field-evolved multiresistant population of Plutella xylostella. Pest Manag Sci 66:371–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenheim J (1991) Realized heritability estimation for pesticide resistance traits. Entomol Exp Appl 58:93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roush RT, Croft B (1986) Experimental population genetics and ecological studies of pesticide resistance in insects and mites. In: Pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, pp 257–270Google Scholar
  32. Scott J, Roush R, Liu N (1991) Selection of high-level abamectin resistance from field-collected house flies, Musca domestica. Experientia 47:288–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott JG, Alefantis TG, Kaufman PE, Rutz DA (2000) Insecticide resistance in house flies from caged-layer poultry facilities. Pest Manag Sci 56:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seng CM, Setha T, Nealon J, Socheat D, Nathan MB (2008) Six months of Aedes aegypti control with a novel controlled-release formulation of pyriproxyfen in domestic water storage containers in Cambodia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 39:822–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shi J, Zhang L, Gao X (2011) Characterisation of spinosad resistance in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Pest Manag Sci 67:335–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shono T, Zhang L, Scott JG (2004) Indoxacarb resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica. Pestic Biochem Physiol 80:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sial AA, Brunner JF (2010) Assessment of resistance risk in obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to the reduced-risk insecticides chlorantraniliprole and spinetoram. J Econ Entomol 103:1378–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sial AA, Brunner JF (2012) Selection for resistance, reversion towards susceptibility and synergism of chlorantraniliprole and spinetoram in obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Pest Manag Sci 68:462–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slansky F, Scriber J (1985) Food consumption and utilization. Compr Insect Physiol, Biochem Pharmacol 4:87–163Google Scholar
  40. Tabashnik BE (1992) Resistance risk assessment: realized heritability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 85:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tabashnik BE, McGaughey WH (1994) Resistance risk assessment for single and multiple insecticides: responses of Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis. J Econ Entomol 87:834–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanaka Y, Noppun V (1989) Heritability estimates of phenthoate resistance in the diamond-back moth. Entomol Exp Appl 52:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tang JD, Caprio MA, Sheppard DC, Gaydon DM (2002) Genetics and fitness costs of cyromazine resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J Econ Entomol 95:1251–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson TG (2004) The molecular site of action of juvenile hormone and juvenile hormone insecticides during metamorphosis: how these compounds kill insects. J Insect Physiol 50:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson M, Moshitzky P, Laor E, Ghanim M, Rami Horowitz A, Morin S (2007) Reversal of resistance to pyriproxyfen in the Q biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manag Sci 63:761–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang L, Shi J, Gao X (2008) Inheritance of beta-cypermethrin resistance in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Pest Manag Sci 64:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and TechnologyBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations