Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 113, Issue 9, pp 3495–3500 | Cite as

An identification key for the five most common species of Metastrongylus

  • Diana GassóEmail author
  • Luca Rossi
  • Gregorio Mentaberre
  • Encarna Casas
  • Roser Velarde
  • Pawel Nosal
  • Emmanuel Serrano
  • Joaquim Segales
  • Pedro Fernandez-Llario
  • Carles Feliu
Short Communication

Abstract

Species of the Metastrongylus genus, the lung nematodes of pigs that require an intermediate host (earthworm) to complete their cycle, pose a potential risk to both livestock and humans. This parasite which can result in lung pathology and mixed infections with other pathogens (e.g. viruses) can be fatal to pigs. Although this genus is distributed worldwide, there are no classification keys for identifying this common parasite species. In this work, we take advantage of parasitological surveys of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in northern and central Spain and southern Poland to develop a morphological identification key for the five most common Metastrongylus species (Metastrongylus apri, Metastrongylus pudendotectus, Metastrongylus salmi, Metastrongylus confusus and Metastrongylus asymetricus). In addition, we provide the first record of M. confusus in Spain, probably unidentified until now due to the lack of appropriate identification keys. We hope that this user-friendly identification key will enable parasitologists and veterinary practitioners to avoid further misclassifications of Metastrongylus species.

Keywords

Lung worms Metastrongylus confusus Metastrongylus apri Metastrongylus elongatus Metastrongylus pudendotectus Metastrongylus asymetricus Wild boar 

Notes

Acknowledgments

D.G. is grateful to M.H. Pongiluppi for the plate design. E. Serrano was supported by the postdoctoral programme (SFRH/BPD/96637/2013) of the Fundação para a Ciência ea Tecnologia, Portugal.

References

  1. Acevedo P, Quirós-Fernández F, Casal J, Vicente J (2014) Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecol Indic 36:594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adedokun OA, Adejinmi JO, Ukoikpoko GB (2001) Effect of husbandry system on the incidence of lungworm (Metastrongylus spp) in pigs in Ibadan, Nigeria. Trop Vet 19:175–177Google Scholar
  3. Alcaide M, Frontera E, Rodríguez MJ, Sáez IE, Domínguez-Alpízar JL, Reina D, Navarrete I (2005) Parasitosis pulmonares del cerdo ibérico Situación actual de la metastrongilosis en España. Mundo Ganadero 176:40–44Google Scholar
  4. Boitani L, Mattei L (1992) Aging wild boar Sus scrofa by tooth eruption. Spitz F, AL (ED) Ongules/Ungulates 91; Int Symp Toulouse, Fr Sept 2-6, 1991 XII + 661P Soc Fr Pour l’etude La Prot Des Mammiferes Paris, Fr Inst Rech Sur Les Gd Mammiferes Toulou 419–421Google Scholar
  5. Carstensen L, Vaarst M, Roepstorff A (2002) Helminth infections in Danish organic swine herds. Vet Parasitol 106:253–264. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00080-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conole JC, Chilton NB, Järvis T, Gasser RB (1999) Intraspecific and interspecific variation in the second internal transcribed spacer sequence for Metastrongylus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) detected by high resolution PCR-linked restriction fragment length polymorphism. Int J Parasitol 29:1935–1940. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00149-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Da Silva D, Müller G (2013) Parasites of the respiratory tract of Sus scrofa scrofa (wild boar) from commercial breeder in southern Brazil and its relationship with Ascaris suum. Parasitol Res 112:1353–1356. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3214-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forrester DJ, Porter JH, Belden RC, Frankenberger WB (1982) Lungworms of feral swine in Florida. J Am Vet Med Assoc 181:1278–1280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. García-González ÁM, Pérez-Martín JE, Gamito-Santos JA et al (2013) Epidemiologic study of lung parasites (Metastrongylus spp.) in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in southwestern Spain. J Wildl Dis 49:157–162. doi: 10.7589/2011-07-217 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heise-Pavlov PM, Heise-Pavlov SR (2003) Feral pigs in tropical lowland rainforest of northeastern Australia: ecology, zoonoses and management. Wildl Biol 9:21–27Google Scholar
  11. Holló F (1965) Investigations on Metastrongylosis in swine 2. Some remarks to morphology of Metastrongylus salmi (Gedoelst 1923) with special reference to its differentiation from M. apri. Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung 15:259–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Humbert JF (1992) Etude histo-pathologique de la relation hotes-parasite: le modele lombric, sanglier-metastrongles. Rev Sci Tech 11:1063–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Humbert JF, Drouet J (1990) Enquête épidémiologique sur la métastrongylose du sanglier (Sus scrofa) en France. Gibier Faune Sauvag 7:67–84Google Scholar
  14. Jansen J Jr (1964) On the lungworms of the wild boar Sus scrofa L. in the Netherlands, with a description of Metastrongylus confusus n. sp. Tijdschr Diergeneeskde 89(17):1205–1211Google Scholar
  15. Järvis T, Kapel C, Moks E et al (2007) Helminths of wild boar in the isolated population close to the northern border of its habitat area. Vet Parasitol 150:366–369. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.09.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khrustalev AV (1981) Species composition of the genus Metastrongylus a lung parasite of pigs and wild boars in the USSR. Parazitol (St Petersburg) 15:420–423Google Scholar
  17. Leignel V, Humbert JF, Elard L (1997) Study by ribosomal DNA ITS 2 sequencing and RAPD analysis on the systematics of four Metastrongylus species (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea). J Parasitol 83:606. doi: 10.2307/3284232 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marruchella G, Paoletti B, Speranza R, Di Guardo G (2012) Fatal bronchopneumonia in a Metastrongylus elongatus and Porcine circovirus type 2 co-infected pig. Res Vet Sci 93:310–312. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morita T, Haruta K, Shibata-Haruta A et al (2007) Lung worms of wild boars in the western region of Tokyo, Japan. J Vet Med Sci 69:417–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moyle W, Purdy E (2012) Nematode-induced low-grade chronic inflammation of the iris. Optom Vis Sci 89:E939–E943. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318255d897 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagy G, Varga G, Csivincsik A, Sugar L (2013) Occurrence of Metastrongylus asymmetricus (Noda, 1973) in Hungary. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 135:308–312Google Scholar
  22. Noda R (1973) A new species of Metastrongylus nematode from wild boar with remarks on other species. Bull Univ Osaka Prefect Ser B Agric Life Sci 25:21–29Google Scholar
  23. Nosal P, Kowal J, Nowosad B (2010) Structure of Metastrongylidae in wild boars from southern Poland. Helminthologia 47:212–218. doi: 10.2478/s11687-010-0033-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pence DB, Warren RJ, Ford CR (1988) Visceral helminth communities of an insular population of feral swine. J Wildl Dis 24:105–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rajkovi BR, Bosnia S, Rimac D, Evi PD (2002) Prevalence of helminths in wild boar from hunting grounds in eastern Croatia. 48:261–270Google Scholar
  26. Sato H, Suzuki K, Yokoyama M (2008) Visceral helminths of wild boars (Sus scrofa leucomystax) in Japan, with special reference to a new species of the genus Morgascaridia Inglis, 1958 (Nematoda: Schneidernematidae). J Helminthol 82:159–168. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X08936191 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Senlik B, Cirak VY, Girisgin O, Akyol CV (2011) Helminth infections of wild boars (Sus scrofa) in the Bursa province of Turkey. J Helminthol 85:404–408. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1000074X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Mobedi I, Rezaian M et al (2003) Helminth parasites of the wild boar, Sus scrofa, in Luristan province, western Iran and their public health significance. J Helminthol 77:263–267. doi: 10.1079/JOH2003168 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Takacs A (1996) Data on the endoparasitic infection of wildboar (Sus-s-scrofa L) in Hungary. Magyer Allatorvosok Lapja 51:721–724Google Scholar
  30. Vanparijs O, Thienpont D (1982) The earthworm Eisenia foetida as intermediate host for artificial infection of pigs with Metastrongylus apri and treatment with flubendazole. Parasitology 84:R–45Google Scholar
  31. Yoshihara S (2004) Lesions in the liver of guinea-pigs infected with the swine lungworm, Metastrongylus apri. J Helminthol 78:285–286. doi: 10.1079/JOH2004234 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Gassó
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luca Rossi
    • 2
  • Gregorio Mentaberre
    • 1
  • Encarna Casas
    • 1
  • Roser Velarde
    • 1
  • Pawel Nosal
    • 3
  • Emmanuel Serrano
    • 1
    • 4
  • Joaquim Segales
    • 5
    • 6
  • Pedro Fernandez-Llario
    • 7
  • Carles Feliu
    • 8
  1. 1.Servei d’Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de VeterinàriaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Dipartimento de Produzioni Animali, Epidemiologia ed EcologiaUniverstità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  3. 3.Departament of Zoology and EcologyUniversity of Agriculture in KrakowKrakówPoland
  4. 4.CESAM, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal
  5. 5.Departament de Sanitat i d’Anatomia Animals, Facultat de VeterinàriaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)BarcelonaSpain
  6. 6.Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CreSA), Departament de Sanitat i d’Anatomia Animals, Facultat de VeterinàriaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  7. 7.Cátedra de Biología y Etología, Facultad de VeterinariaUniversidad de ExtremaduraCáceresSpain
  8. 8.Department de Microbiologia i Parasitologia, Facultat de FarmàciaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations