Isolation and characterization of the nematophagous fungus Arthrobotrys conoides
- 631 Downloads
The spread of organic farming and the development of resistance to anthelmintics by parasites, especially in small ruminants, have necessitated the search for alternative methods of nematode control. Biological control using nematophagous fungi is one option; however, few studies have been conducted with native strains. The present study was divided into two phases. In the first phase, we aimed to isolate, identify, and assess the in vitro predatory activity of nematophagous fungi that had been isolated on Trichostrongylidae third-instar larvae. In the second phase, the isolate with superior predatory activity in vitro was molecularly characterized, and its morphological plasticity was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on Haemonchus third-instar larvae. Of the 56 soil samples from different regions of Paraná State, Brazil, 57 fungal strains were recovered, of which four exhibited predatory activity. Two pure isolates were obtained: the CED and LIN strains. After demonstrating 96.35 % predatory activity for the CED strain, this strain was selected and characterized using molecular criteria by sequencing the rDNA internal transcribed spacer and was identified as Arthrobotrys conoides (GenBank ID: JN191309). Morphological patterns in this strain during the interaction between the fungus and the nematode were revealed by SEM, in which two extensions of the infection bulb that was used to pierce the nematode's cuticle were clearly visible.
KeywordsPredatory Activity Potato Dextrose Agar Medium Morphological Plasticity Nematophagous Fungus Accession Number JN191309
- Araújo JV, Santos MA, Ferraz S, Maia AS (1994) Biological control “in vitro” of infective Haemonchus placei larvae by predacious fungi Arthrobotrys musiformis. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoot 46:197–204Google Scholar
- Araújo JV, Campos AK, Paiva F, Vieira-Bressan MCR (2001) Efeito antagonista de fungos predadores do gênero Arthrobotrys sobre larvas infectantes de Oesophagosthomum radiatum, Cooperia punctata e Haemonchus placei. (Antagonistic effect of fungal predators from the Arthrobotrys genus on infective larvae of Oesophagosthomum radiatum, Cooperia punctata and Haemonchus placei.). Rev Bras Cienc Vet 8:81–84Google Scholar
- Braga FR, Silva AR, Carvalho RO, Araújo JV, Guimarães PGC, Fujiwara RT, Frassy LN (2010) In vitro predatory activity of the fungi Duddingtonia flagrans, Monacrosporium thaumasium, Monacrosporium sinense, Arthrobotrys robusta on Ancylostoma celanicum, third-stage larvae. Vet Microbiol 146:183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dalla Pria M, Ferraz S, Muchovej JJ (1991) Isolamento e identificação de fungos nematófagos de amostras de solo de diversas regiões do Brasil. (Isolation and identification of nematophagous fungi in soil samples from different regions of Brazil). Nematol Bras 19:170–177Google Scholar
- Dupponois R, Amadou MB, Matteile T (1998) Effect of some rhizospher bacteria for the biocontrol of nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne with Arthrobotrys oligospora. Fund Appl Nematol 2:157–163Google Scholar
- Gerrits Van Den Ende AHG, Hoog GS (1999) Variability and molecular diagnostics of the neurotropic species Cladophialophora bantiana. Stud Mycol 43:151–162Google Scholar
- Graminha EBN, Maia AS, Santos JM, Candido RC, Silva GS, Costa AJ (2001) Avaliação in vitro da patogenicidade de fungos predadores de nematóides parasitos de animais domesticos (In vitro assessment of pathogenicity of predatory fungi on parasitic nematodes of domestic animals). Sem Cienc Agr 22:11–16Google Scholar
- Iapar (2009) Sistema de monitoramento agroclimático do Paraná. (Agro-climatic monitoring system of Paraná). Availableat: http://www.iapar.br/arquivos/Image/monitoramento/Medias_Historicas/Guarapuava.ht. Accessed on 08/10/2010.
- Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, New York, pp 21–132Google Scholar
- Larsen M (2006) Biological control of nematodes parasites in sheep. J An Sci 84:133–139Google Scholar
- Maak R (1968) Geografia física do Estado do Paraná. Curitiba: Banco de Desenvolvimento do Estado do Paraná (Physical Geography of Paraná State). Development Bank of Paraná State, Curitiba, p 350Google Scholar
- Naves RL, Campos VP (1991) Ocorrência de fungos predadores de nematóides no sul de Minas Gerais e estudo da capacidade predatória e crescimento in vitro de alguns de seus isolados. (Presence of predatory fungi on nematodes in southern Minas Gerais state and the predatory capacity and in vitro growth of their isolates.). Nematol Bras 15:153–162Google Scholar
- Nordbring-Hertz B (1983) Dialysis membrane technique for studying microbial interaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:399–407Google Scholar
- Nordbring-Hertz B, Friman E, Veenhuis M (1989) Hyphal fusion during initial stage of trap formation in Arthrobotrys oligospora. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 55:237–244Google Scholar
- Nordbring-Hertz B, Jansson HB, Tundlid, A (2002) Nematophagous fungi. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Macmillian Publishing Group/www.els.net. pp. 681–690.
- Oliveira RDL, Ferraz S, Alfenas AC, Dias-Arieira CR (2002) Caracterização morfológica e isoenzimática de espécies de Arthrobotrys ocorrentes no Brasil. (Morphological and isoenzyme characterization of Arthrobotrys species in Brazil). Nematol Bras 26:181–197Google Scholar
- Philip J (2002) Nematophagous fungi: Guide by Philip Jacobs, BRIC-Version online. Accessed on: June/2008. Available at www.biological-research.com/.
- Roberts FHS, O'Sullivan PJ (1950) Methods for egg counts and larval cultures for strongyles infecting tract of cattle. Austr J Agr 1:6–7Google Scholar
- Santos MA, Ferraz S, Muchovej J (1991) Detection and ecology of nematophagous fungi from Brazilian soils. Nematol Bras 15:121–134Google Scholar
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar