Parasitology Research

, Volume 111, Issue 5, pp 2165–2172 | Cite as

Molecular study on three morphotypes of Demodex mites (Acarina: Demodicidae) from dogs

  • Manuel de Rojas
  • Cristina Riazzo
  • Rocío Callejón
  • Diego Guevara
  • Cristina Cutillas
Original Paper

Abstract

Canine demodicosis is a severe and highly prevalent dermatologic disease in dogs. Pet dogs can be affected by three recognized Demodex species that can produce clinical effects. In this paper, three morphological types of Demodex mites have been isolated from Spanish dogs. A complete morphobiometrical study of each one has been carried out. Morphological and biometrical studies revealed three closely related populations with some distinctive characteristics and could be identified as Demodex canis, Demodex injai, and Demodex sp. “cornei.” Furthermore, one population of D. canis from China, different populations of Demodex folliculorum from human skin (Spain and China), D. folliculorum from human eyelashes (Spain), and Demodex brevis from human skin (China) were considered to find out the level of variation between different species and geographical origin. The aim of the present study is to assess the usefulness of mitochondrial DNA molecular markers in establishing phylogenetic relationships and resolve taxonomic questions in Demodex mites. Molecular studies based on the amplification and sequencing of the 16S rDNA and cytochrome oxidase I mitochondrial genes did not show clear differences between the three morphotypes considered. Furthermore, phylogenetic relationships in Demodex mites were analyzed. The resulting phylogenetic trees show that Demodex species from dogs were gathered together, and populations of D. folliculorum from humans appear together in a different branch; however, D. brevis from humans seemed to be more distant. Our results show that cytochrome oxidase I region is a useful tool to solve different taxonomic questions at the species and population level and to infer phylogenetic relationships in Demodex species. However, 16S mitochondrial rDNA seems a good marker for comparisons at an interspecies level, but not at a population level in this group of mites. Furthermore, from genetic distance and divergence data, we would suggest that D. canis, D. injai, and Demodex sp. cornei are polymorphisms of the same species.

References

  1. Chesney CJ (1999) Short form of Demodex species mite in the dog: occurrence and measurements. J Small Anim Pract 40:58–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chilton NB, Gasser RB, Beveridge I (1995) Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of morphologically indistinguishable species within the Hypodontus macropi complex (Nematoda: Strongyloidea). Int J Parasitol 25:647–651Google Scholar
  3. de Rojas M, Mora MD, Ubeda JM, Cutillas C, Navajas M, Guevara DC (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in rhinonyssid mites (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Exp Appl Acarol 25:957–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Rojas M, Mora MD, Ubeda JM, Cutillas C, Navajas M, Guevara DC (2002) Phylogenetic relationships in rhinonyssid mites (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) based on ribosomal DNA sequences: insights for the discrimination of closely related species. Parasitol Res 88(7):675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Rojas M, Riazzo C, Callejón R, Guevara D, Cutillas C (2012) Morphobiometrical and molecular study of two populations of Demodex folliculorum from humans. Parasitol Res 110(1):227–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desch CE, Hillier A (2003) Demodex injai: a new species of hair follicle mite (Acari: Demodicidae) from the domestic dog (Canidae). Entomol Soc Am 40(2):146–149Google Scholar
  7. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herbert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003a) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B (Suppl) 270:S96–S99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003b) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond 270:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillier A, Desch CE (2002) Large bodied Demodex mite infestation in 4 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 220:623–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar S, Nei M, Dusley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9:299–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mangold AJ, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S (1998) Mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences and phylogenetic relationships of species of Rhipicephalus and other tick genera among Metrastiata (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 84(6):478–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mueller RS, Bettney SV (1999) An unusual presentation of canine demodicosis caused by a long-bodied Demodex mite in a Lakeland Terrier. Aust Vet Pract 29:128–130Google Scholar
  14. Navajas M, Gutierrez J, Bonato HR, Mapangou-Divassa S (1994) Intraspecific diversity of the Cassava green mite Mononychellus progresivus (Acari: Tetranychidae) using comparisons of mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences and cross-breeding. Exp Appl Acarol 18(6):651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Navajas M, Gutierrez J, Gotoh T (1997) Convergence of molecular and morphological data reveals phylogenetic information on Tetranychus species and allows the restoration of the genus Amphitetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Bull Entomol Res 87:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Navajas M, Lagnel J, Gutierrez J, Boursot P (1998) Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism. Heredity 80:742–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Navajas M, Fenton B (2000) The application of molecular markers in the study of diversity in acarology: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 24:751–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ravera I, Altet L, Francino O, Bardagí M, Sánchez A, Ferrer L (2011) Development of a real-time PCR to detect Demodex canis DNA in different tissue samples. Parasitol Res 108:305–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rejas López J, Díez Reyero R, Díez Baños N (2011) First report of canine demodicosis by short-bodied Demodex mite (Acari: Demodicidae) in Spain. Rev Ibero-Latinoam Parasitol 70(2):219–224Google Scholar
  20. Saitou N, Nei N (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Saridomichelakis MA, Koutinas E, Papadogiannakis M, Papazachariadou M, Llapitrakas D (1999) Adult-onset demodicosis in two dogs due to Demodex canis and a short-tailed demodectic mite. J Small Anim Pract 40:529–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott DW, Miller WM, Griffin CE (2001) Parasitic skin diseases. In: Scott DW, Miller WM, Griffin CE (eds) Muller and Kirk's small animal dermatology, 6th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 423–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shipstone M (2000) Generalised demodicosis in dogs clinical perspective. Aus Vet J 78:240–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach AT, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701Google Scholar
  25. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731–2739Google Scholar
  26. Tamura Y, Kawamura Y, Inoue I, Ishino S (2001) Scanning electron microscopy description of a new species of Demodex canis spp. Vet Dermatol 12:275–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc Ac Res 22:4673–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toops E, Blagburn B, Lenaghan S, Kennis R, MacDonald J, Christine D (2010) Extraction and characterization of DNA from Demodex canis. J Appl Res Vet Med 8:31–43Google Scholar
  29. Zhao YE, Xu JR, Hu L, Wu LP, Wang ZH (2012) Complete sequence analysis of 18S rDNA based on genomic DNA extraction from individual Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae). Exp Parasitol 131(1):45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao YE, Wu LP (2012) Phylogenetic relationships in Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA partial sequences. Parasitol Res. doi:10.1007/s00436-012-2941-7

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel de Rojas
    • 1
  • Cristina Riazzo
    • 1
  • Rocío Callejón
    • 1
  • Diego Guevara
    • 1
  • Cristina Cutillas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations