Parasitology Research

, Volume 111, Issue 3, pp 1379–1383

Using the AD12-ICT rapid-format test to detect Wuchereria bancrofti circulating antigens in comparison to Og4C3-ELISA and nucleopore membrane filtration and microscopy techniques

  • Amal Abdul-Rasheed El-Moamly
  • Mohamed Aly El-Sweify
  • Mohamad Abdul Hafez
Short Communication


Lymphatic filariasis (LF) continues to be a major source of permanent disability and an impediment to socio-economic development in 73 countries where more than 1 billion people are at risk and over 120 millions are infected. The global drive to eliminate LF necessitates an increasing demand for valid, reliable and rapid diagnostic tests. This study aimed to assess the performance of the AD12 rapid format immunochromatographic test (ICT) to detect Wuchereria bancrofti circulating antigens, against the combined gold standard: TropBio Og4C3-ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) which detects circulating filarial antigen (CFA) and the nucleopore membrane filtration and microscopic examination. This prospective case-control study involved 647 asymptomatic migrant workers from filariasis-endemic countries. Of these specimens, 32 were positive for microfilaremia using the membrane filtration and microscopy, 142 positive by ELISA (of which 32 had microfilaremia), and 128 positive by the ICT (of which 31 had microfilaremia). The performance of the ICT was calculated against 32 true-positive and 90 true-negative cases. For the detection of CFA, the ICT had a sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91–103), specificity 100% (95% CI 100–100), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 100% (95% CI 100–100), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 99% (95% CI 97–101); and the total accuracy of the test was 99% (95% CI 98–101). The agreement between ICT and ELISA in detecting W. bancrofti antigens was excellent (kappa = 0.934; p = 0.000). In conclusion, the AD12-ICT test for the detection of W. bancrofti-CFA was sensitive and specific and comparable to the performance of ELISA. The ICT would be a useful additional test to facilitate the proposed strategies for control and elimination of LF. Because it is rapid, simple to perform, and does not require the use of special equipment, the ICT may be most appropriate in screening programs and in monitoring the possible risk of introducing the disease to the non-endemic countries.


  1. Alvar J, Yactayo S, Bern C (2006) Leishmaniasis and poverty. Trends Parasitol 22:552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braga C, Dourado MI, Ximenes RA, Alves L, Brayner F, Rocha A, Alexander N (2003) Field evaluation of the whole blood immunochromatographic test for rapid bancroftian filariasis diagnosis in the northeast of Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 45:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandrasena TG, Premaratna R, Abeyewickrema W, de Silva NR (2002) Evaluation of the ICT whole-blood antigen card test to detect infection due to Wuchereria bancrofti in Sri Lanka. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96:60–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conteh L, Engels T, Molyneux DH (2010) Socioeconomic aspects of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet 375:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyer G, Pimentel A, Medeiros Z, Béliz F, Galdino E, Moura E, Coutinho A, Andrade LD, Rocha A, Silva LM, Piessens WF (1996) Studies on the periodicity and intravascular distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae in paired samples of capillary and venous blood from Recife, Brazil. Trop Med Int Health 1:264–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer P, Xiaole L, Lizotte-Waniewski M, Kamal IH, Ramzy R, Williams SA (1999) Development of quantitative, competitive polymerase chain reaction–enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA. Parasitol Res 85:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hotez PJ, Molyneux DH, Fenwick A, Kumaresan J, Sachs SE, Sachs JD, Savioli L (2007) Control of neglected tropical diseases. N Engl J Med 357:1018–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A, Savioli L, Molyneux DH (2009) Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet 373:1570–1575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iqbal J, Sher A (2006) Determination of the prevalence of lymphatic filariasis among migrant workers in Kuwait by detecting circulating filarial antigen. J med microbial 55:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lammie P, Weil G, Rahmah N, Kaliraj P, Steel C, Goodman D, Lakshmikanthan V, Ottesen E (2004) Recombinant antigen based assays for the diagnosis and surveillance of lymphatic filariasis — a multicenter trial. Filaria J 3:9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCarthy J (2000) Diagnosis of lymphatic filarial infection. In: Nutman TB (ed) Lymphatic filariasis. Imperial College Press, London, pp 127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Molyneux D (2003) Lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis) elimination: a public health success and development opportunity. Filaria J 2:13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Omar MS, Sheikha AK, Al-Amari OM, Abdalla SE, Musa RA (2000) Field evaluation of two diagnostic antigen tests for Wuchereria bancrofti infection among Indian expatriates in Saudi Arabia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 31:415–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ottesen EA (2002) Major progress toward eliminating lymphatic filariasis. N Engl J Med 347:1885–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palumbo E (2008) Filariasis: diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Acta Biomed 79:106–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pani SP, Hoti SL, Elango A, Yuvaraj J, Lall R, Ramaiah KD (2000) Evaluation of the ICT whole blood antigen card test to detect infection due to nocturnally periodic Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Trop Med Int Health 5(5):359–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phantana S, Sensathein S, Songtrus J, Klagrathoke S, Ohongnin K (1999) ICT filariasis test: a new screening test for Bancroftian filariasis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 30(10):47–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramzy RM, Helmy H, el-Lethy AS, Kandil AM, Ahmed ES, Weil GJ, Faris R (1999) Field evaluation of a rapid–format kit for the diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 5(5):880–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Reddy GS, Das LK, Pani SP (2004) The preferential site of adult Wuchereria bancrofti: an ultrasound study of male asymptomatic microfilaria carriers in Pondicherry, India. Natl Med J India 17:195–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rocha A, Braga C, Belem M, Carrera A, Aguiar-Santos A, Oliveira P, Texeira MJ, Furtado A (2009) Comparison of tests for the detection of circulating filarial antigen (Og4C3-ELISA and AD12-ICT) and ultrasound in diagnosis of lymphatic filariasis in individuals with microfilariae. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104(4):621–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simonsen PE, Dunyo SK (1999) Comparative evaluation of three new tools for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis based on detection of specific circulating antigens. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 93(3):278–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strosberg AM, Barrio K, Stinger VH, Tashker J, Wilbur JC, Wilson L, Woo K (2007) In: Chagas disease: a Latin American nemesis. Institute of One World Health, San Francisco, CA, pp 1–96Google Scholar
  23. Weerasooriya MV, Itoh M, Mudalige MP, Qiu XG, Kimura E, Gunawardena NK, Fujimaki Y (2003) Human infection with Wuchereria bancrofti in Matara, Sri Lanka: the use in parallel, of an ELISA to detect filarial-specific IgG4 in urine and of ICT card tests to detect filarial antigen in whole blood. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 97:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weil GJ, Lammie PJ, Weiss N (1997) The ICT filariasis test: a rapid-format antigen test for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Parasitol Today 13:401–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. World Health Organization (1999) Can lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis be eliminated together? TDR News No. 60, Filarial Update 1(2)Google Scholar
  26. World Health Organization (2005) Global program to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 80:202–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amal Abdul-Rasheed El-Moamly
    • 1
  • Mohamed Aly El-Sweify
    • 2
  • Mohamad Abdul Hafez
    • 3
  1. 1.Parasitology Department, Faculty of MedicineSuez Canal UniversityIsmailiaEgypt
  2. 2.Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of MedicineSuez Canal UniversityIsmailiaEgypt
  3. 3.Pathology Department, Faculty of MedicineKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations