Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 423–432 | Cite as

The effect of sublethal exposure to temephos and propoxur on reproductive fitness and its influence on circadian rhythms of pupation and adult emergence in Anopheles stephensi Liston—a malaria vector

  • Deepak Sanil
  • Nadikere Jaya Shetty
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of organophosphate and carbamate insecticides namely, temephos and propoxur respectively, on the life history of Anopheles stephensi Liston (Culicidae) under laboratory conditions. The late third instar larvae of the mosquito were exposed to sublethal concentrations of temephos and propoxur at LC10, LC30 and LC50, respectively, and adult survivors were evaluated for fitness parameters. Sublethal effects were also evaluated in subsequent generations. Fecundity, egg hatchability, sex ratio, adult longevity and morphology of gonads were the end points studied and compared to the untreated control. Adverse changes in developmental traits were mainly observed in fecundity, egg hatchability and sex ratio. However, significant differences in adult longevity were observed in the insecticide-exposed population. Pleiotropic effects through prolonged larval duration and enhanced longevity of adults were observed. Morphology of gonads in the insecticide-exposed population was severely affected and is represented by rudimentary and atrophied testes, and the size of the vas deferens was very much reduced when compared to that of the control. In another set of experiments, circadian rhythm (for pupation and adult emergence) of LC10, LC30 and LC50 values to abovementioned insecticides exposed to late third instar larvae was studied. Pupation and adult emergence rhythms were found to be disturbed with an increase in concentrations of insecticides when compared to that of untreated control.

Keywords

Malathion Adult Emergence Sublethal Concentration Bifenthrin Adult Longevity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by financial assistance from University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi to Prof. N. J. Shetty.

References

  1. Aguilera L, Marquetti CM, Navarro A, Bisset J (1995) Effects of three organophophorus insecticides in the reproductive potential of Culex quinquefasciatus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 90:411–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A, Xue RD, Barnard DR (2006) Effects of sublethal exposure to boric acid sugar bait on adult survival, host-seeking, bloodfeeding behavior, and reproduction of Stegomyia albopicta. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22:464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alyokhin A, Baker M, Mota-Sanchez D, Dively G, Grafius E (2008) Colorado potato beetle resistance to insecticides. Am J Potato Res 85:395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bainbridge CA (1983) Factors affecting insecticide resistance in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). Thesis, Liverpool Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  5. Beard CB, Durvasula RV, Richards FF (1998) Bacterial symbiosis in arthropods and the control of disease transmission. Emerg Infect Dis 4:581–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaube HS, Pundhir VS (2005) Chemical control. In: Crop diseases and their management. Prentice-Hall, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis CF, Davies CR (2001) Present use of pesticides for vector and allergen control and future requirement. Med Vet Entomol 15:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daly H, Doyen JT, Purcell AH III (1998) Introduction to insect biology and diversity, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 279–300, Chapter 14Google Scholar
  9. Eesa NM, Cutkomp KL (1995) Pesticide chronotoxicity to insects and mites: an overview. Jour Islm Acad Sci 8:21–28Google Scholar
  10. Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gayathri DK, Shetty NJ (1992) Chromosomal translocation and inherited semisterility in the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston. J Commun Dis 24:70–74Google Scholar
  12. Georghiou GP (1965) Effects of carbamates on house fly fecundity, longevity and food intake. J Econ Entomol 58:58–62Google Scholar
  13. Haddow AJ, Gillet JD, Corbet PS (1959) Laboratory observations on pupation and emergence in the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 53:123–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haynes KF (1988) Sublethal effects of neurotoxic insecticides on insect behavior. Ann Rev Entomol 33:149–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee CY (2000) Sublethal effects of insecticides on longevity, fecundity and behaviour of insect pests—a review. J Biosci 11:1–6Google Scholar
  16. Maddrell SHP, Reynolds SE (1972) Release of hormones in insects after poisoning with insecticides. Nature 236:404–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB (2010) Variation, natural selection and evolution. In: Protecting life on earth—an introduction to the science of conservation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Minitab (2010) Minitab statistical software. Version 16. Minitab Inc., State College, PAGoogle Scholar
  19. Minn ZM, Shetty NJ (2008) Toxicological effect of malathion and alphamethrin on reproductive potential in Aedes aegypti, a yellow fever mosquito. Pestology 32:39–43Google Scholar
  20. National Vector Borne Diseases Control Programme & Directorate General of Health Services (2007) Guidelines for integrated vector management for control of dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  21. Nayar JK, Sauerman DM (1970) A comparative study and development in Florida mosquito. I. Effects of environmental factors on ontogenetic timings, endogenous diurnal rhythm and synchrony of pupation and emergence. J Med Entomol 7:163–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Priyalakshmi BL, Rajashree BH, Ghosh C, Shetty NJ (1999) Effect of fenitrothion, deltamethrin and cypermethrin on reproductive potential and longevity of life cycle in Anopheles stephensi Liston, a malaria mosquito. J Parasit Dis 23:125–128Google Scholar
  23. Rajashree BH, Shetty NJ (1998) Genetic study of deltamethrin resistance in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi Liston. J Parasit Dis 22:140–143Google Scholar
  24. Rao DEG, Shetty NJ (1992) Effect of insecticide resistance on reproductive potential in Anopheles stephensi Liston, a malaria mosquito. Int J Occup Env Health 1:48–52Google Scholar
  25. Reyes-Villanueva F, Juarez-Eguia M, Flores-Leal A (1990) Effects of sublethal dosages of Abate® upon adult fecundity and longevity of Aedes aegypti. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6:739–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert LL, Olson JK (1989) Effects of sublethal dosages of insecticides on Culex quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 5:239–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts DR, Smolensky JA, Bartholomew PH, Scanlon JE (1974) Circadian pattern in susceptibility of Aedes aegypti (L.) larvae to Dursban. In: Scheving LE, Halberg F, Pauly JE (eds) Chronobiology. Igaku Schoin Ltd, Tokyo, pp 612–616Google Scholar
  28. Saelim V, Brogdon WG, Rojanapremsuk J, Suvannadabba S, Pandii W, Jones WJ, Sithiprasasna R (2005) Bottle and biochemical assays on temephos resistance in Aedes aegypti in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health 36:417–425Google Scholar
  29. Sanil D, Shetty NJ (2010) Genetic study of propoxur resistance (pr)—a carbamate insecticide in the malaria mosquito, Anopheles stephensi Liston. Malaria Research and Treatment 2010:6. doi: 10.4061/2010/5028242010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanil D, Shetty NJ (2009) Genetic study of temephos resistance (tr), an organophosphate insecticide in the malaria mosquito, Anopheles stephensi Liston. J Cytol Genet 11:15–22Google Scholar
  31. Shetty NJ (1983) Chromosomal translocations and semisterility in the malaria vector Anopheles fluviatilis James. Indian J Malariol 20:45–48Google Scholar
  32. Shetty NJ (1987) Genetic sexing system for the preferential elimination of females in Culex quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 3:84–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shetty NJ (1997) Genetic control of mosquito vectors of diseases. J Parasit Dis 21:113–121Google Scholar
  34. Shetty NJ (2002) The genetic control of Anopheles stephensi—a malaria mosquito. In: Raghunath D, Nayak R (eds) Trends in malaria and vaccine research: the current Indian scenario. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, pp 44–79Google Scholar
  35. Shetty NJ, Vasanth SN, Sanil D (2007) Insecticide susceptibility studies of fenthion and temephos in thirty strains of An. stephensi Liston, a malaria mosquito. Pestology 31:33–39Google Scholar
  36. Shian LC (2007) The effect of sublethal concentration of abate on Aedes aegypti (linnaeus) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Says); Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  37. Stenersen J (2004) Chemical pesticides: mode of action and toxicology. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suh CPC, Orr DB, Van Duyn JW (2000) Effect of insecticides on Trichogramma exiguum (Hymenoptera; Trichogrammatidae) preimaginal development and adult survival. J Econ Entomol 93:577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutherland DJ, Beam FD, Gupta AP (1967) The effects of mosquitoes of sublethal exposure to insecticides DDT, dieldrin, malathion on the basal follicles of Aedes aegypti (L.). Mosq News 27:316–323Google Scholar
  40. USEPA (2001) Prevention, pesticide & toxic substance (7508C), United State Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 738-F-00-018.Google Scholar
  41. WHO (1981) Instruction for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticide. WHO/VBC/81.807.Google Scholar
  42. WHO (2005a) Propoxur. WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides. WHO, Geneva. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  43. WHO (2005b) Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicide. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCP.Google Scholar
  44. Zaim M, Jambullingam (2007) Global insecticide use of vector-borne disease control, 3rd edn. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Zin T, Shetty NJ (2008) Sublethal effect of bifenthrin and neem on fecundity, hatchability and sex ratio of Anopheles stephenesi Liston, a malaria mosquito. Pestology 32:39–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied GeneticsBangalore University, J. B. CampusBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Janardhana FoundationBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations