Parasitology Research

, Volume 109, Supplement 1, pp 139–148 | Cite as

The Efficacy of Trichlorphon and Naphthalophos against Multiple Anthelmintic-Resistant Nematodes of Naturally Infected Sheep in Argentina

  • César Fiel
  • Maricel Guzmán
  • Pedro Steffan
  • Edgardo Rodriguez
  • Olegario Prieto
  • Chandra Bhushan
Article

Abstract

An anthelmintic efficacy trial was conducted in sheep harbouring anthelmintic-resistant worms in Argentina. Seventy lambs were selected from a flock that had been grazed on pastures infected with trichostrongyles previously shown to be resistant to the main anthelmintic groups. Lambs were allocated to comparable groups of ten animals each and treated with trichlorphon (50 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) orally); naphthalophos (50 mg/kg b.w. orally); ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg b.w. subcutaneously); fenbendazole (5 mg/kg b.w. orally); levamisole (8 mg/kg b.w. subcutaneously) and closantel (10 mg/kg b.w. orally). There was also an untreated group. The dose selection was based on manufacturer’s recommendations.

Faecal samples were collected 0 and 10 days post treatment to estimate efficacy (faecal egg count reduction). Six animals from each group were necropsied at day 10 for enumeration/identification of worms from the abomasum, small and large intestines to determine the absolute efficacy of each agent (controlled efficacy test). Trichlorphon and naphthalophos were effective (> 99 %) against Haemonchus contortus (p < 0.05).

Naphthalophos also showed efficacy against Trichostrongylus axei (99.3 %), Teladorsagia circumcincta (97.8 %), Trichostrongylus colubriformis (99.2 %), Cooperia punctata/curticei/pectinata (90.4 %), Nematodirus spathiger (89.2 %) and Oesophagostomum venulosum/columbianum (93.7 %). Fenbendazole and levamisole showed efficacy (> 95 %) against all nematodes except T. colubriformis. The efficacy of ivermectin was low against H. contortus (23 %) and Cooperia spp. (46.3 %). Closantel showed low efficacy against T. axei (64.4 %), H. contortus (80.6 %) and T. colubriformis (59.5 %).

When anthelmintic resistance is widespread, trichlorphon treatment is appropriate if H. contortus is present; however, naphthalophos represents an effective therapeutic alternative for incorporation into worm control programmes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida FA, Garcia KC, Torgerson PR, Amarante AF (2010) Multiple resistance to anthelmintics by Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep in Brazil. Parasitol Int 59:622 – 625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anziani OS, Fiel CA (2005) Resistencia de los nematodes gastrointestinales a los antihelmínticos: un problema emergente y relevante para la producción bovina nacional. In: Resistencia a los antiparasitarios internos en Argentina, FAO, Producción y Sanidad Animal, pp 40 – 49.Google Scholar
  3. Caracostantógolo J, Castaño R, Cutullé Ch, Cetra B, Lamberti R, Olaechea F, Ruiz M, Schapiro J, Martinez M, Balbiani G, Castro M (2005) Evaluación de la resistencia a los antihelmínticos en rumiantes en Argentina. In: Resistencia a los antiparasitarios internos en Argentina, FAO, Producción y Sanidad Animal, pp 7 – 34.Google Scholar
  4. Conover WJ (1971) Practical nonparametric statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA, p 462.Google Scholar
  5. Cezar AS, Toscan G, Camillo G, Sangioni LA, Ribas HO, Vogel FS (2010) Multiple resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to nine different drugs in a sheep flock in southern Brazil. Vet Parasitol 173:157 – 160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede F, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor M, Waller P (1992) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) methods for detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 44:35 – 44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper NA, Rolfe PF, Searson JE, Dawson KL (1996). Naphthalophos combinations with benzimidazoles or levamisole as effective anthelmintics for sheep. Aust Vet J 3:221 – 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. da Cruz DG, da Rocha LO, Arruda SS, Palieraqui JGB, Cordeiro RC, Junior ES, Molento MB, Santos CP (2010) Anthelmintic efficacy and management practices in sheep farms from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 170:340 – 343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eddi C, Caracostantogolo J, Peña M, Schapiro J, Marangunich L, Waller PJ, Hansen J (1996) The prevalence of anthelmintic resistance en nematodes parasites of sheep in Southern Latina America: Argentina. Vet Parasitol 62:189 – 197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiel CA, Domínguez A, Fernandez A, Saumell C (1991a) Variación estacional del parasitismo interno en borregas Corriedale del partido de Tandil (Pcia. de Bs.As.). Su efecto en producción. X Congreso Latinoamericano de Parasitología y I Congreso Uruguayo de Parasitología. Montevideo, Uruguay, 22 de noviembre.Google Scholar
  11. Fiel C, Dominguez A, Fernandez A, Saumell C (1991b) Variación estacional del parasitismo interno de los ovinos en el partido de Ayacucho. Su efecto sobre aspectos productivos. X Congreso Latinoamericano de Parasitología y I Congreso Uruguayo de Parasitología. Montevideo, Uruguay, 22 de noviembre.Google Scholar
  12. Gordon H (1958) Studies on anthelmintic for sheep. Some organic phosphorus compounds. Aust Vet J 34:104 – 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebden SP, Hall CA (1965) Rametin as an anthelmintic for sheep. Vet Rec 77:207 – 210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson F (1993) Anthelmintic resistance – the state of play. Brit Vet J 149:123 – 138.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan RM (2004) Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends Parasitol 20:477 – 481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanusse C (1994). Bases farmacológicas de la terapéutica antihelmítica. In: Nari and Fiel (eds) Enfermedades parasitarias de importancia económica en bovinos. Bases epidemiológicas para su control y prevención en Argentina y Uruguay. Ed Hemisferio Sur, pp 33 – 65.Google Scholar
  17. Lee ET (1992) Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA, p 482.Google Scholar
  18. Le Jambre LF, Geoghegan J, Lyndal-Murphy M (2005) Characterization of moxidectin resistant Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol 128:83 – 90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopes WDZ, dos Santos TR, Borges FA, Sakamoto CAM, Soares VE, Costa GHN, Camargo G, Pulga ME, Bhushan C, daCosta AJ (2009) Anthelmintic efficacy of oral trichlorphon solution against ivermectin resistant nematode strains in cattle. Vet Parasitol 166:98 – 102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorenzelli E, Nari A, Machi I, Dondo E (1996) Prueba controlada de eficacia del Nafthalofos en establecimientos con antecedentes de resistencia antihelmíntica en ovinos. Rev Med Vet 77:173 – 180.Google Scholar
  21. Lukovich A (1981) Identificación de las formas adultas de los nematodes gastrointestinales y pulmonares de los rumiantes en la República Argentina, Publ. INTA – Castelar, Argentina.Google Scholar
  22. Presidente PJA (1985). Methods for the detection of resistance to anthelmintics. In: Anderson N, Waller PJ (eds) Resistance in nematodes to anthelmintic drugs. Division of Animal Health, CSIRO, Australia, pp 13 – 27.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts F, O’Sullivan P (1949) Methods for egg count and larval cultures for strongyles infesting gastrointestinal tract of cattle. Aust J Agric Res 1:99 – 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Romero JR, Boero CA, Vázquez R, Aristizabal MT, Baldo A (1998) Estudio de resistencia a antihelmínticos en majadas de la mesopotamia argentina. Rev Med Vet 79:342 – 346.Google Scholar
  25. Romero JR, Boero CA (2001) Epidemiología de la gastroenteritis verminosa de los ovinos en las regiones templadas y cálidas de la argentina. Rev Analecta Veterinaria 21(1):21–37.Google Scholar
  26. Soutello RG, Seno MC, Amarante AF (2007) Anthelmintic resistance in cattle nematodes in northwestern São Paulo State, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 148:360 – 364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Southcott WH (1961) Toxicity and anthelmintic efficiency of Neguvon for sheep. Aust Vet J 37:55 – 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stampa S (1959) The control of internal parasites of sheep with Neguvon and Asuntol. Apreliminary report. J S Afr Vet Med 30:19 – 26.Google Scholar
  29. Suarez VH (2002) Helminthic control on grazing ruminants and environmental risks in South America. Vet Res 33:563 – 573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutherland IA, Leathwick DM (2011) Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: a global issue? Trends Parasitol 27(4):176–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bayer S.940 (0,0-diethyl-0-naphthaloximido- phosphate) an anthelmintic for sheep. N Z Vet J 12:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Train CT, White RG, Hansen MF (1968) Efficacy of Coumaphos and Naphthalophos against nematodes of lambs. Am Vet Med Assoc 29:2331 – 2335.Google Scholar
  33. Traversa D, Paoletti B, Otranto D, Miller J ( 2007) First report of multiple drug resistance in trichostrongyles affecting sheep under field conditions in Italy. Parasitol Res 101:1713 – 1716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vercruysse J, Rew RS (2003) Macrocyclic lactones in antiparasitic therapy. CABI Publishing Cromwell Press, Trowbridge, UK, pp 432.Google Scholar
  35. Wood IB, Amaral NK, Bairden K, Duncan JL, Kassai T, Malone JB, Pankavich JA, Reinecke RK, Slocombe O, Taylor SM, Vercruysse J (1995) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP). Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics in ruminants (bovine and ovine). Vet Parasitol 10:205 – 264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • César Fiel
    • 1
  • Maricel Guzmán
    • 1
  • Pedro Steffan
    • 1
  • Edgardo Rodriguez
    • 2
  • Olegario Prieto
    • 3
  • Chandra Bhushan
    • 4
  1. 1.Área de Parasitología, Facultad de Ciencias VeterinariasUNCPBATandilArgentina
  2. 2.Área de Bioestadística, Facultad de Ciencias VeterinariasUNCPBATandilArgentina
  3. 3.Bayer HealthCare, Animal Health DivisionMunro, Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Bayer HealthCare, Animal Health DivisionMonheimGermany

Personalised recommendations