Parasitology Research

, Volume 107, Issue 6, pp 1509–1514 | Cite as

Does the number of sclerotised structures used for the systematics of monogeneans change with age? A study of the monocotylid Dendromonocotyle pipinna

  • Jean-Lou JustineEmail author
  • Adeline Grugeaud
Short Communication


Although monogenean systematics is often based on the morphological analysis of sclerotised structures, their variation with size or age is rarely investigated. Two hundred specimens of the monocotylid Dendromonocotyle pipinna Chisholm and Whittington 2004 were studied. In the haptor, the numbers of marginal papillae, of sclerites in the marginal papillae and of sclerites in the septa did not change according to the size; however, the mean interval between the sclerites in the septa increased linearly with body length. This suggests that, at least in certain cases, valuable systematic descriptions can be made on incompletely grown monogeneans.


Body Length Actual Length Body Width Copulatory Organ Male Copulatory Organ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Marine Briand helped in the parasitological investigation. Leslie Chisholm and Ian Whittington (South Australian Museum, Adelaide) kindly identified the parasites and provided literature. Ian Whittington kindly commented an early draft of the manuscript and provided literature and advice.


  1. Chisholm LA, Whittington ID (2004) Two new species of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the skin of Taeniura meyeni (Dasyatidae) and Aetobatus narinari (Myliobatidae) from aquaria in Queensland, Australia. Syst Parasitol 57:221–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chisholm LA, Whittington ID, Fischer ABP (2004) A review of Dendromonocotyle (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the skin of stingrays and their control in public aquaria. Folia Parasitol 51:123–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Justine J-L (2005) Species of Pseudorhabdosynochus Yamaguti, 1958 (Monogenea: Diplectanidae) from Epinephelus fasciatus and E. merra (Perciformes: Serranidae) off New Caledonia and other parts of the Indo-Pacific Ocean, with a comparison of measurements of specimens prepared using different methods, and a description of P. caledonicus n. sp. Syst Parasitol 62:1–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Justine J-L, Grugeaud A, Keller F, Leblanc P (2010) Two thousand parasites on a single ray: an infection with two species of skin monogeneans on a blotched fantail ray kept in an aquarium. Acta Parasitol 55:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kearn GC (1963) The egg, oncomiracidium and larval development of Entobdella soleae, a monogenean skin parasite of the common sole. Parasitology 53:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kearn GC (1990) The rate of development and longevity of the monogenean skin parasite Entobdella soleae. J Helminthol 64:340–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Klassen GJ, Beverley-Burton M, Locke A (1989) A revision of Entobdella Blainville (Monogenea: Capsalidae) with particular reference to E. hippoglossi and E. squamula: the use of ratios in taxonomy and key to species. Can J Zool 67:1869–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lackenby JA, Chambers CB, Ernst I, Whittington ID (2007) Effect of water temperature on reproductive development of Benedenia seriolae (Monogenea: Capsalidae) from Seriola lalandi in Australia. Dis Aquat Org 74:235–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ogawa K (1984) Development of Benedenia hoshinai (Monogenea) with some notes on its occurrence on the host. Bull Jap Soc Scient Fish 50:2005–2011Google Scholar
  10. Rasband WS (1997–2009) ImageJ. Computer program. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
  11. Vaughan DB, Chisholm L, Chritison K (2008) Overview of South African Dendromonocotyle (Monogenea: Monocotylidae), with descriptions of 2 new species from stingrays (Dasyatidae) kept in public aquaria. Zootaxa 1826:26–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis cedex 05France
  2. 2.Aquarium des LagonsNouméaNew Caledonia

Personalised recommendations