Parasitology Research

, Volume 107, Issue 4, pp 909–914 | Cite as

Ethanol-fixed material used for both classical and molecular identification purposes: Eudiplozoon nipponicum (Monogenea: Diplozoidae) as a case parasite species

  • Eva KoškováEmail author
  • Iveta Matějusová
  • Kristína Civáňová
  • Božena Koubková
Original Paper


This study is focused on the feasibility of two treatments of alcohol-fixed monogenean parasites which are intended to be use for the combined morphological and molecular characterizations. The monogenean parasite, Eudiplozoon nipponicum, was selected as a model parasite species; however it is expected that these techniques will be suitable for other monogeneans and other parasitic families. The haptor of diplozoid parasites is equipped with sclerotized attachment clamps and central hooks which are utilized for morphological identification. As parasite tissue become very tough and rigid when preserved in ethanol, using these structures for species identification without additional treatment is difficult. We investigated two different techniques to digest the surrounding tissues, the first was treatment with 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and the second treatment was proteinase K. Tissue was successfully digested in both treatments and all clamps, central hook and even individual sclerites of the clamps were clearly visible and well defined. After treatment, the digest was used to extract genomic DNA, and the second internal transcribed spacer of the ribosomal DNA genes (rDNA) was amplified. Nucleic acid sequence was obtained from 90% of parasite specimens processed by both treatments. Treatment of haptors with SDS was proven to be more successful with no visible changes or damage observed to sclerites even after a month. This method represents a useful tool for the combined morphological and molecular studies as the correct sequence can be assigned to the same individual worm from which haptoral parts have been obtained.


Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Nucleic Acid Sequence ITS2 rDNA Parasite Tissue Monogenean Parasite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation Grant No. 524/07/1610 and No. 526/09/H025, Long-Term Research Plan MSM 0021622416 and Ichthyoparasitology Research Centre of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (LC 522).


  1. Dzikowksi R, Levy MG, Poore MF, Flower JR, Paperna I (2003) Genetic and morphologic differentiation of Bolbophorus confusus and B. levantinus (Digenea: Diplostomatidae), based on rDNA SSU polymorphism and SEM. Dis Aquat Org 57:231–235. doi: 10.3354/dao057231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ergens R (1969) The suitability of ammonium picrate-gylcerin in preparing slides of lower Monogenoidea. Folia Parasitol 16:320Google Scholar
  3. Galli P, Strona G, Villa AM, Benzoni F, Fabrizio S, Maria DS, Kritsky DC (2006) Three-dimensional imaging of monogenoidean sclerites by laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Parasitol 92:395–399. doi: 10.1645/GE-3544RN.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Galli P, Strona G, Villa AM, Benzoni F, Fabrizio S, Maria DS, Kritsky DC (2007) Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional morphometry of monogenoidean sclerites. Int J Parasitol 37:449–456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao Q, Chen MX, Yao WJ, Gao Y, Song Y, Wang GT, Wang MX, Nie P (2007) Phylogeny of diplozoids in five genera of the subfamily Diplozoinae Palombi, 1949 as inferred from ITS-2 rDNA sequences. Parasitology 134:695–703. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006001971 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris PD, Cable J, Tinsley RC, Lazarus CM (1999) Combined ribosomal DNA and morphological analysis of individual gyrodactylid monogeneans. J Parasitol 85:188–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huyse T, Malmberg G, Volckaert FAM (2004) Four new species of Gyrodactylus von Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae) on gobiid fishes: combined DNA and morphological analyses. Syst Parasitol 59:103–120. doi: 10.1023/B:SYPA.0000044427.81580.33 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Khotenovsky IA (1985) The subclass octomacrinea Khotenovsky. Nauka, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  9. Kritsky DC, Leiby PD, Kayton RJ (1978) A rapid stain technique for the haptoral bars of Gyrodactylus species (Monogenea). J Parasitol 64:172–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Malmberg G (1957) Om förekomsten av Gyrodactylus på svenska fiskar. Skrifter utgivna av Södra Sveriges Fiskeriförening, Årsskrift 1956, 19–76Google Scholar
  11. Matejusová I, Koubková B, D’Amelio S, Cunningham CO (2001) Genetic characterization of six species of diplozoids (Monogenea; Diplozoidae). Parasitology 123:465–474. doi: 10.1017/S0031182001008617 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Matejusová I, Koubková B, Gelnar M, Cunningham CO (2002) Paradiplozoon homoion Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1959 versus P. gracile Reichenbach-Klinke, 1961 (Monogenea): two species or phenotypic plasticity? Syst Parasitol 53:39–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1019945921143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Matejusová I, Koubková B, Cunningham CO (2004) Identification of european diplozoids (Monogenea, Diplozoinae) by restriction digestion of ribosomal RNA internal transcribed spacer. J Parasitol 90:817–822. doi: 10.1645/GE-138R CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Olstad K, Bachmann L, Bakke TA (2009) Phenotypic plasticity of taxonomic and diagnostic structures in gyrodatylosis-causing flatworms (Monogenea, Platyhelmithes). Parasitology 136:1305–1315. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009990680 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Přikrylová I, Matejusová I, Jarkovský J, Gelnar M (2008) Morphometric comparison of three members of the Gyrodactylus nemachili-like species group (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae) on Barbatula barbatula L., in the Czech Republic, with a reinstatement of G. papernai Ergens & Bychowsky, 1967. Syst Parasitol 69:33–44. doi: 10.1007/s11230-007-9106-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rokicka M, Lumpe J, Zietara MS (2007) Identification of Gyrodactylus ectoparasites in Polish salmonid farms by PCR-RFLP of the nuclear ITS segment of ribosomal DNA (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae). Acta Parasitol 52:185–195. doi: 10.2478/s11686-007-0032-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shamsi S, Norman R, Gasser R, Beveridge I (2009) Genetic and morphological evidences for the existence of sibling species within Contracaecum rudolphii (Hartwich, 1964) (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Australia. Parasitol Res 105:529–538. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1424-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shinn AP, Gibson DI, Sommerville Ch (1993) An SEM study of the haptoral sclerites of genus Gyrodactylus Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea) following extraction by digestion and sonication technique. Syst Parasitol 25:135–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00009983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sicard M, Desmarais E, Vigneux F, Shimazu T, Lambert A (2003) Molecular phylogeny of the Diplozoidae (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea) parasitizing 12 species of Cyprinadea (Teleostei): new data about speciation. In: Combes C, Joudane J (eds) Taxonomy, ecology and evolution of metazoan parasites. Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, Perpignan, France, pp 199–211Google Scholar
  20. Strona G, Stefani F, Galli P (2009) Field preservation of monogenean parasites for molecular and morphological analyses. Parasitol Int 58:51–54. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wong WL, Tan WB, Lim LH (2006) Sodium dodecyl sulphate as a rapid clearing agent for studying the hard parts of monogeneans and nematodes. J Helminthol 80:87–90. doi: 10.1079/JOH2005320 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Košková
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iveta Matějusová
    • 2
  • Kristína Civáňová
    • 1
  • Božena Koubková
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Molecular Genetics, Marine LaboratoryAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations