Parasitology Research

, Volume 107, Issue 3, pp 713–719 | Cite as

Gastrointestinal and ectoparasites from urban stray dogs in Fortaleza (Brazil): high infection risk for humans?

  • Sven Klimpel
  • Jörg Heukelbach
  • David Pothmann
  • Sonja Rückert
Original Paper

Abstract

Dogs are important definite or reservoir hosts for zoonotic parasites. However, only few studies on the prevalence of intestinal parasites in urban areas in Brazil are available. We performed a comprehensive study on parasites of stray dogs in a Brazilian metropolitan area. We included 46 stray dogs caught in the urban areas of Fortaleza (northeast Brazil). After euthanization, dogs were autopsied. Ectoparasites were collected, and the intestinal content of dogs were examined for the presence of parasites. Faecal samples were collected and analysed using merthiolate iodine formaldehyde concentration method. A total of nine different parasite species were found, including five endoparasite (one protozoan, one cestode and three nematode species) and four ectoparasite species (two flea, one louse and one tick species). In the intestinal content, 3,162 specimens of four helminth species were found: Ancylostoma caninum (prevalence, 95.7%), Dipylidium caninum (45.7%), Toxocara canis (8.7%) and Trichuris vulpis (4.3%). A total of 394 ectoparasite specimens were identified, including Rhipicephalus sanguineus (prevalence, 100.0%), Heterodoxus spiniger (67.4%), Ctenocephalides canis (39.1%) and Ctenocephalides felis (17.4%). In the faeces, intestinal parasites were detected in 38 stray dogs (82.6%), including oocysts of Giardia sp. (2.2%) and eggs of the nematode A. caninum (82.6%). Neither eggs nor larval stages of D. caninum, T. canis or T. vulpis were detected in dog faeces. Sensitivity of faecal examination for A. caninum was 86.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.0–94.3) but zero percentage for the other intestinal helminth species. Our data show that stray dogs in northeast Brazil carry a multitude of zoonotic ecto- and endoparasites, posing a considerable risk for humans. With the exception of A. caninum, sensitivity of faecal examination was negligible.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the head, Evansia Alves Ventura, and the staff of the Centro do Controle de Zoonoses of Fortaleza for supporting our study. Mirela Costa de Miranda, Eduardo Rebouças Carvalho and Francisco Iure Sampaio Lira assisted in the autopsies. J.H. is research fellow from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brazil).

References

  1. Andresiuk V, Sardella N, Deneger G (2007) Seasonal fluctuations in prevalence of dog intestinal parasites in public squares of Mar del Plata city, Argentina and its risk for humans. Rev Argent Microbiol 39:221–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barutzki D, Schaper R (2003) Endoparasites in dogs and cats in Germany 1999–2002. Parasitol Res 90:S148–S150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck AM (2000) The human–dog relationship: a tale of two species. In: Macpherson CNL, Meslin FX, Wandeler AI (eds) Dogs, zoonoses and public health. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bush O, Lafferty AD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dantas-Torres F (2008a) Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasites Vectors 1:25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dantas-Torres F (2008b) The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreill, 1806) (Ascari: Ixodidae): from taxonomy to control. Vet Parasitol 152:173–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Avelar DM, Bussolotti AS, Ramos MCA, Linardi PM (2007) Endosymbionts of Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) obtained from dogs captured in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerias, Brazil. J Invertebr Pathol 94:149–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn JJ, Columbus ST, Aldeen WE, Davis M, Carroll KC (2002) Trichuris vulpis recovered from a patient with chronic diarrhea and five dogs. J Clin Microbiol 40:2703–2704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldmeier H, Heukelbach J (2009) Epidermal parasitic skin diseases: a neglected category of poverty-associated plagues. Bull World Health Organ 87:152–159Google Scholar
  10. Furtado AP, Do Carmo ES, Giese EG, Vallinoto ACR, Lanfredi RM, Santos JN (2009) Detection of dog filariasis in Marajo Island, Brazil by classical and molecular methods. Parasitol Res 105:1509–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gennari SM, Kasai N, Pena HFJ, Cortez A (1999) Occurence of protozoan and helminths in faecal samples of dogs and cats from São Paulo city. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 36:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser C, Lewis P, Wong S (2000) Pet-, animal-, and vector-borne infections. Pediatr Rev 21:219–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. González A, Castro DC, González S (2004) Ectoparasitic species from Canis familiaris (Linné) in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Vet Parasitol 120:123–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gracenea M, Gómez MS, Torres J (2009) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in shelter dogs and cats in the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain). Acta Parasitol 54:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heukelbach J, Hengge U (2009) Bed bugs, leeches and hookworm larvae in the skin. Clin Dermatol 27:285–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heukelbach J, van Haeff E, Rump B, Wilcke T, Sabóia Moura RC, Feldmeier H (2003) Parasitic skin diseases: health-care seeking in a slum in northeast Brazil. Trop Med Int Health 8:368–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heukelbach J, Wilcke T, Feldmeier H (2004) Cutaneous larva migrans (creeping eruption) in an urban slum in Brazil. Int J Dermatol 43:511–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Irwin P, Traub R (2006) Parasitic diseases of cats and dogs in the tropics. Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 10:1–20Google Scholar
  19. Katagiri S, Oliveira-Sequeira TCG (2008) Prevalence of dog intestinal parasites and risk perception of zoonotic infection by dog owners in São Paulo State, Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health 55:406–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Klimpel S, Mehlhorn H, Heukelbach J, Feldmeier H, Mencke N (2005) Field trial of the efficacy of a combination of imidacloprid and permethrin against Tunga penetrans (sand flea, jigger fela) in dogs in Brazil. Parasitol Res 97:S113–S120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klimpel S, Förster M, Schmahl G (2007a) Parasites of two abundant sympatric rodent species in relation to host phylogeny and ecology. Parasitol Res 100:867–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klimpel S, Förster M, Schmahl G (2007b) Parasite fauna of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) in an urban region of Germany: reservoir host of zoonotic metazoan parasites? Parasitol Res 102:69–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Matter HC, Daniels TJ (2000) The human–dog relationship: a tale of two species. In: Macpherson CNL, Meslin FX, Wandeler AI (eds) Dogs, zoonoses and public health. CABI, Wallingford, pp 17–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehlhorn H, Düwel D, Raether W (1993) Diagnose und Therapie der Parasitosen von Haus-, Nutz- und Heimtieren. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  25. Molina CP, Ogbur J, Adegboyega P (2003) Infection by Dipylidium caninum in an infant. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:e157–e159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moriello KA (2003) Zoonotic skin diseases of dogs and cats. Anim Health Res Rev 4:157–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliveira-Sequeira TCG, Amarante AFT, Ferrari TB, Nunes LC (2002) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs from São Paulo State, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 103:19–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Otranto D, Danta-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB (2009) Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part one. Trends Parasitol 25:157–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostfeld RS, Holt RD (2004) Are predators good for health? evaluating evidence for top-down regulation of zoonotic disease reservoirs. Front Ecol Environ 2:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pedersen AB, Altizer S, Poss M, Cunningham AA, Nunn CL (2005) Patterns of host specificity and transmission among parasites of wild primates. Int J Parasitol 35:647–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramírez-Barrios RA, Baroza-Mena G, Munoz J, Angulo-Cubillán F, Hernández E, González F, Escalona F (2004) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs under veterinary care in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Vet Parasitol 121:11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Riemann F (1988) Nematoda. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 293–301Google Scholar
  33. Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Lymbrey AJ, Thompson RCA (2000) The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses. Int J Parasitol 30:1369–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rust MK (2005) Advances in the control of Ctenocephalides felis (cat lfea) on cats and dogs. Trends Parasitol 21:232–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Salb AL, Barkema HW, Elkin BT, Thompson RCA, Whiteside DP, Black SR, Dubey JP, Kutz SJ (2008) Dogs as sources and sentinels of parasites in humans and wildlife, northern Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 14:60–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Segoiva JM, Guerrero R, Torres J, Miquel J, Feliu C (2003) Ecological analyses of the intestinal helminth communities of the wolf, Canis lupus, in Spain. Folia Parasitol 50:231–236Google Scholar
  37. Stevenson AF (2004) Brazil, Market Development Reports, Pet Food Report. GAIN Report-BR4602:1-11Google Scholar
  38. Szabová E, Juriš P, Miterpáková M, Antolová D, Papajová I, Śefčíková H (2007) Prevalence of important zoonotic parasites in dog populations from the Slovak republic. Helminthologia 44:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RCAA (2002) The role of dogs in transmission of gastrointestinal parasites in a remote tea-growing community in northeastern India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67:539–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RCAA (2005) Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol 21:42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ugbomoiko US, Ariza L, Heukelbach J (2008) Parasites of importance for human health in Nigeria dogs: high prevalence and limited knowledge of pet owners. BMC Vet Res 4:49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. WSPA (2009) Stray animals. In: Wold Society for the Protection of Animals. (http://www.wspa-international.org/wspaswork/strayanimals/Default.aspx)
  43. Xhaxhiu D, Kusi I, Rapti D, Visser M, Knaus M, Lindner T, Rehbein S (2009) Ectoparasites of dogs and cats in Albania. Parasitol Res 105:1577–1587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Klimpel
    • 1
  • Jörg Heukelbach
    • 2
    • 3
  • David Pothmann
    • 4
  • Sonja Rückert
    • 5
  1. 1.Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F)Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Community Health, School of MedicineFederal University of CearáFortalezaBrazil
  3. 3.Anton Breinl Centre for Tropical Medicine and Public Health, School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation SciencesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Zoomorphology, Cell Biology and ParasitologyHeinrich-Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
  5. 5.Departments of Botany and ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations