Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 117–125 | Cite as

Fennoscandian distribution of an important parasite of cervids, the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), revisited

  • Panu Välimäki
  • Knut Madslien
  • Jonas Malmsten
  • Laura Härkönen
  • Sauli Härkönen
  • Arja Kaitala
  • Raine Kortet
  • Sauli Laaksonen
  • Reidar Mehl
  • Lisa Redford
  • Hannu Ylönen
  • Bjørnar Ytrehus
Original Paper

Abstract

The deer ked [Lipoptena cervi (L. 1758) (Dipt., Hippoboscidae)] is a blood-sucking ectoparasite of cervids. The species has been resident in Sweden for more than two centuries, whereas in Finland (≈50 years) and Norway (≈30 years), it has established itself relatively recently. L. cervi may cause serious health problems in its natural hosts, act as a vector for zoonotic diseases, and pose a socioeconomic threat to forest-based activity. In this paper, we review the distribution and former expansion of the species in Fennoscandia. The current distribution of L. cervi appears bimodal, and the geographical range expansion of the species shows notable differences across Fennoscandia. The western population in Norway and Sweden has its northern edge of range at respective latitudes of 61° N and 62° N, whereas the eastern population in Finland reaches 65° N. The future expansion of L. cervi is dependent on several interdependent extrinsic and intrinsic factors. International multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to achieve a synthesis on the factors affecting expansion rates and to understand the effects of L. cervi on wildlife, human health, and the rural societies of Fennoscandia.

Keywords

Western Population Eastern Population Moose Population National Veterinary Institute Wild Reindeer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff at the Research Centre of Friendship Park, all volunteers who have participated in data collecting, and L. Huldén for giving access to the Finnish Atlas Data. We also acknowledge Dr. Preben Ottesen and his staff at the Department of Pest Control at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Dr. Edgar Brun and his staff at the Section for Epidemiology at the National Veterinary Institute of Norway for their contributions in establishing and running www.flattogflue.no. The study was financed by Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation (grant to AK), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland, Ella och Georg Ehrnroots Stiftelse (grant to LH), and the National Health Surveillance Program for Cervids (HOP) in Norway.

References

  1. Andersen R (1991) Habitat deterioration and the migratory behaviour of moose (Alces alces) in Norway. J Appl Ecol 28:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson H (1985) De svenska lusflugorna. Entomologisk Tidsskrift 106:15–25Google Scholar
  3. Balashov YS (1996) The fluctuations of abundance of the deer louse-fly Lipoptena cervi (Hippoboscidae) in forests of the north-west Russia. Parazitologia 30:182–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball JP, Nordengren C, Wallin K (2001) Partial migration by large ungulates: characteristics of seasonal moose Alces alces ranges in northern Sweden. Wildlife Biol 7:39–47Google Scholar
  5. Bequaert J (1953) The Hippoboscidae or louse-flies (Diptera) of mammals and birds. Part I. Structure, physiology and natural history. Entomologica Americana 32(33):1–442Google Scholar
  6. Braschler B, Hill JK (2007) Role of larval host plants in the climate-driven range expansion of the butterfly Polygonia c-album. J Anim Ecol 76:415–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carius HJ, Little TJ, Ebert D (2001) Genetic variation in a host–parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1136–1145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cederlund G, Okarma H (1988) Home range and habitat use of adult female moose. J Wildlife Manage 52:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Council of Europe (1979) CETS no.: 104 – Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Bern, 19.IX.1979, in force since 1.VI.1982/1.III.2002. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=104&CM=8&CL=ENG. Accessed 17 January 2010
  10. Dambroski HR, Feder JL (2007) Host plant and latitude-related diapause variation in Rhagoletis pomonella: a test for multifaceted life history adaptation on different stages of diapause development. J Evol Biol 20:2101–2112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Danks HV (1987) Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. Biological Survey of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. Dehio C, Sauder U, Hiestand R (2004) Isolation of Barthonella schoenbuchensis from Lipoptena cervi, a blood sucking arthropod causing deer ked dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol 42:5320–5323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaston KJ (2009) Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:1395–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gundersen H, Andreassen HP, Storaas T (1998) Spatial and temporal correlates to Norwegian moose–train collisions. Alces 34:385–394Google Scholar
  15. Gundersen H, Andreassen HP, Storaas T (2004) Supplemental feeding of migratory moose Alces alces: forest damage at two spatial scales. Wildlife Biol 10:213–223Google Scholar
  16. Haarløv N (1964) Life cycle and distribution pattern of Lipoptena cervi (L.) (Dipt., Hippobosc.) on Danish deer. Oikos 15:93–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hackman W (1977) Hirven täikärpänen ja sen levittäytyminen Suomeen [The deer-fly, Lipoptena cervi, invading Finland]. Luonnon Tutkija 81:75–77Google Scholar
  18. Hackman W, Rantanen T, Vuojolahti R (1983) Immigration of Lipoptena cervi (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) in Finland, with notes on its biology and medical significance. Notulae Entomologicae 63:53–59Google Scholar
  19. Heikkinen S (2000) Hirven vuosi [The year of the moose]. Suomen Riista 46:82–91Google Scholar
  20. Hermosilla C, Pantchev N, Bachmann R, Bauer C (2006) Lipoptena cervi (deer ked) in two naturally infested dogs. Vet Rec 159:286–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Härkönen L, Härkönen S, Kaitala A, Kaunisto S, Kortet R, Laaksonen S, Ylönen H (2010) Predicting range expansion of an ectoparasite – the effect of summer temperatures on deer ked (Lipoptena cervi, Diptera: Hippoboscidae) performance along a latitudinal gradient. Ecography, in pressGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivanov BI (1974) On the damage done by Lipoptena cervi L. (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) in Byelorussia. Parasitologia 8:252–253Google Scholar
  23. Johnsen P (1946) Bidrag til kundskaben on den danske Ixodidae-fauna. Entomologiske Meddelelser 24:397–401Google Scholar
  24. Kaunisto S, Kortet R, Härkönen L, Härkönen S, Ylönen H, Laaksonen S (2008) New bedding site examination-based method to analyse deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infection in cervids. Parasitol Res 104:919–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kortet R, Härkönen L, Hokkanen P, Härkönen S, Kaitala A, Kaunisto S, Laaksonen S, Kekäläinen J, Ylönen H (2010) Experiments on the ectoparasitic deer ked that often attacks humans; preferences for body parts, colour and temperature. B Entomol Res 24:1–7Google Scholar
  26. Laukkanen A, Ruoppi P, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S (2005) Deer ked-induced occupational allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Ann Allerg Asthma Im 94:604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lavsund S, Nygrén T, Solberg EJ (2003) Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces 39:109–130Google Scholar
  28. Lehane M (2005) The biology of blood-sucking in insects. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsumoto K, Berrada ZL, Klinger E, Goethert HK, Telford SR III (2008) Molecular detection of Barthonella schoenbuchensis from ectoparasites of deer in Massachusetts. Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases 8:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehl R (1993) Hjortelusflua, et nytt, plagsomt insekt. MSIS-rapport, 38. [In Norwegian].Google Scholar
  31. Mehl R (2006) Hjortelusflua. Hjorteviltet 16:90–93Google Scholar
  32. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Inv 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Descimon H, Huntley B, Kaila L, Kullberg J, Tammaru T, Tennent WJ, Thomas JA, Warren M (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pulliainen E (1974) Seasonal movements of moose in Europe. Le Naturaliste Canadien 101:379–392Google Scholar
  36. Rantanen T, Reunala T, Vuojolahti P, Hackman W (1982) Persistent pruritic papules from deer ked bites. Acta Derm Venereol 62:307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Reindeer Herders’ Association (2009) Eloporojen määrä 1970/71–2004. http://www.paliskunnat.fi/gis_rap_tulokset.aspx. Accessed 05 May 2009
  38. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinclair ARE (1983) The function of distance movements in vertebrates. In: Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ (eds) The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 240–258Google Scholar
  40. Smith BL (2001) Winter feeding of elk in western North America. J Wildlife Manage 65:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strathdee AT, Bale JS (1998) Life on the edge: insect ecology in arctic environments. Ann Rev Entomol 43:85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt (2007) Sjukdomsläget hos vilt i Sverige 2006 — National Veterinary Institute’s Report Series 1. National Veterinary Institute, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  43. Statens Veterinärmedicinska Anstalt (2008) Sjukdomsläget hos vilt i Sverige 2007 — National Veterinary Institute’s Report Series 6. National Veterinary Institute, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sweanor PY, Sandegren F (1988) Migratory behaviour of related moose. Hol Ecol 11:190–193Google Scholar
  45. Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, Simmons AD, Davies ZG, Musche M, Conradt L (2001) Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vikøren T, Ytrehus B, Handeland K (2008) Helseovervåkingsprogrammet for hjortevilt (HOP), Årsrapport for 2006 og 2007 — National Veterinary Institute’s Report Series 19/2008. National Veterinary Institute, OsloGoogle Scholar
  48. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panu Välimäki
    • 1
  • Knut Madslien
    • 2
  • Jonas Malmsten
    • 3
  • Laura Härkönen
    • 1
  • Sauli Härkönen
    • 4
  • Arja Kaitala
    • 1
  • Raine Kortet
    • 5
  • Sauli Laaksonen
    • 6
  • Reidar Mehl
    • 7
  • Lisa Redford
    • 8
    • 9
  • Hannu Ylönen
    • 10
  • Bjørnar Ytrehus
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Section for Wildlife DiseasesNational Veterinary InstituteOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and Wildlife DiseasesNational Veterinary InstituteUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Metsästäjäin keskusjärjestöHelsinkiFinland
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
  6. 6.Fish and Wildlife Health Research UnitFinnish Food Safety AuthorityOuluFinland
  7. 7.Armed Forces Medical ServicesInstitute of MicrobiologyOsloNorway
  8. 8.HaganNorway
  9. 9.School of BiologyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneEngland
  10. 10.Konnevesi Research Station, Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations