Intrapopulational distribution of Meiogymnophallus minutus (Digenea, Gymnophallidae) infections in its first and second intermediate host
- 128 Downloads
Host size and age are generally assumed to play a pivotal role in digenean trematode infection patterns, accounting for much of the variation found within intermediate host populations. However, knowledge is based on a limited number of studied host–parasite systems. We investigated the shell length class distribution of Meiogymnophallus minutus infections within populations of the first intermediate host Scrobicularia plana and second intermediate host Cerastoderma edule. Infections occurred very early in the life of the two intermediate hosts. Both prevalence and intensity of infections increased with host shell length and displayed extremely high values amongst large individuals. Whilst metacercarial infection patterns in juvenile C. edule could be best explained by differences in host shell length, in adult cockles, the effect of host age on infection levels prevailed. The microsporidian hyperparasite Unikaryon legeri, occurring in the metacercarial stage of M. minutus, was particularly abundant in aged cockles, strongly influencing infection patterns of the gymnophallid. Our results are consistent with the intrapopulational distribution reported from other digenean trematode parasites. The relative influence of both host size and age and the underlying mechanisms as well as the impact of hyperparasitism on M. minutus infection patterns are discussed.
KeywordsIntermediate Host Shell Length Digestive Gland Infection Level Primary Host
Jan Fermer received funding from The Embark Initiative, operated by the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (IRCSET).
- Bowers EA, Bartoli P, Russell-Pinto F, James BL (1996) The metacercariae of sibling species of Meiogymnophallus, including M. rebecqui comb. nov. (Digenea: Gymnophallidae), and their effects on closely related Cerastoderma host species (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Parasitol Res 82:505–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desclaux C, Russell-Pinto F, de Montaudouin X, Bachelet G (2006) First record and description of metacercariae of Curtuteria arguinae n. sp. (Digenea: Echinostomatidae), parasite of cockles Cerastoderma edule (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in Arcachon Bay, France. J Parasitol 92:578–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jonsson PR, André C (1992) Mass mortality of the bivalve Cerastoderma edule on the Swedish west coast caused by infestation with the digenean trematode Cercaria cerastodermae I. Ophelia 36:151–157Google Scholar
- Kuris AM, Hechinger RF, Shaw JC, Whitney KL, Aguirre-Maced L, Boch CA, Dobson AP, Dunham EJ, Fredensborg BL, Huspeni TC, Lorda J, Mababa L, Mancini FT, Mora AB, Pickering M, Talhouk NL, Torchin ME, Lafferty KD (2008) Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454:515–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang WH, Dennis EA (1976) Morphology and seasonal incidence of infection of Proctoeces maculatus (Looss, 1901) Odhner, 1911 (Trematoda) in Mytilus edulis L. Ophelia 15:65–75Google Scholar
- Lauckner G (1980) Diseases of Mollusca: Gastropoda. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, volume I general aspects. Protozoa to Gastropoda. Wiley, New York, pp 311–424Google Scholar
- Lauckner G (1983) Diseases of Mollusca: Bivalvia. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, volume II introduction. Bivalvia to Scaphopoda. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 477–961Google Scholar
- Levron C, Ternengo S, Toguebaye BS, Marchand B (2004) Ultrastructural description of the life cycle of Nosema diphterostomi sp. n., a microsporidia hyperparasite of Diphterostomum brusinae (Digenea: Zoogonidae), intestinal parasite of Diplodus annularis (Pisces: Teleostei). Acta Protozool 43:329–336Google Scholar
- Sousa WP (1991) Can models of soft-sediment community structure be complete without parasites? Am Zool 31:821–830Google Scholar
- Vahl O (1972) Porosity of the gill, oxygen consumption and pumping rate in Cardium edule (L.) (Bivalvia). Ophelia 10:109–118Google Scholar