Parasitology Research

, Volume 105, Supplement 1, pp 157–162 | Cite as

Age, not Infection Dose, Determines the Outcome of Isospora suis Infections in Suckling Piglets

  • Hanna L. Worliczek
  • Hans-Christian Mundt
  • Bärbel Ruttkowski
  • Anja Joachim
Article

Abstract

Data from 13 trials involving 124 suckling piglets experimentally infected with Isospora suis were evaluated for the effects of infection dose and age on the clinical and parasitological outcome of infection in four different models, infections with 1,000 oocysts on the 1st day of life (d.o.l.) (model 1; 9 piglets/3 litters), 1,000 oocysts on the 4th d.o.l. (model 2; 25 piglets/11 litters), 1,500 oocysts on the 4th d.o.l. (model 3; 40 piglets/20 litters) and 10,000 oocysts on the 4th d.o.l. (model 4; 50 animals/10 litters). Weights were determined on the day of birth and in weekly intervals. Faecal consistency and quantitative oocysts excretion were evaluated for 2 weeks starting 4 days after infection (d.p.i.). The weight gain depression was most noticeable in model 2 (infection on the 1st d.o.l.), where animals only gained 2.08 x their birth weight until the 22nd d.o.l., compared to 2.31–2.52 x in the other groups. This correlated with the occurrence of watery diarrhoea which was found in 37 % of the samples in the acute phase (4–11 d.p.i.) in model 2 but only in 12–20 % of the samples in the other models. Median oocyst excretion peaked earlier in the models with higher infection doses but reached the highest values in model 2 (early infection). As in previous studies, this cross-sectional analysis of a larger number of animals confirms the influence of age on the outcome of isosporosis in suckling piglets, stressing the need to control the infection at an early life phase.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daugschies A, Bialek R, Joachim A, Mundt H-C (2001) Autofluorescence microscopy for the detection of nematode eggs and protozoa, in particular Isospora suis, in swine faeces. Parasitol Res 87:409–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Koudela B, Vodstrcilová M, Klimes B, Vladik P, Vitovec J (1991) Use of the anticoccidial agent tortrazuril (Baycox®, Bayer) in coccidiosis in suckling pigs. Vet Med (Praha) 36:657–663.Google Scholar
  3. Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL, Powe TA (1992) Enteric coccidial infections and coccidiosis in swine. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 14:698–702.Google Scholar
  4. Lindsay DS, Current WL, Taylor JR (1985) Effects of experimentally induced Isospora suis infection on morbidity, mortality, and weight gains in nursing pigs. Am J Vet Res 46:1511–1512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Maes D, Vyt P, Rabaeys P, Gevaert D (2007) Effects of toltrazuril on the growth of piglets in herds without clinical isosporosis. Vet J 173:199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Martineau GP, del Castillo J (2000) Epidemiological, clinical and control investigations on field porcine coccidiosis: clinical, epidemiological and parasitological paradigms? Parasitol Res 86:834–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matuschka FR, Heydorn AO (1980) Die Entwicklung von Isospora suis (Biester und Murray 1934) (Sporozoa: Coccidia: Eimeriidae) im Schwein. Zoologische Beiträge. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. Mundt H-C, Joachim A, Daugschies A, Zimmermann M (2003) Population biology studies on Isospora suis in piglets. Parasitol Res 90 Suppl 3:158–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mundt H-C, Joachim A, Becka M, Daugschies A (2006) Isospora suis: an experimental model for mammalian intestinal coccidiosis. Parasitol Res 98:167–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mundt H-C, Mundt-Wüstenberg S, Daugschies A, Joachim A (2007) Efficacy of various anticoccidials against experimental porcine neonatal isosporosis. Parasitol Res 100:401–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mundt H-C, Krüger M, Westphal B, Mengel H, Krüger MU, Dittmar K, Kuhnert Y, Daugschies A (2008) Investigations into the synergic effect of postnatal experimental infection with Isospora suis and natural infection with Clostridium perfringens β 2 for the development of necrotic enteritis in piglets. Oral Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the IVPS, Durban, South Africa:133.Google Scholar
  12. Niestrath M, Takla M, Joachim A, Daugschies A (2002) The role of Isospora suis as a pathogen in conventional piglet production in Germany. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Publ Health 49:176–180.Google Scholar
  13. Roberts L, Walker EJ (1982) Field study of coccidial and rotaviral diarrhoea in unweaned piglets. Vet Rec 110:11–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stuart BP, Gosser HS, Allen CB, Bedell DM (1982) Coccidiosis in swine: dose and age response to Isospora suis. Can J Comp Med 46:317–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vitovec J, Koudela B (1987) Pathology of natural isosporosis in nursing piglets. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 34:199–204.Google Scholar
  16. Vitovec J, Koudela B (1990) Double alteration of the small intestine in conventional and gnotobiotic piglets experimentally infected with the coccidium Isospora suis (Apicomplexa, Eimeriidae). Folia Parasitol (Praha) 37:21–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna L. Worliczek
    • 1
  • Hans-Christian Mundt
    • 2
  • Bärbel Ruttkowski
    • 1
  • Anja Joachim
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Parasitology and Zoology, Department of PathobiologyUniversity of Veterinary MedicineViennaAustria
  2. 2.Bayer Animal Health GmbHLeverkusenGermany

Personalised recommendations