Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, 104:523 | Cite as

Transmission of fish parasites into grouper mariculture (Serranidae: Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822)) in Lampung Bay, Indonesia

  • Sonja Rückert
  • Sven Klimpel
  • Saleh Al-Quraishy
  • Heinz Mehlhorn
  • Harry W. Palm
Original Paper

Abstract

Differently fed groupers Epinephelus coioides from an Indonesian finfish mariculture farm were studied for ecto- and endohelminth parasites. Pellet-fed E. coioides were infested with 13 parasite species/taxa of which six had a monoxenous and seven a heteroxenous life cycle. A total of 14 parasite species/taxa were found in the fish that were fed with different trash fish species, four of them with a monoxenous and ten with a heteroxenous life cycle. The use of pellet food significantly reduced the transfer of endohelminths and the number of parasites with a heteroxenous life cycle. Out of ten studied trash fish species, 62 parasite species were isolated (39% ectoparasitic and 61% endoparasitic), four of them also occurring in the cultured E. coioides and 14 in different groupers from Balai Budidaya Laut Lampung. The trash fish is held responsible for the transmission of these parasites into the mariculture fish. Endohelminth infestation of pellet fed fish demonstrates that parasite transfer also occurs via organisms that naturally live in, on, and in the surroundings of the net cages. Seventeen recorded invertebrates from the net cages might play an important role as intermediate hosts and hence parasite transmitters. The risk of parasite transfer can be considerably reduced by feeding selected trash fish species with a lower parasite burden, using only trash fish musculature or minimizing the abundance of invertebrates (fouling) on the net cages. These methods can control the endoparasite burden of cultivated fish without medication. The control of ectoparasites requires more elaborate techniques. Once they have succeeded in entering a mariculture farm, it is almost impossible to eliminate them from the system.

Keywords

Intermediate Host Parasite Species Fish Parasite Trash Fish Direct Life Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Mr. Sudjiharno, head of the National Seafarming Development Centre (Balai Budidaya Laut, BBL Lampung), for the possibility use the facilities at BBL, and Ireny Ohoiulun for her help during the trash fish investigation. Coauthor H.M. wants to thank the King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This study was supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF Grant No. 03F0391A, SPICE⁄LOICZ-project), the German Research Council (DFG PA 664/4-1).

References

  1. Blair A, Burgess WH (1979) Rotating, floating cage for fish culture simplifies cleaning and replacement of panels. Prog Fish-Cult 41:74–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braithwaite RA, McEvoy LA (2004) Marine biofouling on fish farms and its remediation. Adv Mar Biol 47:215–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray RA, Gibson DI (1980) The Fellodistomidae (Digenea) of fishes from the northeast Atlantic. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Zool) 37:199–293Google Scholar
  4. Bush AO, Lafferty KH, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davy B, Graham M (1979) Diseases of fish cultured for food in Southeast Asia. Report of a workshop held in Cisarua, Bogor, Indonesia, 28 November-1 December 1978. Ottawa, Ont., IDRC:32Google Scholar
  6. Diamant A, Banet A, Paperna I, von Westernhagen H, Broeg K, Kruener G, Koerting W, Zander S (1999) The use of fish metabolic, pathological and parasitological indices in pollution monitoring. II The Red Sea and Mediterranean. Helgol Mar Res 53:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO (2007) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Grabda J (1991) Marine fish parasitology: an outline. VCH-Verlag, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris E (2001) Status of Indonesian fisheries today and the research needed. Proceedings of the JSPS-DGHE International Symposium on Fisheries Science in tropical area. Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science-IPB Bogor-Indonesia, August 21–25, 2000:62–66Google Scholar
  10. Hodson SL, Burke CM, Bissett AP (2000) Biofouling of fish-cage netting: the efficacy of a silicone coating and the effect of netting colour. Aquaculture 184:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huss HH (1993) Assurance of seafood quality. FAO Fish Tech Pap 334:169Google Scholar
  12. Jones CM, Grutter AS, Cribb TH (2004) Cleaner fish become hosts: a novel form of transmission. Coral Reefs 23:521–529Google Scholar
  13. Klein B (1926) Ergebnisse mit einer Silbermethode bei Ciliaten. Arch Protistenkd 56:243–279Google Scholar
  14. Klein B (1958) The “dry” silver method and its proper use. J Protozool 5:99–103Google Scholar
  15. Klimpel S (2005) Distribution of nematodes of the family Anisakidae in commercially important fish species from the central and northern North Sea. Bull Fish Biol 7:161–168Google Scholar
  16. Klimpel S, Rückert S (2005) Life cycle strategy of Hysterothylacium aduncum to become the most abundant anisakid fish nematode in the North Sea. Parasitol Res 97:141–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klimpel S, Seehagen A, Palm HW (2003) Metazoan parasites and feeding behaviour of four small-sized fish species from the central North Sea. Parasitol Res 91:290–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klimpel S, Palm HW, Busch MW, Kellermanns E, Rückert S (2006) Fish parasites in the Arctic deep-sea: Poor diversity in pelagic fish species vs. heavy parasite load in a demersal fish. Deep Sea Res Pt I 53:1167–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klimpel S, Palm HW, Kellermanns E, Busch MW (2008) Fish parasites in the bathyal zone: The halosaur Halosauropsis macrochir (Günther, 1878) from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Deep Sea Res Pt II 55:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Køie M (1993) Aspects of the life cycle and morphology of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802) (Nematoda, Ascaridoidea, Anisakidae). Can J Zool 71:1289–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Køie M (2002) Spirorchid and serpulid polychaetes are candidates as invertebrate hosts for Myxozoa. Folia Parasitol 49:160–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Køie M, Whipps CM, Kent ML (2004) Ellipsomyxa gobii (Myxozoa: Ceratomyxidae) in the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei: Gobiidae) uses Nereis spp. (Annelida: Polychaeta) as invertebrate hosts. Folia Parasitol 51:14–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koesharyani I, Roza D, Mahardika K, Johnny F, Zafran (2001) Manual for fish disease diagnosis. II Marine fish and crustacean diseases in Indonesia. Gondol Research Institute for Mariculture, Central Research Institute for Sea Exploration and Fisheries, Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries and Japan International Cooperation Agency:49Google Scholar
  24. Lai H-C, Kessler AO, Khoo L-E (1993) Biofouling and its possible modes of control at fish farms in Penang, Malaysia. Asian Fish Sci 6:99–116Google Scholar
  25. Lee HB, Lim LC, Cheong L (1985) Observations on the use of antifouling paint in netcage fish farming in Singapore. Singap J Prim Ind 13:1–12Google Scholar
  26. Leong TS (1997) Control of parasites in cultured marine finfishes in Southeast Asia—an overview. Int J Parasitol 27:1177–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nowak BF (2007) Parasitic diseases in marine cage culture—an example of experimental evolution of parasites. Int J Parasitol 37:581–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palm HW (2004) The Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1863. IPB-PKSPL Press, BogorGoogle Scholar
  29. Paperna I (1995) Digenea (Phylum Platyhelminthes). In: Woo PTK (ed) Fish diseases and disorders. Volume 1: Protozoan and metazoan infections. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 329–390Google Scholar
  30. Riemann F (1988) Nematoda. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 293–301Google Scholar
  31. Rohde K (1984) Diseases caused by Metazoans: Helminths. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals. Volume IV, Part I Introductions, Pisces. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 193–320Google Scholar
  32. Rückert S (2006) Marine Fischparasiten in Indonesien: Befallssituation und Bedeutung für die Marikultur von Zackenbarschen. PhD thesis, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  33. Rückert S, Klimpel S, Palm HW (2008) Parasite fauna of seabass (Lates calcarifer) under mariculture conditions in Lampung Bay, Indonesia. J Appl Ichthyol 24:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sim SY, Rimmer MA, Toledo JD, Sugama K, Rumengan I, Williams KC, Phillips MJ (2005) A practical guide to feeds and feed management for cultured groupers. NACA, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  35. Tucker JW (1999) Species Profile: grouper aquaculture. SRAC Publ 721:10Google Scholar
  36. Tucker CS, Sommerville C, Wootten R (2002) Does size really matter? Effects of fish surface area on the settlement and initial survival of Lepeophtheirus salmonis, an ectoparasite of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Dis Aquat Org 49:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Velasquez CC (1976) Fish parasitology in conservation and public health. Fish Res J Philipp 1:52–56Google Scholar
  38. Williams EJ, Bunkley-Williams L (2000) Multicellular parasite (Macroparasite) problems in aquaculture. In: Stickney RR (ed) Encyclopedia of aquaculture. Wiley, New York, pp 562–579Google Scholar
  39. Williams H, Jones A (1994) Parasitic worms of fish. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams KC, Rimmer MA (2005) The future of feeds and feeding of marine finfish in the Asia-Pacific region: the need to develop alternative aquaculture feeds. Regional workshop on low value and ‘trash fish’ in the Asia-Pacific region. Hanoi, Vietnam, 7–9 June 2005:11Google Scholar
  41. Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BS, Jackson JBC, Lotze HK, Micheli F, Palumbi SR, Slekoe KA, Stachowicz JJ, Watson R (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Rückert
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sven Klimpel
    • 1
  • Saleh Al-Quraishy
    • 3
  • Heinz Mehlhorn
    • 1
  • Harry W. Palm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Zoomorphology, Cell Biology and ParasitologyHeinrich-Heine-University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Departments of Botany and ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Zoology, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations