Molecular identification of the Indian liver fluke, Fasciola (Trematoda: Fasciolidae) based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions
- 280 Downloads
- 14 Citations
Abstract
The species of liver flukes of the genus Fasciola (Platyhelminthes: Digenea: Fasciolidae) are obligate parasitic trematodes residing in the large biliary ducts of herbivorous mammals. While Fasciola hepatica has a cosmopolitan distribution, the other major species, i.e., Fasciola gigantica is reportedly prevalent in the tropical and subtropical regions of Africa and Asia. To determine the phylogenic location of Fasciola sp. of Assam (India) origin based on rDNA molecular data, ribosomal ITS regions were sequenced and compared with other species of trematodes in the family Fasciolidae. NCBI databases were used for sequence homology analysis using BLAST and ClustalW programs. The phylogenetic trees constructed based upon the ITS (1 and 2) sequences revealed a close relationship with isolates of F. gigantica from China, Indonesia, Japan, Egypt, and Zambia, the isolate from China with significant bootstrap values being the closest. Using the novel approach of molecular morphometrics that is based on ITS2 secondary structure homologies, phylogenetic relationships of the various isolates of fasciolid species have also been discussed. While comparing ITS1, the sequence of another Indian isolate designated as F. gigantica (accession no. EF198867) showed almost absolute match with F. hepatica. Hence, this particular isolate should be identified as F. hepatica and not F. gigantica.
Keywords
ITS2 Sequence Liver Fluke Indian Isolate Fascioliasis Adult FlukeNotes
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out under the “All India Co-ordinated Project on Capacity Building in Taxonomy: Research on Helminths,” sanctioned to VT by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, GOI; DBT Project to VT and AC; DSA (UGC-SAP) in Zoology and UGC’s UPE (Biosciences) program in the School of Life Sciences at NEHU, Shillong.
References
- Adlard RD, Barker SC, Blair D, Cribb TH (1993) Comparison of the second internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal DNA) from populations and species of Fasciolidae (Digenea). Int J Parasitol 23:423–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Billoud B, Guerrucci MA, Masselot M, Deutsch JS (2000) Cirripede phylogeny using a novel approach: molecular morphometrics. Mol Biol Evol 17:1435–1445PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP (1995) A molecular phylogeny of the human schistosomes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 4:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caetano-Anollés G (2002) Tracing the evolution of RNA structure in ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 30:2575–2587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grajales A, Aguilar C, Sánchez JA (2007) Phylogenetic reconstruction using secondary structures of Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2, rDNA): finding the molecular and morphological gap in Caribbean gorgonian corals. BMC Evol Biol 7:90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
- Hammond JA (1974) Human infection with liver fluke Fasciola gigantica. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 68:253–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillis DM, Dixon MT (1991) Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol 66:411–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang WY, He B, Wang CR, Zhu XQ (2004) Characterisation of Fasciola species from Mainland China by ITS-2 ribosomal DNA sequence. Vet Parasitol 120:75–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kostadinova A, Herniou EA, Barrett J, Littlewood DT (2003) Phylogenetic relationships of Echinostoma rudolphi, 1809 (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) and related genera re-assessed via DNA and morphological analysis. Syst Parasitol 54:159–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leon-Regagnon V, Brooks DR, Perez-Ponce de Leon G (1999) Differentiation of Mexican species of Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Plagiorchiformes): molecular and morphological evidence. J Parasitol 85:935–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lotfy WM, Hillyer GV (2003) Fasciola species in Egypt. Exp Pathol Parasitol 11:9–22Google Scholar
- Marcilla A, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S (2002) A PCR-RFLP assay for the distinction between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. Mol Cell Probes 16:327–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mas-Coma S, Esteban JG, Bargues MD (1999) Epidemiology of human fascioliasis: a review and proposed new classification. Bull World Health Organ 77:340–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mas-Coma S, Funatsu IR, Bargues MD (2001) Fasciola hepatica and lymnaeid snails occurring at very high altitude in South America. Parasitology 123:115–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD, Valero MA (2005) Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses. Int J Parasitol 35:1255–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyazaki I (1974) Lung flukes in the world. Morphology and life history. In: Sasa M (ed) A symposium on epidemiology of parasitic diseases. International Medicine Foundation of Japan, Tokyo, pp 101–135Google Scholar
- Morgan JAT, Blair D (1995) Nuclear rDNA ITS sequence variation in the trematode genus Echinostoma: an aid to establishing relationships within the 37-collar spine group. Parasitology 111:609–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prasad PK, Tandon V, Chatterjee A, Bandyopadhyay S (2007) PCR-based determination of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of ribosomal DNA of giant intestinal fluke, Fasciolopsis buski (Lankester, 1857) Looss, 1899. Parasitol Res 101:1581–1587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sambrooke J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
- Scholz T, Skerikova A, Shimazu T, Grygier MJ (2004) A taxonomic study of species of Bothriocephalus Rudolphi, 1808 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from eels in Japan: morphological and molecular evidence for the occurrence of B. claviceps (Goeze, 1782) and confirmation of the validity of B. japonicus Yamaguti, 1934. Syst Parasitol 57:87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schultz J, Maisel S, Gerlach D, Müller T, Wolf M (2005) A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2(ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 11:361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro BA (1998) An algorithm for comparing multiple RNA secondary structures. Comput Appl Biosci 4:387–393Google Scholar
- Tandon V, Prasad PK, Chatterjee A, Bhutia PT (2007) Surface fine topography and PCR-based determination of metacercaria of Paragonimus sp. from edible crabs in Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India. Parasitol Res 102:21–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighing, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tkach VV, Pawlowski J, Sharpilo VP (2000) Molecular and morphological differentiation between species of the Plagiorchis vespertilionis group (Digenea, Plagiorchiidae) occurring in European bats, with a re-description of P. vespertilionis group (Muller, 1780). Syst Parasitol 47:9–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- White BA (1993) PCR Protocols, current methods and applications, vol. 15. Humana, Totowa, NJGoogle Scholar
- Zuker M (1994) Prediction of RNA secondary structure by energy minimization. Methods Mol Biol 25:267–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuker M (2003) MFOLD web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zwieb C, Glotz C, Brimacombe R (1981) Secondary structure comparisons between small subunit ribosomal RNA molecules from six different species. Nucleic Acids Res 9:3621–3640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar