Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 103, Supplement 1, pp 65–68 | Cite as

Sandflies and leishmaniasis in Germany

Sand flies

Abstract

This study has provided evidence for the natural occurrence of sandflies in Germany. Two species belonging to the genus Phlebotomus were detected. Phlebotomus (Larroussius) perniciosus, a proven vector of leishmaniasis, was found in association with an autochthonous case of canine leishmaniasis near Kaiserslautern. Two hundred thirty-seven specimens of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii were caught in 17 different locations in Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate. The northernmost finding in Germany (and Europe) was near Cochem (Moselle). P. mascittii has not yet been confirmed as a vector of leishmaniasis, but its competence is strongly suspected. In addition to the detection of the vector, since 1991, there have been 11 cases of leishmaniasis in Germany in which an autochthonous origin was confirmed or which were highly likely to have been of indigenous origin. Data from the German meteorological service indicate that Germany currently has a Mediterranean climate, with an annual average temperature of 10°C being reached or exceeded in several regions. This type of climate is also appropriate for the living conditions of sandflies. Therefore, it is assumed that sandflies have a greater geographical distribution in Germany than the first studies suggested, being mainly restricted to the southern region of Baden-Wuerttemberg. The risk of an autochthonous canine infection occurring in Germany is very low. The rapidly increasing number of imported cases of leishmaniasis in dogs means that special attention must be focused on veterinary advice to dog owners about prophylaxis. The results indicate that the use of repellents and preventive behavioural measures is vital.

Keywords

Leishmaniasis Autochthonous Case Canine Leishmaniasis Autochthonous Origin Phlebotomine Sandfly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bogdan C, Schoenian G, Banuls AL, Hide M, Pratlong F, Lorenz E, Roellinghoff M, Mertens R (2001) Visceral leishmaniasis in a German child who had never entered a known endemic area: case report and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 32:302–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callot J (1950) Présence de Phlebotomus larroussei en Alsace. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 25:112Google Scholar
  3. Depaquit J, Naucke TJ, Schmitt C, Ferté H, Léger N (2005) A molecular analysis of the subgenus Transphlebotomus Artemiev, 1984 (Phlebotomus, Diptera, Psychodidae) inferred from ND4 mtDNA with new northern records of Phlebotomus mascittii Grassi, 1908. Parasitol Res 95:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galli-Valerio B (1912) Beobachtungen über Culiciden und Mitteilung über das Vorkommen von Phlebotomus papatasi (Scop.) im Kanton Waadt. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie 43:222–226Google Scholar
  5. Gothe R (1991) Leishmaniosen des Hundes in Deutschland: Erregerfauna und -biologie, Epidemiologie, Klinik, Pathogenese, Diagnose, Therapie und Prophylaxe. Kleintierpraxis 36:69–84Google Scholar
  6. Koehler K, Stechele M, Hetzel U, Domingo M, Schönian G, Zahner H, Burkhardt E (2002) Cutaneous leishmaniosis in a horse in southern Germany caused by Leishmania infantum. Vet Parasitol 109:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuhn GK (1999) Global warming and leishmaniasis in Italy. Bull Trop Med Int Health 7:1–2Google Scholar
  8. Lindgren E, Naucke TJ (2006) Leishmaniasis: Influences of climate and climate change. Epidemiology, ecology and adaptation measures. In: Menne B, Ebi KL (eds) Climate change and adaption strategies for human health. Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, pp 1–449Google Scholar
  9. Naucke TJ (2002) Leishmaniose, eine Tropenkrankheit und deren Vektoren (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) in Mitteleuropa. Denisia 184:163–178Google Scholar
  10. Naucke TJ (2007) Leishmaniasis—entering Germany. Tierärztliche Umschau 62:495–500Google Scholar
  11. Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Gruenewald HW (2006) Laboratory testing of the insect repellents IR3535® and DEET against Phlebotomus mascittii and P. duboscqi (Diptera: Psychodidae). Int J Med Microbiol 296(S1):230–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Naucke TJ, Pesson B (2000) Presence of Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi, 1908 (Diptera, Psychodidae) in Germany. Parasitol Res 86:335–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Naucke TJ, Schmitt C (2004) Is leishmaniasis becoming endemic in Germany? Int J Microbiol 293(Suppl. 37):179–181Google Scholar
  14. Péhu B (1931) Sur un cas de kala-azar survenu chez un enfant de 5 ans n’ayant jamais quitté les Vosges. Lyon Med 147:731–734Google Scholar
  15. Otranto D, Paradies P, Lia RP, Latrofa MS, Testini G, Cantacessi C, Mencke N, Galli G, Capelli G, Stanneck D (2007) Efficacy of a combination of 10% imidacloprid/ 50% permethrin for the prevention of leishmaniasis in kennelled dogs in an endemic area. Vet Parasitol 144:270–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmitt C (2002) Untersuchungen zur Biologie und Verbreitung von Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) mascittii Grassi 1908 (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Deutschland. Thesis, Institut für Medizinische Parasitologie, Universität BonnGoogle Scholar
  17. Vogel R (1931) Beobachtungen über blutsaugende Zweiflügler im Kanton Tessin. Zool. Anz. pp 1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Naucke
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Menn
    • 3
  • D. Massberg
    • 4
  • S. Lorentz
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (IMMIP)University Hospital BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Division of ParasitologyUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Zoomorphology, Cytology and ParasitologyHeinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Biology, Division of ZoologyKassel UniversityKasselGermany
  5. 5.NiederkasselGermany

Personalised recommendations