Parasitology Research

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 481–485 | Cite as

Field study on the efficacy of an extract of neem seed (Mite -Stop®) against the red mite Dermanyssus gallinae naturally infecting poultry in Egypt

  • Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar
  • Hassan M. Sobhy
  • Saleh Al-Quraishy
  • Margit Semmler
Original Paper


Infestations with the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae represent a major ectoparasite problem in poultry and affects egg and meat production worldwide. The effects of the neem seed product Mite-Stop® against the red poultry mite were investigated. Five primitive poultry farms in two small villages in the Nile Delta and Giza district were selected for the study. The neem extract was diluted 1:40 and 1:50 with tap water just prior to use. Application of the two dilutions of the provided product was performed to soil, cracks and crevices of the examined area as well as to mite-infested birds on day 0 and day 7. Two hours after treatment soil dust was collected from sprayed regions of the stable and from unsprayed control regions of the same stable. The treated chickens were also checked for mites 2 h after each treatment. The examination of the chickens 2 h after spraying showed that they were free of mites. The examination of treated soil with the Tullgren funnel apparatus 2 h after the first spraying on day 0 already showed a considerable reduction of living mites compared to controls. Seven days after the first treatment of the soil the number of living mites was reduced for 80% in the treated soil and decreased even more after the second spraying, since those larvae that had hatched from eggs in the meantime were killed. The 1:40 dilution of the neem seed extract with tap water was superior to the 1:50 dilution. These results clearly show a very high killing rate of the extract, if the mites come in direct contact with the compound. However, in order to obtain extinction also of hidden and freshly hatched stages repeated spraying should be done three times within 8–10 days.


Nile Delta Mite Population Poultry Farm Neem Seed Phoxim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work is supported by the Center of Excellence, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.


  1. Behan-Pelletier VM (1999) Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role for bioindication. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beugnet F, Chauve C, Gauthey M, Beert L (1997) Resistance of red poultry mite to pyrethroids in France. Vet Rec 140:577–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chauve C (1998) The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. Vet Parasitol 79:239–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hamscher G, Prieb B, Nau H (2007) Determination of phoxim residues in eggs by using high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detection after treatment of stocked housing facilities for the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae). Anal Chim Acta 586:330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hassanain MA, El-Garhy MF, Abdel-Ghaffar F, El-Sharaby A, Abdel-Megeed KN (1996) Biological control studies of soft and hard ticks in Egypt. The effect of Bacillus thuringiensis varieties on soft and hard ticks (Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 83:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoglund H, Nordenfors H, Uggla A (1995) Prevalence of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae, in different types of production systems for egg layers in Sweden. Poultry Sci 74:1793–1798Google Scholar
  7. Kautz T, Lo’pez-Fando C, Ellmer F (2006) Abundance and biodiversity of soil microarthropods as influenced by different types of organic manure in a long-term field experiment in Central Spain. Appl Soil Ecol 33:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundh J, Wiktelius D, Chiricio J (2005) Azadirachtin impregnated traps for control of Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol 130:337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maurer V, Baumgartner J (1994) A population for Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae). Exp Appl Acarol 18:409–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maurer V, Baumgartner J, Bieri M, Folsch DW (1993) The occurrence of the chicken mite Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) in Swiss poultry houses. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 66:87–97Google Scholar
  11. McKeen WD, Mullens BA, Rodriguez JL, Mandeville JD (1988) Bacillus thuringiensis exotoxin for Northern fowl mite control. Proc Western Poul Dis Conf 37:140–141Google Scholar
  12. Meyer-Kühling B, Pfister K, Mueller J, Heine J (2007) Field efficacy of phoxim 50% (ByeMiteÒ) against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae in battery cages stocked with laying hens. Vet Parasitol 147:289–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nordenfors H (2000) Epidemiology and control of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Ph D Thesis. Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Upsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordenfors H, Hoglund J, Uggla A (1996) Bekampning av det roda honskvalstret, Dermanyssus gallinae. Sven Veterinartidn 48:161–167Google Scholar
  15. Nordenfors H, Hoglund J, Tauson R, Chirico J (2001) Effect of permethrin impregnated plastic strips on Dermanyssus gallinae in loose-housing systems for laying hens. Vet Parasitol 102:121–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reynaud MC, Chauve C, Beugnet F (1997) Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): réproduction expérimentale du cycle et essai de traitement par la moxidectine et l’ivermectine. Rev Med Vet Toulouse 148:433–438Google Scholar
  17. Sutherland WJ (1998) Ecological census techniques(A hand book) WJ Sutherland, Univ. East Anglia. p 319Google Scholar
  18. Thind BB, Ford HL (2007) Assessment of susceptibility of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) to some acaricides using an adapted filter paper based bioassay. Vet Parasitol 144:344–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valiente-Moro C, Chauve C, Zenner L (2007) Experimental infection of Salmonella enteritidis by the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol 146:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vreeken-Buijs MJ, Hassink J Brussaard L (1998) Relationships of soil microarthropod biomass with organic matter and pore size distribution in soils under different land use. Soil Biol Biochem 30:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeman P, Stika V, Skalka B, Bartik M, Dusbabek F, Lavickova M (1982) Potential role of Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) in the circulation of the agent of pullurosis-typhus in hens. Folia Parasitol 29:371–374PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar
    • 1
  • Hassan M. Sobhy
    • 2
  • Saleh Al-Quraishy
    • 3
  • Margit Semmler
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Natural Resources Department, Institute of African Research and StudiesCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  3. 3.Zoology Department, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations