Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 401–411 | Cite as

Efficacy of various anticoccidials against experimental porcine neonatal isosporosis

  • H. C. Mundt
  • S. Mundt-Wüstenberg
  • A. Daugschies
  • A. Joachim
Original Paper

Abstract

The efficacies of 20 mg/kg body weight (BW) of toltrazuril (Toltra) 2 days post-infection (dpi), 2 mg/kg BW of diclazuril 2 and 3 dpi and 200 mg/kg BW of sulphadimidine 2, 3 and 4 dpi were compared in a model for piglet isosporosis. Weight gain (first 4 weeks of life) and diarrhoea and oocyst excretion from 4 to 11 dpi were evaluated (10–12 piglets/group). Additionally, animals were killed and examined for pathohistological changes of the small intestines 5, 7, 11 and 14 dpi (n = 3 per group and time point) and lengths of the intestinal villi. Diarrhoea (semi-liquid or liquid faeces) was seen from 5 dpi in all groups except Toltra, and the differences in prevalence and intensity of diarrhoea were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between Toltra and the other groups, which were similar (trial 1). Oocyst excretion was greatly reduced in the Toltra group, which was also statistically significant for the mean and median excretion rates and the percentage of excreting piglets between Toltra and the other groups (p < 0.05). Weight gain was highest in Toltra (p < 0.05). Histopathology revealed mostly villous necrosis and atrophy in the small intestines except the duodenum, which peaked at 7 dpi, in all groups except Toltra. Between 5 and 11 dpi, the Toltra group had significantly longer villi than the other groups. Reduced weight gain and diarrhoea caused by Isospora suis was controlled by a single application of Toltra in the pre-patent period, while neither diclazuril nor sulphadimidine improved the clinical picture of isosporosis.

Keywords

Coccidiosis Toltrazuril Halofuginone Sulphadimidine Oocyst Excretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. M. Becka, Bayer AG, for support with the statistical evaluation and Drs. M. Rinke and M. Rosenbruch, Bayer AG, for support with the pathomorphological studies and microphotographs.

References

  1. Alzieu JP, Mage C, Maes L, de Muelenaere C (1999) Economic benefits of prophylaxis with diclazuril against subclinical coccidiosis in lambs reared indoors. Vet Rec 144:442–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach U, Kalthoff V, Mundt HC, Popp A, Rinke M, Daugschies A, Lüttge B (2003) Parasitological and morphological findings in porcine isosporosis after treatment with symmetrical triazinones. Parasitol Res 91:27–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conway DP, Mathis GF, Johnson J, Schwartz M, Baldwin C (2001) Efficacy of diclazuril in comparison with chemical and ionophorous anticoccidials against Eimeria spp. in broiler chickens in floor pens. Poult Sci 80:426–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Greif G (2000) Immunity to coccidiosis after treatment with toltrazuril. Parasitol Res 86:787–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hackstein JHP, Mackenstedt U, Mehlhorn H, Meijernik JP, Schubert H (1995) Parasitic apicomplexans harbour a chlorophyll a-D1 complex, the potential target for the therapeutic triazines. Parasitol Res 81:207–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harder A, Haberkorn A (1989) Possible mode of action of toltrazuril: studies on two Eimeria species and mammalian and Ascaris suum enzymes. Parasitol Res 76:8–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harleman JH, Meyer RC (1984) Life cycle of Isospora suis in gnotobiotic and conventionalised piglets. Vet Parasitol 17:27–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Higgins RJ (1988) Coccidiosis—an emerging disease of young pigs. Vet Annu 24:86–90Google Scholar
  9. Joachim A, Ruttkowski B, Zimmermann M, Daugschies A, Mundt HC (2004) Detection of Isospora suis (Biester and Murray 1934) in piglet faeces—comparison of microscopy and PCR. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 51:140–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalthoff V (2001) Untersuchungen zur Wirksamkeit von Ponazuril (Bay Vi 9143) gegen Isospora suis beim Saugferkel. Vet med Thesis, FU BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Keidel J (2005) Wirksamkeit von 0,25% Diclazuril (Vecoxan) bei Kälberkokzidiose. Vet Med Rep 6:8Google Scholar
  12. Lindsay DS (1989) Diagnosing and controlling Isospora suis in nursing piglets. Vet Med 84:443–448Google Scholar
  13. Lindsay DS, Current WL, Ernst JV (1982) Sporogony of Isospora suis Biester, 1934 of swine. J Parasitol 68:861–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL, Powe TA (1992) Enteric coccidial infections and coccidiosis in swine. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 14:698–702Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd S, Smith J (2006) Activity of toltrazuril and diclazuril against Isospora species in kittens and puppies. Vet Rec 21:509–511Google Scholar
  16. Matuschka FR, Männer K (1981) Die Entwicklung experimentell mit Isospora suis infizierter Absatzferkel als Modellfall für die Wirksamkeit von Lasalocid und Halofuginon auf Kokzidien. Zentralbl Bakteriol A 248:565–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehlhorn H, Ortmann-Falkenstein G, Haberkorn A (1984) The effects of sym. triazinones on developmental stages of Eimeria tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina: a light and electron microscopical study. Z Parasitenkd 70:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer C, Joachim A, Daugschies A (1999) Occurrence of Isospora suis in larger piglet production units and on specialized piglet rearing farms. Vet Parasitol 82:277–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mundt HC, Cohnen A, Daugschies A, Joachim A, Prosl H, Schmäschke R, Westphal BJ (2005) Occurrence of Isospora suis in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 52:93–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mundt HC, Joachim A, Becka M, Daugschies A (2006) Isospora suis: an experimental model for mammalian intestinal coccidiosis. Parasitol Res 98:167–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Niestrath M, Takla M, Joachim A, Daugschies A (2002) The role of Isospora suis as a pathogen in conventional piglet production in Germany. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 49:176–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Platzer B, Prosl H, Cieslicki M, Joachim A (2005) Epidemiology of Eimeria infections in an Austrian milking sheep flock and control with diclazuril. Vet Parasitol 129:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raether W (1988) Chemotherapy and other control measures of parasitic diseases in domestic animals and man. In: Mehlhorn H (ed) Parasitology in focus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 740–766Google Scholar
  24. Robinson Y, Morin M, Girard C, Higgins R (1983) Experimental transmission of intestinal coccidiosis to piglets: clinical, parasitological and pathological findings. Can J Comp Med 47:401–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruzicka CW, Andrews JJ (1983) Porcine neonatal coccidiosis: a clinical review. Iowa State Univ Vet 45:90–95Google Scholar
  26. Steinfelder S, Lucius R, Greif G, Pogonka T (2005) Treatment of mice with the anticoccidial drug toltrazuril does not interfere with the development of a specific cellular intenstinal immune response to Eimeria falciformis. Parasitol Res 97:458–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuart BP, Lindsay DS, Ernst JV, Gosser HS (1980) Isospora suis enteritis in piglets. Vet Pathol 17:84–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuart BP, Gosser HS, Allen CB, Bedell DM (1982) Coccidiosis in swine: dose and age response to Isospora suis. Can J Comp Med 46:317–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vítovec J, Koudela B (1987a) Pathology of natural isosporosis in nursing piglets. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 34:199–204Google Scholar
  30. Vítovec J, Koudela B (1987b) Reduced pre-patend period in experimental infection of piglets with the coccidium Isospora suis. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 34:10Google Scholar
  31. Vítovec J, Koudela B (1990) Double alteration of the small intestine in conventional and gnotobiotic piglets experimentally infected with the coccidium Isospora suis (Apicomplexa, Eimeriidae). Folia Parasitol (Praha) 37:21–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. C. Mundt
    • 1
  • S. Mundt-Wüstenberg
    • 1
  • A. Daugschies
    • 2
  • A. Joachim
    • 3
  1. 1.Bayer HealthCare AG, Animal HealthClinical DevelopmentLeverkusenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Parasitology and Zoology, Department of PathobiologyUniversity of Veterinary Medicine ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations