Advertisement

Tropical freshwater sponges develop from gemmules faster than their temperate-region counterparts

  • Ludimila CalheiraEmail author
  • Emilio Lanna
  • Ulisses Pinheiro
Original Paper

Abstract

Gemmules are asexual reproductive structures, with internal cells that migrate through an opening in the process of germination, and start to differentiate to form a functional sponge. They have been used as models to understand the physiology and biology of freshwater sponges, but these studies were carried out only in a restricted group of sponges from the temperate region. Therefore, detailed studies describing the developmental stages of freshwater sponges, especially belonging to other lineages and localities, are still necessary to understand how the sponges are formed from gemmules. Here, we describe the development during gemmule germination of two neotropical freshwater sponges, Radiospongilla inesi and Heteromeyenia cristalina. We classified the development of both species in five stages based on phenotypic characteristics. Differences in the developmental stages between the studied species were observed, suggesting that development is species specific. Moreover, when comparing the development of the tropical freshwater sponges with their temperate counterparts, we found differences in the timing of the stages, especially in the formation of the juvenile sponge. Therefore, the tropical species have a similar, but faster development.

Keywords

Developmental stages Resistant bodies Neotropical region Porifera Spongillidae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dra. Ana C.S. Almeida (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil), M. Sc. Elielton Nascimento (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil) and M.Sc. Loyana Docio (Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Brazil) for logistical support.

Funding

This study was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. Beside that, the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support in our labs.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and they agree to the submission of the manuscript and the corresponding author has been authorized by all co-authors.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Necessary permits for the field studies, including sampling and laboratory procedures, were obtained (Permit Number 18100-1 SISBIO/Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservaçao da Biodiversidade). Reported localities do not include protected areas. And, all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Benfey TJ, Reiswig HM (1982) Temperature, pH, and photoperiod effects upon gemmule hatching in the freshwater sponge, Ephydatia mulleri (Porifera, Spongillidae). J Exp Zool 221:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402210104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VN, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-9000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Da Hora J, Cavalcanti FF, Lanna E (2018) Anatomy and ultrastructure of the tropical sponge Cladocroce caelum (Haplosclerida, Demospongiae). J Morphol 279:1872–1886.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott GRD, Leys SP (2007) Coordinated contractions effectively expel water from the aquiferous system of a freshwater sponge. J Exp Biol 210:3736–3748.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.003392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ereskovsky AV (2010) The comparative embryology of sponges. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Funayama N (2008) Chapter 2: stem cell system of sponge. In: Bosch TCG (ed) Stem cells: from hydra to man, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands, pp 17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Funayama N, Nakatsukasa M, Hayashi T, Agata K (2005) Isolation of the choanocyte in the freshwater sponge, Ephydatia fluviatilis and its lineage marker, Ef annexin. Dev Growth Differ 47:243–253.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2005.00800.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert JJ (1975) Field experiments on gemmulation in the fresh-water sponge Spongilla lacustris. Trans Am Microsc Soc 94:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Imsiecke G, Steffen R, Custodio M, Borojevic R, Muller W (1995) Formation of spicules by sclerocytes from the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri in short-term cultures in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 31:528–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02634030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanna E, Cajado B, Santos D, Cruz F, Oliveira F, Vasconcellos V (2018) Outlook on sponge reproduction science in the last ten years: are we far from where we should be? Invertebr Reprod Dev 10:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3562-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ludeman DA, Farrar N, Riesgo A, Paps J, Leys SP (2014) Evolutionary origins of sensation in metazoans: functional evidence for a new sensory organ in sponges. BMC Evol Biol 14:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manconi R, Pronzato R (2007) Gemmules as a key structure for the adaptive radiation of freshwater sponges: a morphofunctional and biogeographic study. In: Custódio MR, Hajdu E, Lobo-Hadju G, Muricy G (eds) Porifera research: biodiversity, innovation and sustainability, 1st edn. Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, pp 61–77Google Scholar
  13. Manconi R, Pronzato R (2015) Chapter 3: Phylum Porifera. In: Thorp J, Rogers DC (eds) Keys to Nearctic fauna: thorp and covich’s freshwater invertebrates, 4th edn. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 39–83Google Scholar
  14. Manconi R, Pronzato R (2016) How to survive and persist in temporary freshwater? Adaptive traits of sponges (Porifera: Spongillida): a review. Hydrobiologia 782:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2714-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muricy G, Lopes DA, Hajdu E, Carvalho MS, Moraes FC, Klautau M, Menegola C, Pinheiro U (2011) Catalogue of Brazilian Porifera. Museu Nacional, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  16. Nicacio G, Pinheiro U (2015) Biodiversity of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillina) from northeast Brazil: new species and notes on systematics. Zootaxa 3981:220–240.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3981.2.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicacio G, Severi W, Pinheiro U (2011) New species of Radiospongilla (Porifera: Spongillidae) from Brazilian inland waters. Zootaxa 3132:56–63.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3132.1.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinheiro U, Hajdu E, Correia MD (2004) First description of gemmules of Ephydatia facunda Weltner, 1895 (Porifera, Haplosclerida, Spongillidae) by scanning eléctron microscopy, with underwater observations of a large population from north-eastern Brazil. J Nat Hist 38:1071–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0022293031000064404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinheiro U, Calheira L, Hajdu E (2015) A new species of freshwater sponge, Heteromeyenia barlettai sp. nov. from an aquarium in São Paulo, Brazil (Spongillida: Spongillidae). Zootaxa 4034:351–363.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4034.2.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R Developmental Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
  21. Reiswig HM, Frost TM, Ricciardi A (2009) Porifera. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 4th edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 91–123Google Scholar
  22. Rivera A, Winters I, Rued A, Ding S, Posfai D, Cieniewicz B, Cameron K, Gentile K, Hilla A (2013) The evolution and function of the Pax/Six regulatory network in sponges. Evol Dev 15:186–196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santos EM, Fell PE (1996) Distribution and ecology of freshwater sponges in Connecticut. Hydrobiologia 341:81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simpson TL (1984) The cell biology of sponges. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simpson TL, Gilbert JJ (1973) Gemmulation, gemmule hatching, and sexual reproduction in fresh-water sponges I. The life cycle of Spongilla lacustris and Tubella pennsylvanica. Trans Am Microsc Soc 92:422–433.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3225246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper JNA, Rtzler K, De Voogd NJ, Alvarez B, Hajdu E, Pisera AB, Manconi R, Schoenberg C, Janussen D, Tabachnick KR, Klautau M, Picton B, Kelly M, Vacelet J, Dohrmann M, Diaz CM, Cardenas P (2019) World Porifera Database. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/. Accessed 08 May 2019
  27. Windsor PJ, Leys SP (2010) Wnt signaling and induction in the sponge aquiferous system: evidence for an ancient origin of the organizer. Evol Dev 12:484–493.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00434.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yin Z, Zhua M, Davidson EH, Bottjer DJ, Zhao F, Tafforeau F (2015) Sponge grade body fossil with cellular resolution dating 60 Myr before the Cambrian. PNAS 112:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414577112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Biologia, Campus de OndinaUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations