Microscopic aspects of the nictitating membrane in Carcharhinidae and Sphyrnidae sharks: a preliminary study
- 200 Downloads
The nictitating membrane is an anatomic structure exclusively exhibited by Carcharhiniformes, the largest order among sharks. Here we present a detailed description of morphological characteristics of the nictitating membrane through light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in the following shark species: Carcharhinus limbatus, Galeocerdo cuvier, Prionace glauca, Rhizoprionodon lalandii, R. porosus, Sphyrna lewini and S. zygaena. Differences in the microscopic aspects of dermal denticles from the species studied were observed. P. glauca, a pelagic shark, showed a well-developed protection apparatus when compared with other pelagic species, while coastal sharks showed even higher structural complexity. In the blue shark the denticles are enameled, presenting an extensive pulp cavity and a base inserted in a connective tissue. Moreover, the species exhibits the higher number of ridges (up to nine) of varied size and shape and the muscular tissue is inserted in the ventral region of the connective tissue. Dermal denticles from C. limbatus, R. lalandii, R. porosus, S. zygaena and G. cuvier exhibit up to five ridges with hexagonal ornamentations in the crown. In S. lewini and S. zygaena, the denticles are rounded shaped and glandular cells are present. The patterns observed in the present study suggest a high level of specialization and evolutionary conservation shaped by the function of the structure. In addition, we hypothesize that the morphological simplification observed in the membrane when compared to the dermal denticles from the skin, is an evolutionary trait that evolved to improve the dynamic and biomechanics of this highly mobile structure allowing this way, a rapid and efficient protection against abrasion, mainly during predation events.
KeywordsNictitating membrane Dermal denticles Requiem sharks Electron microscopy
We would like to thank CAPES (granted ANP and NW) for the support, the postgraduate program of Department of Surgery, Faculty of the Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo and the funding provided by FAPESP through contract number 2016/09095-2 (Granted to BRS).
- Cappetta H (1987) Chondrichthyes II. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. Gustav Fischer, New York, pp 1–193Google Scholar
- Ciena AP, Rangel BS, Bruno CEM, Miglino MA, Amorim AF, Rici REG, Watanabe I (2015) Morphological aspects of oral denticles in the Sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon lalandii (Muller and Henle, 1839) (Elasmobranchii, Carcharhinidae). Anat Histol Embryol 45:109–114. DOI: 10.1111/ahe.12178 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Compagno LJV (1988) Sharks of the order carcharhiniformes. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p 572Google Scholar
- COMPAGNO LJV (2005) Checklist of living Chondrichthyes. In: Hamlett WC (eds) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids and chimaeras. Science Publishes, Inc, United States, pp 501–548Google Scholar
- Danylchuk AJ, Suski CD, Mandelman JW, Murchie KJ, Haak CR, Brooks AML, Cook SJ (2014) Hooking injury, physiological status and short-term mortality of juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion bevirostris) following catch-and-release recreational angling. Conser Physiol. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cot036 Google Scholar
- Hueter RE, Mann DA, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Demski LS (2004) Sensory biology of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 325–368Google Scholar
- Kemp NE (1999) Integumentary system and teeth. In: Hamlett WC (ed) Sharks, skates and rays: the biology of elasmobranch fishes. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 43–68Google Scholar
- Marshall LJ (2011) The fin blue line: Quantifying fishing mortality using shark fin morphology. Dissertation, University of TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
- Reif WE (1978) Protective and hydrodynamic function of the dermal skeleton of elasmobranchs. Neues Jahrbuch Für Geologie Und Paläontologie 157:33–141Google Scholar