Advertisement

Zoomorphology

, Volume 135, Issue 1, pp 43–50 | Cite as

New multivariate image analysis method for detection of differences in chemical and structural composition of chitin structures in tardigrade feeding apparatuses

  • Aleksandar G. Savic
  • Søren Preus
  • Lorena Rebecchi
  • Roberto Guidetti
Original Paper

Abstract

The feeding apparatus of the eutardigrade Paramacrobiotus richtersi was examined with confocal laser scanning microscopy using three different wavelengths, taking advantage of the autofluorescence of the chitin present in its structures. The main goal was to test new method based on multivariate image analysis for detection of differences in the chemical and structural composition of chitin structures and the relationships between chemical structure and physical properties of feeding structures. The collected images were analyzed using factor analysis under the self-developed MATLAB-based software ImageA. It was possible to observe small differences in chitin composition using the variations (shifts) of emission spectra caused by differences in the microenvironment of chitin fluorophore. Images of feeding apparatuses within the body and discharged by the animal during molt were recorded applying three excitation/emission (ex/em) sets and then analyzed using factor analysis with three methods for rotation of factor scores (without rotation, with orthogonal rotation, and oblique rotation). With this procedure, it was proven that chitin organization in the feeding apparatus of tardigrades is not homogeneous, but changes according to the mechanical and structural requirements of the structures. Besides the new knowledge about the tardigrade feeding apparatus, ImageA was also proven to be reliable and applicable tool for various problems in the analysis of multispectral images, as autofluorescence images are generally considered as difficult to analyze due to the small initial set of input data and high correlation among the images observed at different ex/em wavelengths.

Keywords

Buccopharyngeal apparatus Chitin Factor analysis Paramacrobiotus richtersi Tardigrade 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by short-term fellowship provided by Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS) and project funded by Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development III43010. The research is also part of the project “Environments, food and health” granted by the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy).

Supplementary material

435_2015_295_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
435_2015_295_MOESM2_ESM.rar (4.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (RAR 4684 kb)

References

  1. Bussers JC, Jeuniaux C (1973) Chitinous cuticle and systematic position of Tardigrada. Biochem Systemat Ecol 1(1):7–78. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(73)90040-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Degma P, Bertolani R, Guidetti R (2015) Actual checklist of Tardigrada species, p 40. http://www.tardigrada.modena.unimo.it/miscellanea/Actual%20checklist%20of%20Tardigrada.pdf. Accessed 09 July 2015
  3. Greven H, Peters W (1986) Localization of chitin in the cuticle of Tardigrada using wheat germ agglutinin—gold conjugate as a specific electron-dense marker. Tissue Cell 18(2):297–304. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(86)90037-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guidetti R, Bertolani R (2005) Tardigrade taxonomy: an updated check list of the taxa and a list of characters used in their identification. Zootaxa 845:1–46Google Scholar
  5. Guidetti R, Altiero T, Rebecchi L (2011) On dormancy strategies in tardigrades. J Insect Physiol 57(5):567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Guidetti R, Altiero T, Marchioro T, Amade LS, Avdonina AM, Bertolani R, Rebecchi L (2012) Form and function of the feeding apparatus in Eutardigrada (Tardigrada). Zoomorphology 131(2):127–148. doi: 10.1007/s00435-012-0149-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guidetti R, Bertolani R, Rebecchi L (2013) Comparative analysis of the tardigrade feeding apparatus: adaptive convergence and evolutionary pattern of the piercing stylet system. J Limnol 72:24–35. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2013.s1.e4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guidetti R, Bonifacio A, Altiero T, Bertolani R, Rebecchi L (2015) Distribution of calcium and chitin in the tardigrade feeding apparatus in relation to its function and morphology. Integr Comp Biol 55(2):241–252. doi: 10.1093/icb/icv008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hendrickson AE, White PO (1964) Promax: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Br J Math Stat Psy 17(1):65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahn E, Lizard G, Pélégrini M, Frouin F, Roignot P, Chardonnet Y, Di Paola R (1999) Four-dimensional factor analysis of confocal image sequences (4D-FAMIS) to detect and characterize low copy numbers of human papillomavirus DNA by FISH in HeLa and SiHa cells. J Microsc 193(3):227–243. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00435.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaiser HF (1958) The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23(3):187–200. doi: 10.1007/BF02289233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Møbjerg N, Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, Persson D, Bjørn M, Ramløv H, Kristensen RM (2011) Survival in extreme environments—on the current knowledge of adaptations in tardigrades. Acta Physiol 202:409–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02252.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pfannkuchen M, Bruemmer F, Schill RO (2007) 3-Dimensional reconstruction of fluorescent structures in tardigrades. J Limnol 66(1s):158–163. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2007.s1.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP (2009) Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci 34(7):641–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Riitters KH, O’neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10(1):23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wełnicz W, Grohme Kaczmarek Ł, Schill RO, Frohme M (2011) Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades—the last decade. J Insect Physiol 57:577–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.03.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandar G. Savic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Søren Preus
    • 3
  • Lorena Rebecchi
    • 4
  • Roberto Guidetti
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Multidisciplinary ResearchUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.LAboratoire de Spectrochimie Infrarouge et Raman (LASIR) – UMR 8516Université de Lille, Sciences et TechnologiesVilleneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center – iNANOAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Life SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations