Advertisement

Zoomorphology

, Volume 133, Issue 1, pp 83–98 | Cite as

Comparative anatomy of the heart–glomerulus complex of Cephalodiscus gracilis (Pterobranchia): structure, function, and phylogenetic implications

  • Sebastian Merker
  • Alexander Gruhl
  • Thomas StachEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Cephalodiscus gracilis Harmer, 1905 is a semi-sessile deuterostome that shares with fish-like chordates pharyngeal gill slits and a dorsally situated brain. In order to reveal structures potentially homologous among deuterostomes and to infer their functional roles, we investigated the axial complex, associated blood vessels and structures of C. gracilis using transmission electron microscopy, light microscopy, and digital 3D reconstructions. We describe the smooth, bipartite cephalic shield retractor muscles that originate as solid compact muscles and fan out to traverse the protocoel as individual muscle cells. The axial complex consists of a cap-shaped coelomic sac, the pericardium that surrounds the central heart. The pericardium is constituted of myoepithelial cells, with the cells facing the heart being thicker and richer in myofilaments. A prominent dorsal median blood vessel opens into the heart, which gives rise to a short median ventral vessel that opens into the paired glomeruli connected to the ventral side of the stomochord. The tip of the curved stomochord rests precisely above the connection of the dorsal median vessel with the heart, a position that would allow the stomochord to function as a valve facilitating unidirectional blood flow. Glomeruli are lined by podocytes of the spacious protocoel and are considered to be the site of ultrafiltration. Two pairs of blood vessels enter the median dorsal blood vessel from the tentacles. The median dorsal blood vessel is separated from the brain by a thin basement membrane. This arrangement is consistent with the hypothesis that blood vessels in the tentacles increase oxygen supply for the brain. Based on detailed similarities, the heart–glomerulus complex of C. gracilis is considered homologous with the heart–glomerulus complex in Rhabdopleura spp., and Enteropneusta, and the axial complex in Echinodermata. In addition, we hypothesize homology to the excretory complex including Hatschek’s nephridium in Cephalochordata. Thus, the heart–glomerulus complex does not support a sister-group relationship between Echinodermata and Hemichordata, whereas the organization of the cephalic shield retractor muscles is consistent with the evolution of pterobranchs within enteropneusts.

Keywords

Stomochord Trimery Protocoel Ambulacraria Hemichordata 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG grants: Sta 655/2-1&2 (Deep Metazoan Phylogeny Priority Program) and Sta 655/4-1) and the financial support of the Biological Institute of Ocean Sciences (Grants-in-Aid Program).

Supplementary material

435_2013_200_MOESM1_ESM.zip (54.3 mb)
Aligned stack of light micrographs of complete series of longitudinal sections is deposited on MorphDBase.de: MDB Acc.-No.: T_Stach_20130322-M-3.1 (ZIP 55605 kb)

Movie of light micrographs of complete series of longitudinal sections is deposited on MorphDBase.de: MDB Acc.-No.: T_Stach_EDIT-M-4.1 (AVI 52404 kb)

Movie of light micrographs of complete series of cross sections is deposited on MorphDBase.de: MDB Acc.-No.: T_Stach_EDIT-M-6.1 (AVI 66525 kb)

435_2013_200_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (518 kb)
3D-pdf-version of Figure 10 is also deposited on MorphDBase.de (3D-features accessible in Adobe Reader 9.0 and higher): MDB Acc.-No.: T_Stach_EDIT-M-5.1 (PDF 518 kb)

References

  1. Aiello LC, Wheeler P (1995) The expensive-tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Curr Anthropol 36(2):199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt D, Nübler-Jung K (1995) Inversion of dorsoventral axis? Nature 371:26Google Scholar
  3. Arendt D, Nübler-Jung K (1999) Comparison of early nerve cord development in insects and vertebrates. Development 126:2309–2325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ax P (2001) Das System der Metazoa: ein Lehrbuch der phylogenetischen Systematik. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Balser E, Ruppert E (1990) Structure, ultrastructure, and function of the preoral heart-kidney in Saccoglossus kowalevskii (Hemichordata, Enteropneusta) including new data on the stomochord. Acta Zool 71:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benito J, Pardos F (1997) Hemichordata. In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 15–101Google Scholar
  7. Cameron CB (2005) A phylogeny of the hemichordates based on morphological characters. Can J Zool 83:196–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannon JT, Rychel AL, Eccleston H, Halanych KM, Swalla BJ (2009) Molecular phylogeny of hemichordata, with updated status of deep-sea enteropneusts. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52(1):17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caron J-B, Conway Morris S, Shu D (2010) Tentaculate fossils from the Cambrian of Canada (British Columbia) and China (Yunnan) interpreted as primitive deuterostomes. PLoS One 5(3):e9586PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caron J-B, Morris SC, Cameron CB (2013) Tubicolous enteropneusts from the Cambrian period. Nature advance online publicationGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerfontaine P (1906) Recherches sur le développment de l’Amphioxus. Archives de Biologie 22:229–418Google Scholar
  12. Clark RB (1964) Dynamics in the metazoan evolution. The origin of the coelom and segments. Oxford, ClarendonGoogle Scholar
  13. Conklin EG (1932) The embryology of amphioxus. J Morphol 54:69–151Google Scholar
  14. De Robertis EM, Kuroda H (2004) Dorsal-ventral patterning and neural induction in Xenopus embryos. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:285–308PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Robertis EM, Sasai Y (2000) A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380:37–40Google Scholar
  16. Dilly PN (1985) The habitat and behavior of Cephalodiscus gracilis (Pterobranchia: Hemichordata) from Bermuda. J Zool 230:63–67Google Scholar
  17. Dilly PN, Welsch U, Rehkämper G (1986) Fine structure of heart, pericardium and glomerular vessel in Cephalodiscus gracilis M’Intosh, 1882 (Pterobranchia, Hemichordata). Acta Zool 67(3):173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn C, Hejnol A, Matus D, Pang K, Browne W, Smith S, Seaver E, Rouse G, Obst M, Edgecombe G, Sorensen M, Haddock S, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen R, Wheeler W, Martindale M, Giribet G (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745–749Google Scholar
  19. Edgecombe G, Giribet G, Dunn C, Hejnol A, Kristensen R, Neves R, Rouse G, Worsaae K, Sørensen M (2011) Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Org Divers Evol 11:151–172Google Scholar
  20. Fauchald K (1974) Polychaete phylogeny: a problem in protostome evolution. Syst Biol 23(4):493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franz V (1925) Morphologische und ontogenetische Akranierstudien über Darm, Trichter, Zölomderivate, Muskulatur- und Bindegewebsformationen. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft 61:407–468Google Scholar
  22. Franz V (1927) Morphologie der Akranier. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Anatomie 27(III. Abt.):464–692Google Scholar
  23. Garstang W (1928) The morphology of the Tunicata, and its bearings on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Q J Microscopical Sci 72:51–187Google Scholar
  24. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire E (1822) Considerations generales sur la vertebre. Mem Mus d’Hist Nat 9:89–119Google Scholar
  25. Gudo M, Syed T (2008) 100 years of Deuterostomia (GROBBEN, 1908): cladogenetic and anagenetic relations within the Notoneuralia domain. ArXiv PublicationGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutmann WF (1981) Relationships between invertebrate phyla based on functional-mechanical analysis of the hydrostatic skeleton. Am Zool 21:63–81Google Scholar
  27. Holland ND, Holland LZ (2006) Stage- and tissue-specific patterns of cell division in embryonic and larval tissues of amphioxus during normal development. Evol Dev 8(2):142–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaul-Strehlow S, Stach T (2011) The pericardium in the deuterostome Saccoglossus kowalevskii (Enteropneusta) develops from the ectoderm via schizocoely. Zoomorphology 130:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kriebel ME (1967) Conduction velocity and intracellular action potentials of the tunicate heart. J Gen Physiol 50(8):2097–2107PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lankester ER (1877) Notes on the embryology and classification of the animal kingdom: comprising a revision of speculations relative to the origin and significance of the germ-layers. Q J Microscopic Sci 17:399–454Google Scholar
  31. Lapraz F, Besnardeau L, Lepage T (2009) Patterning of the dorsal-ventral axis in echinoderms: insights into the evolution of the BMP-chordin signaling network. PLoS Biol 7:e1000248Google Scholar
  32. Lester SM (1985) Cephalodiscus sp. (Hemichordata: Pterobranchia): observations of functional morphology, behavior and occurrence in shallow water around Bermuda. Mar Biol 85:263–268Google Scholar
  33. Lowe CJ, Terasaki M, Wu M, Freeman Jr. RM, Runft L, Kwan K, Haigo S, Aronowicz J, Lander E, Gruber C, Smith M, Kirschner M, Gerhart J (2006) Dorsoventral patterning in hemichordates: insights into early chordate evolution. PLoS Biol 4:e291Google Scholar
  34. Malakhov VV (1977) The problem of the basic structural plan in various groups of Deuterostomia. Zhurnal Obshey Biologii 38:485–499Google Scholar
  35. Mayer G, Bartolomaeus T (2003) Ultrastructure of the stomochord and the heart-glomerulus complex in Rhabdopleura compacta (Pterobranchia): phylogenetic implications. Zoomorphology 122:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metschnikoff V (1881) Über die systematische Stellung von Balanoglossus. Zool Anz 4:139–157Google Scholar
  37. Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielsen C (2001) Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, New York, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielsen C (2012) Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 402Google Scholar
  40. Nübler-Jung K, Arendt D (1994) Is ventral in insects dorsal in vertebrates? Roux's Arch Dev Biol 203:357–366Google Scholar
  41. Nübler-Jung K, Arendt D (1999) Dorsoventral axis inversion: enteropneust anatomy links invertebrates to chordates turned upside down. J Zool Syst Evol Res 37:93–100Google Scholar
  42. Perseke M, Hetmank J, Bernt M, Stadler P, Schlegel M, Bernhard D (2011) The enigmatic mitochondrial genome of Rhabdopleura compacta (Pterobranchia) reveals insights into selection of an efficient tRNA system and supports monophyly of Ambulacraria. BMC Evol Biol 11:134Google Scholar
  43. Peterson KJ, Cameron RA, Tagawa K, Satoh N, Davidson EH (1999) A comparative molecular approach to mesodermal patterning in basal deuterostomes: the expression pattern of Brachyury in the enteropneust hemichordate Ptychodera flava. Development 126:85–95Google Scholar
  44. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, Wallberg A, Peterson KJ, Telford MJ (2011) Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470:255–258Google Scholar
  45. Rähr H (1979) The circulatory system of amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas): a light-microscopic investigation based on intravascular injection technique. Acta Zool 60:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ridewood WG (1907) Pterobranchia: Cephalodiscus. National Antarctic expedition 1901-4 discovery reports—natural history. British Museum, London, pp 1–67Google Scholar
  47. Ritter WE (1902) The movements of the Enteropneusta and the mechanism by which they are accomplished. Biol Bull 3(6):255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruppert EE (1996) Morphology of Hatschek's nephridium in larval and juvenile stages of Branchiostoma virginiae (Cephalochordata). Isr J Zool 42:161–182Google Scholar
  49. Ruppert EE (1997a) Cephalochordata (Acrania). In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates Hemichordata, Chaetognatha, and the invertebrate chordates. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 349–504Google Scholar
  50. Ruppert EE (1997b) Introduction: microscopic anatomy of the notochord, heterochrony, and chordate evolution. In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Hemichordata, Chaetognatha, and the invertebrate chordates, vol 15. Willey-Liss, Incorporation, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  51. Ruppert EE (2005) Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies? Can J Zool 83:8–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Satoh N, Tagawa K, Takahashi H (2012) How was the notochord born? Evol Dev 14(1):56–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Schepotieff A (1907) Die Pterobranchier. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Anatomie 23:463–534, Tafeln 425–433Google Scholar
  54. Schmidt-Rhaesa A (2007) The evolution of organ systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Skramlik E (1938a) Über den Kreislauf bei den niederen Chordaten. Ergebnisse der Biologie 15:166–308Google Scholar
  56. Skramlik Ev (1938b) Vorgänge im Kreislaufsystem von Amphioxus lanceolatus Y. Reichsstelle für den Unterrichtsfilm Film C 267, issue 3, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  57. Stach T (1998) Coelomic cavities may function as a vascular system in amphioxus larvae. Biol Bull 195:260–263Google Scholar
  58. Stach T (2000) Microscopic anatomy of developmental stages of Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Cephalochordata, Chordata). Bonn Zool Monogr 47:1–111Google Scholar
  59. Stach T (2002) Minireview: on the homology of the protocoel in Cephalochordata and ‘lower’ Deuterostomia. Acta Zool 83:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stach T (2008) Chordate phylogeny and evolution: a not so simple three-taxon problem. J Zool 276:117–141Google Scholar
  61. Stach T (2013) Deuterorstome phylogeny—a morphological perspective. In: Wägele W, Bartolomaeus T (eds) Deep metazoan phylogeny: the backbone of the tree of life. De Gruyter, Berlin (accepted)Google Scholar
  62. Stach T, Eisler K (1998) The ontogeny of the nephridial system of the larval amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum). Acta Zool 79(2):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Struck TH (2011) Direction of evolution within Annelida and the definition of Pleistoannelida. J Zool Syst Evol Res 49:340–345Google Scholar
  64. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hosel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, Bleidorn C (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95–98Google Scholar
  65. Swalla B, Smith A (2008) Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:1557–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Takacs CM, Moy VN, Peterson KJ (2002) Testing putative hemichordate homologues of the chordate dorsal nervous system and endostyle: expression of NK2.1 (TTF-1) in the acorn worm Ptychodera flava (Hemichordata, Ptychoderidae). Evol Dev 4:405–417Google Scholar
  67. van der Horst CJ (1939). Hemichordata. In: Bronn HG (ed) Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H, Leipzig. 737 pGoogle Scholar
  68. Westheide W, Rieger RM (2007) Spezielle Zoologie. Teil 1: Einzeller und Wirbellose Tiere. Elsevier GmbH, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  69. Winchell C, Sullivan J, Cameron C, Swalla B, Mallatt J (2002) Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data. Mol Biol Evol 19:762–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Merker
    • 1
  • Alexander Gruhl
    • 2
  • Thomas Stach
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Institut für ZoologieTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyNatural History MuseumLondonUK
  3. 3.Vergleichende ZoologieHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations