Zoomorphology

, Volume 130, Issue 2, pp 85–95 | Cite as

Three-dimensional analysis of the canal network of an Indonesian Stylaster (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Stylasteridae) by means of X-ray computed microtomography

  • Stefania Puce
  • Daniela Pica
  • Lucia Mancini
  • Francesco Brun
  • Alessandro Peverelli
  • Giorgio Bavestrello
Original Paper

Abstract

This study describes the architecture of the coenosteal network in an Indonesian Stylaster species investigated by means of the X-ray computed microtomography (μ-CT) technique. The 3D approach allowed to characterize all internal cavity structures: a network of thin canals, gastropores, dactylopores, and ampullae. The main feature highlighted by this reconstruction is a dense network of thin canals extended to the entire colony. This network gives rise to and surrounds each cyclosystem. Moreover, the 3D analysis made it possible to study the reciprocal relationship between adjacent cyclosystems and to hypothesize the growth process of the branches of Stylaster sp.: each new cyclosystem buds between the gastropore and the dactylopores of the last formed one. The dactylopores of each cyclosystem are partially derived from the precedent one and are partially newly formed. The thin canals enveloping the dactylopores are actively involved in both the formation of a new gastropore and in the re-establishment of the typical amount of dactylopores in each cyclosystem. This growth process was confirmed by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of apical cyclosystems of several specimens. Results indicate that the non-destructive X-ray μ-CT technique can be fruitfully applied to characterize the coenosteal structures of stylasterids allowing the repetitive study of a specimen by means of virtually infinite section planes and different kinds of analyses (e.g., channel width and porosity).

Keywords

Stylasteridae Stylaster Canal network Growth X-ray microtomography 3D analysis 

References

  1. Bouillon J, Gravili C, Pagès F, Gili JM, Boero F (2006) An introduction to hydrozoa. Mémoir Mus Natl Hist Nat 194Google Scholar
  2. Broch H (1942) Investigations on Stylasteridae (Hydrocorals). Skr Norske Vidensk Akad I Mat-Naturv Klasse 3:1–113 6 pls, 38 figsGoogle Scholar
  3. Brun F, Mancini L, Kasae P, Favretto S, Dreossi D, Tromba G (2010) Pore3D: a software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nucl Instrum Meth A 615(3):326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns SD (1983) A generic revision of the Stylasterina (Coelenterata: Hydrozoa). Part 1. Description of the genera. Bull Mar Sci 33:427–508Google Scholar
  5. Cairns SD (1984) A generic revision of the Stylasteridae (Coelenterata: Hydrozoa). Part 2. Phylogenetic analysis. Bull Mar Sci 35:38–53Google Scholar
  6. de Pourtalès LF (1871) Deep-sea corals. Illustr Cat Mus Comp Zool Harv Coll 4:1–93 8 plsGoogle Scholar
  7. Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P (1997) A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Micros Oxford 185:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kak C, Slaney M (1987) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindner A, Cairns SD, Cunningham CW (2008) From offshore to onshore: multiple origins of shallow-water corals from deep-sea ancestors. PLoSONE 3(6):e2429Google Scholar
  10. Miglietta MP (2006) Hydractinia antonii sp. nov.: a new, partially calcified hydractiniid (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Hydractiniidae) from Alaska. J Mar Biol Ass UK 86:993–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miglietta MP, McNally L, Cunningham CW (2010) Evolution of calcium-carbonate skeletons in the hydractiniidae. Integr Comp Biol 50(3):428–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Millard N (1975) Monograph on the Hydroida of southern Africa. Ann S Afr Mus 68:1–513Google Scholar
  13. Moseley HN (1879) On the structure of the Stylasteridae, a family of the hydroid stony corals. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B 169:425–503Google Scholar
  14. Moseley HN (1881) Report on certain Hydroid, Alcyonarian and Madreporarian corals procured during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger in the years 1873–1876. Part 1. On the Hydrocorallinae. Rep Sci Res Voyage Chall Zool 2:1–101 209–230, pls 1–14Google Scholar
  15. Ostarello GL (1973) Natural history of the hydrocoral Allopora californica Verrill (1866). Biol Bull Mar Biol Lab Woods Hole 145:548–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Puce S, Bo M, Di Camillo CG, Paoli L, Pica D, Bavestrello G (2010) Morphology and development of the early growth stages of an Indonesian Stylaster (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). J Mar Biol Ass UK 90(6):1145–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosenfeld A, Kak AC (1982) Digital picture processing, 2nd ed. Academic Press, IncGoogle Scholar
  18. Schönberg HL, Shields G (2008) Micro-computed tomography for studies on Entobia: transparent substrate versus modern technology. In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L (eds) Current developments in bioerosion. Erlangen Earth Conference Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soille P (2004) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Stechow E (1921) Neue Gruppen skelettbildender Hydrozoen und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen rezenter und fossiler Formen. Verh dt Zool Ges 26:29–31Google Scholar
  21. Wisshak M, Lopez Correa M, Zibrowius H, Jakobsen J, Freiwald A (2009) Skeletal reorganisation affects geochemical signals, exemplified in the stylasterid hydrocoral Errina dabneyi (Azores Archipelago). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 397:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefania Puce
    • 1
  • Daniela Pica
    • 1
  • Lucia Mancini
    • 2
  • Francesco Brun
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alessandro Peverelli
    • 4
  • Giorgio Bavestrello
    • 1
  1. 1.DiSMarUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  2. 2.Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.P.A.Basovizza, TriesteItaly
  3. 3.Department of Industrial Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  4. 4.Immagini & Computer SncBareggio, MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations