Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma
- 22 Downloads
Partial nephrectomy has been persuaded as a widely accepted surgical procedure for T1a (≤ 4 cm) renal tumors. However, when treating T1b (4–7 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the “optimal” method of surgery is still debatable. The aim of the research is to evaluate the long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for patients with T1b RCC.
Materials and methods
From March 1, 2003 to July 1, 2016, 331 patients were included in the current study. Patients presented with unilateral T1b RCC and underwent either LPN (n = 177) or LRN (n = 154). Relevant clinical data including follow-ups were acquired from patients.
The operation time of the LPN group patients was longer than that of LRN group (94.3 min vs 88.3 min, p = 0.021) and LPN group patients required shorter stays in hospital (11.5 days vs. 13.4 days, p = 0.009). Contrast to LRN, level of eGFR was superior in LPN at the postoperative time of 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months (all p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank tests showed that patients undergoing LPN had a much higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.007), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.006) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.008) than those receiving LRN. In comparison with the LRN group, multivariable Cox analysis indicated that patients of the LPN group had a 1.9-fold OS, 2.9-fold CSS and 2.3-fold MFS.
For patients with T1b RCC, our findings revealed that OS, CSS and MFS are superior in patients receiving LPN than those treated with LRN. With the benefit of preserving renal function of LPN, which leads a less incidence risk of other systematic diseases, LPN may be the preferred option when condition permits for cases involving T1b RCC.
KeywordsT1b renal cell carcinoma Partial nephrectomy Radical nephrectomy Survival Renal function
This research was financially supported by the Capital Science and Technology Leading Talent Project (Project number: Z181100006318007).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital (China). Each enrolled patient provided written informed consent.
- Ani I, Finelli A, Alibhai SMH, Timilshina N, Fleshner N, Abouassaly R (2013) Prevalence and impact on survival of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. BJU Int 111:E300–E305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11675.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Badalato GM, Kates M, Wisnivesky JP, Choudhury AR, McKiernan JM (2012) Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach. BJU Int 109:1457–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10597.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Capitanio U et al (2015) Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function. Eur Urol 67:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deklaj T, Lifshitz DA, Shikanov SA, Katz MH, Zorn KC, Shalhav AL (2010) Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. J Endourol 24:1603–1607. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0312 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ (2012) A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 188:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2570 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kieran K, Montgomery JS, Daignault S, Roberts WW, Wolf JS Jr (2007) Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 21:754–759. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0337 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JH, Park YH, Kim YJ, Kang SH, Byun SS, Kwak C, Hong SH (2015) Perioperative and long-term renal functional outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair comparison. World J Urol 33:1579–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1488-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leibovich BC, Blute M, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H (2004) Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 171:1066–1070. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000113274.40885.db CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liss MA et al (2014) Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses. BMC Urol 14:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-101 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Minervini A, Mari A, Carini M, Porpiglia F (2016) Partial nephrectomy in clinical T1b renal tumors: multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach (the record project) reply. Urology 89:52–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.051 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mir MC, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, Zargar H, Mottrie A, Autorino R (2017) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 71:606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tachibana H, Takagi T, Kondo T, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and preserved renal parenchymal volume. Int J Urol 25:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13529 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar