Regorafenib in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytoma
- 151 Downloads
Antiangiogenic treatment approaches have failed to improve outcome in randomized trials of high-grade astrocytoma. One key mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic treatment may concern the upregulation of alternative pro-angiogenic pathways. Regorafenib is a potent multikinase inhibitor that may alter some of those pathways. In this retrospective study, we investigated efficacy and radiographic tumor growth patterns of regorafenib in recurrent high-grade astrocytoma.
We screened for patients with high-grade astrocytoma in whom regorafenib was administered for at least 4 weeks. We assessed treatment efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events defined by Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). In addition, radiographic tumor growth patterns were determined at baseline and recurrence.
A total of 6 patients met eligibility criteria. The number of recurrences prior to regorafenib varied between 2 and 6. Patients were on regorafenib treatment for at least 4 weeks and maximally 14 weeks. Median PFS was 3.5 months and ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 months. Radiographic response was progressive disease in all patients with an objective response rate of 0%. CTC°3 adverse events were observed in all but one patient. The most common radiographic growth pattern was local with no change in growth pattern at recurrence. An infiltrative tumor growth was not induced in any patient.
This retrospective study indicates a very poor performance of regorafenib in recurrent high-grade astrocytoma with a fairly high number of CTC°3 adverse events. In addition, regorafenib does not seem to bear a potential for infiltrative tumor growth promotion.
KeywordsRegorafenib Astrocytoma Glioblastoma High-grade glioma
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this retrospective study, formal consent is not required.
- van den Bent MJ, Baumert B, Erridge SC et al (2017) Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study. Lancet 390(10103):1645–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wick W, Chinot OL, Bendszus M et al (2016) Evaluation of pseudoprogression rates and tumor progression patterns in a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus radiotherapy/temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neurooncology 18(10):1434–1441Google Scholar