Gynecologic radiation oncology patients report unmet needs regarding sexual health communication with providers
- 77 Downloads
Following radiation therapy (RT), women with gynecologic malignancies report high rates of sexual dysfunction, but little is known regarding sexual health communication between these patients and health-care providers. This study assessed these patients’ beliefs/attitudes toward providers’ sexual history taking.
Surveys were administered to women who presented for follow-up care for gynecologic cancers in an academic radiation oncology department. The surveys assessed patient sexual health beliefs and inquiry preferences. Sexual functioning was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Ordered logistic regressions were performed to assess for correlations between survey responses, FSFI, and demographic characteristics.
Seventy-five subjects participated. Most (89.8%) had FSFI scores indicating sexual dysfunction. Most patients agreed that sexual function is an important component of overall health (78.7%) and that providers should inquire regularly (62.8%). Few (12.0%) reported embarrassment around provider discussions. Most (62.7%) preferred discussion with female providers, especially married patients (p = 0.03). Half (53.4%) agreed that sexual problems are an unavoidable part of aging, a view that was more common as education level decreased (p = 0.01). Most (62.7%) patients agreed that providers should regularly ask about their sexual history, with patients having significant differences in education level. Patients with low FSFI scores were less likely to report inquiry from their OB/Gyn (p = 0.03).
Gynecologic cancer radiotherapy patients want to discuss sexual health, but report suboptimal provider inquiry. Patient views and experiences varied based on marital status, education level, and FSFI score. This work highlights the need for improved sexual health communication between cancer patients and providers.
KeywordsSexual dysfunction Sexual history taking Radiation therapy Gynecological cancer
Investigator support for MBB was provided by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development BIRCWH Career Development Award # K12 HD001438. Institutional support for use of the REDCap application was provided through CTSA, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Grant UL1TR000433.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (2010) Sexual health fundamentals: talking with patients about sexuality and sexual health. https://www.arhp.org/images/uploadDocs/SHF_Talking.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
- Chen WT et al (2007) Chinese HIV-positive patients and their healthcare providers: contrasting Confucian versus Western notions of secrecy and support ANS. Adv Nurs Sci 30:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000300182.48854.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harmon G, Lefante J, Krousel-Wood M (2006) Overcoming barriers: the role of providers in improving patient adherence to antihypertensive medications. Curr Opin Cardiol 21:310–315. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hco.0000231400.10104.e2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moreira ED, Kim SC, Glasser D, Gingell C (2006) Sexual activity, prevalence of sexual problems, and associated help-seeking patterns in men and women aged 40–80 years in Korea: data from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors (GSSAB). J Sex Med 3:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00210.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roter DL (1983) Physician/patient communication: transmission of information and patient effects Md. State Med J 32:260–265Google Scholar
- Stead ML (2003) Sexual dysfunction after treatment for gynaecologic and breast malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000051561.77832.72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar