Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for unplanned discontinuation of scheduled treatment in elderly patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of the IBuTu study

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To gain knowledge about the factors associated with discontinuation of scheduled treatment in elderly men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Methods

Patients ≥ 70 years with CRPC starting a new line of treatment were included in a prospective cohort study. A geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed at baseline, including comorbidity, mobility, functional/mental/nutritional status, as well as depression. Furthermore, pain intensity, quality of life, ECOG-performance status, and physicians’ and patients’ perception of health were documented. Reasons for and factors associated with discontinuation of scheduled treatment were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

After inclusion of 177 of 300 planned patients, the study was closed due to slow recruitment. 160 patients were eligible for final analysis. Median age was 77.5 years. 46% received chemotherapy, and 54% hormonal treatment. Discontinuation of scheduled treatment occurred in 91 patients (57.6%). The main reasons were progressive disease/death in 63%, adverse events/toxicity in 22%, and withdrawal of consent in 8%. In bivariate analyses, factors associated with discontinuation of treatment were age ≥ 80 years, ECOG PS ≥ 2, compromised/poor health status (physicians’/patients’ assessment), and compromised functional or nutritional status. In multivariate analysis, the only remaining factor independently associated with discontinuation of scheduled treatment was impairment of activities of daily living (ADL < 100 points) (OR = 4.2 for discontinuation; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Despite limitations due to early termination of the study, our results demonstrate that discontinuation of scheduled treatment was common, and that compromised ADL seems to be a significant risk factor for treatment failure in elderly patients with CRPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balducci L, Extermann M (2000) Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach. Oncologist 5(3):224–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellera CA et al (2012) Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol 23(8):2166–2172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corre WR, Greillier L, Le Caër H et al (2016) Use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment for the management of elderly patients, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Phase III Randomized ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02 Study. J Clin Oncol 34:1476–1483. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decoster L et al (2015) Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations. Ann Oncol 26(2):288–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Pepa C, Cavaliere C, Rossetti S et al (2017) Predictive comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly prostate cancer patients: the prospective observational scoop trial results. Anticancer Drugs 28(1):104–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000000428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Droz JP, Balducci L, Bolla M et al (2010) Management of prostate cancer in older men: recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. BJU Int 106(4):462–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09334.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Droz JP et al (2014) Management of prostate cancer in older patients: updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 15(9):e404–e414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Droz JP, Albrand G, Gillessen S et al (2017) Management of prostate cancer in elderly patients: recommendations of a task force of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.025

    Google Scholar 

  • Extermann M, Boler I, Reich R et al (2012) Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the chemotherapy risk assessment scale for high-age patients (CRASH) score. Cancer 1:3377–3386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker ME, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH et al (2012) The value of geriatric assessments in predicting treatment tolerance and all-cause mortality in older patients with cancer. Oncologist 17(11):1439–1449. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins LF et al (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341(27):2061–2067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pallis AG et al (2010) EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient. Eur J Cancer 46(9):1502–1513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wildiers H, Mauer M, Pallis A et al (2013) End points and trial design in geriatric oncology research: a Joint european organisation for research and treatment of cancer—alliance for clinical trials in Oncology—International Society of Geriatric Oncology Position Article. J Clin Oncol 31(29):3711–3718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following physicians for entering patients into the trial: Dr. med. Haytham Al Akkad, Dr. med. Uwe Behrendt, Manfred Binder, Dr. med. Frank Brands, Dr. med. Horst Brenneis, Dr. med. Ralf Eckert, Dr. med. Rolf H. Eichenauer, Dr. med. Thomas Frangenheim, Jan Franz, Dr. med. Miguel Garcia-Schürmann, Torsten Geyer, Dr. med. Jochen Gleißner, Dr. med. Richard Hansen, Dr. med. Eva Hellmis, Dr. med. Jürgen Jeßberger, Dr. med. Martine Klausmann, Dr. med. Jörg Klier, Prof. Dr. med. Theodor Klotz, PD Dr. med. Frank König, Dipl. Med. Stefan Kowalik, Dr. med. Uwe-Carsten Lock, Dr. med. Frank Meyer, Bernd Möhler, Dr. med. Detlef Müller, Dr. med. Eberhard Mumperow, Christian Nitz, Dr. med. Burkhard Otremba, Dr. med. Michael Peter, Dr. med. Dieter Popp, Dr. med. Michael Prosinger, Dr. med. Sebastian Rau, Dr. med. Wolfgang Rulf, Dr. med. Christoph Rüssel, Dr. med. Axel Schroeder, Dr. med. Matthias Schulze, PD Dr. med. Gernot Seipelt, Dr. med. Jörg Seraphin, Dr. med. Gabriele Simson, Dr. med. Steffen Sturm, Dr. med. Silvio Szymula, Dipl. Med. Jens Telle, Thorsten Werner, Anja Winkel, Dr. med. Jan Wolf, Dr. med. Torsten Woschick, Dr. med. Mark-Oliver Zahn.

Funding

This study was funded by Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Grant number 212082PCR4009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lothar Weißbach.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Friedemann Honecker declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Ulrich Wedding declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gerd Kallischnigg declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Axel Schroeder declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Jörg Klier declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Thomas Frangenheim declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Lothar Weißbach declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honecker, F., Wedding, U., Kallischnigg, G. et al. Risk factors for unplanned discontinuation of scheduled treatment in elderly patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of the IBuTu study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 571–577 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2577-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2577-1

Keywords

Navigation