Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

, Volume 144, Issue 2, pp 337–341 | Cite as

Survival benefit of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor in male and female breast cancer

  • Holm EggemannEmail author
  • Udo Altmann
  • Serban-Dan Costa
  • Atanas Ignatov
Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Background

Our goal was to compare the survival advantage of tamoxifen (TAM) and aromatase inhibitor (AI) in female (FBC) and male breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective study of 2785 FBC and 257 MBC patients treated with hormonal therapy.

Results

The median follow-up was 106 months (range 3–151 months) and 42 months (range 2–115 months) for FBC and MBC, respectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the hormonal therapy used: TAM-treated and AI-treated. MBC was characterized by older age, advanced tumor stage, and higher rate of lymph node metastases, in comparison with FBC. Matching analysis was performed using six prognostic criteria: patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node status, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status, and administration of chemotherapy. The female and male patients were matched 2:1. In this analysis, 316 women and 158 men treated with TAM, and 60 women and 30 men treated with AI, were included. The overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and was compared between FBC and MBC. TAM-treated FBC and MBC patients had similar 5-year OS, 85.1 and 89.2%, respectively (p = 0.972). Notably, FBC patients treated with AI had significantly greater 5-year OS (85.0%) in comparison with AI-treated MBC patients (5-year OS of 73.3%; p = 0.028).

Conclusions

The OS of TAM-treated patients with MBC was similar to the OS of TAM-treated FBC patients, whereas AI treatment is associated with poorer survival of MBC patients.

Keywords

Male breast cancer Tamoxifen Aromatase inhibitor 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before treatment. An additional individual consent for this analysis was not needed.

References

  1. Anderson WF, Althuis MD, Brinton LA, Devesa SS (2004) Is male breast cancer similar or different than female breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 83(1):77–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Eggemann H, Ignatov A, Smith BJ, Altmann U, von Minckwitz G, Rohl FW, Jahn M, Costa SD (2013) Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen compared to aromatase inhibitors for 257 male breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(2):465–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eggemann H, Ignatov T, Burger E, Kantelhardt EJ, Fettke F, Thomssen C, Costa SD, Ignatov A (2015) Moderate HER2 expression as a prognostic factor in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 22(5):725–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Goss PE, Reid C, Pintilie M, Lim R, Miller N (1999) Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955–1996. Cancer 85(3):629–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Losurdo A, Rota S, Gullo G, Masci G, Torrisi R, Bottai G, Zuradelli M, Gatzemeier W, Santoro A (2017) Controversies in clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies of male breast cancer: a review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 113:283–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ribeiro G, Swindell R (1992) Adjuvant tamoxifen for male breast cancer (MBC). Br J Cancer 65(2):252–254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Roselli CE, Resko JA (1997) Sex differences in androgen-regulated expression of cytochrome P450 aromatase in the rat brain. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 61(3–6):365–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shetty G, Krishnamurthy H, Krishnamurthy HN, Bhatnagar AS, Moudgal NR (1998) Effect of long-term treatment with aromatase inhibitor on testicular function of adult male bonnet monkeys (M. radiata). Steroids 63(7–8):414–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Volm MD (2003) Male breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 4(2):159–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holm Eggemann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Udo Altmann
    • 2
  • Serban-Dan Costa
    • 1
  • Atanas Ignatov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyOtto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Clinical Tumour Registry CoordinationJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations